Anyone close to converting to Catholicism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristanl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just curious
Code:
 I am a mainline Protestant, quite content to live with the idea that God isn't all that interested in our religious labels, our church affiliations, or even our theologies. You will recall how Christ was asked how to inherit eternal life? He responded by saying nothing about doctrine but commanded us to love God and our neighbor, and he illustrated that with the parable of the Good Samaritan. As for me personally, I treasure the freedom to entertain all sorts of teachings about matters of faith, respecting most of them, even embracing one here and there, although I do have some difficulty with those expressions of Christianity - whether Catholic, Orthodox, or various forms of Protestant fundamentalism - which argue dogmatgically that there is only one true religion and it is theirs! I revere God enough to believe that God is beyond the comprehension of our finite minds. As Harry Emerson Fosdick once said: "I can only believe in a God I cannot understand."

 My own paternal family was French-Canadian Catholic a couple generations ago and became Protestant. My late and beloved wife was Catholic, attended parochial school and such, but had abandoned Catholicism by the time we had met and were married. Frankly, she became strongly Protestant (liberal Protestant, if you will), in part perhaps because she had some painful memories of the nuns from childhood, but also because, like me, she enjoyed discussing different faiths without feeling limitations on exploring and even smiling upon different beliefs. For example, she never embraced Buddhism, but she admired much about it. She also admired the Bahais as well as Unitarianism, etc. At the same time, she sought to follow those teachings of Christ that spoke of other flocks, focused on reaching out to the poor and others in need, and espoused other principles found particularly in the Sermon on the Mount (peace etc.).

  My question? What is the position of Catholicism today on my Catholic grandparents who became Protestant, and, more important, what about my wife? Could they be in heaven, according to Catholic doctrine? I recall a Catholic priest accusing her years ago of 'living in sin' - that her marriage was invalid - because she had been baptized and confirmed Catholic but was married outside the church, by a Protestant minister. I rather thought that this sort of thinking had disappeared from Catholicism after Vatican II, but the priest's accusation came two decades or more after the Council had adjourned in 1965.

   God bless people of every creed, color and country, and may religion become a bridge and not a barrier among us.
Well Roy , I really don’t know what to say to console you, Sounds like the loved ones in your life were pulled of track in a serious way as far as their Catholic heritage was concerned, one thing I do understand for sure is that while we can judge sinful behavior as such, ONLY God can judge the intentions of our hearts. We do have a merciful God and he knows our hearts inside out:) Carlan
 
I believe that the Holy Spirit leads you in the way that God has planned for your life.
I haven’t been lead towards Catholicism. I don’t really want to be affiliated with a specific denomination though. Maybe Non-denominational would be good?

Do you think that people should convert to Catholicism? What if they convert to become a Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran, United Bretheran, ect?
Do you believe there’s anything wrong with that?

I am just wondering…:cool:.
If some one is going to conveert why not convert to the Church started by Our Lord Jesus Christ,if you read your Bible He started ONE Church All the other come 1500 years later
 
I have been in my roman catholic church now only for 6 weeks. Not comfirmed… I have had introductary RCIA but the real course begins in september.
Well,That is wonderful, I’m sorry I jumped to conclusions about your first post and I pray for you that you will have a very fruitful experience in RCIA, come September.:thumbsup:Carlan
 
Well,That is wonderful, I’m sorry I jumped to conclusions about your first post and I pray for you that you will have a very fruitful experience in RCIA, come September.:thumbsup:Carlan
Thank you carlan and God bless.
 
They’re deliberately choosing not to have sex during a woman’s fertile periods which is a form of contraception. It is a conscious effort to NOT get pregnant no matter how you spin it.

Thanks for the links.
You do realize that before 1930 all Christians (church theology) believed artificial contracepting was morally wrong (you don’t think that sacred tradition and sacred scripture had anything to do with this)? And doesn’t it matter that the CC is the only one holding out (or does God’s truth change)? You believe the consciencious method of abstaining (so one can be responsible naturally and without violating the conjugal act itself) is the equivalent of (literally) wasting sperm (like Onan in the Bible)?

Your welcome and God bless.
 
NoWings, IT just sounds to me that you are trying yourself to justify a behavior of your own ???
Perhaps. I said so in the original post I made in this thread. I do not agree with it and most likely will never convert because of such a view. I also said kudos to those that can.
 
You do realize that before 1930 all Christians (church theology) believed artificial contracepting was morally wrong (you don’t think that sacred tradition and sacred scripture had anything to do with this)? And doesn’t it matter that the CC is the only one holding out (or does God’s truth change)? You believe the consciencious method of abstaining (so one can be responsible naturally and without violating the conjugal act itself) is the equivalent of (literally) wasting sperm (like Onan in the Bible)?

Your welcome and God bless.
So? Slavery was condoned until a point that people decided it was wrong. Geocentrism was preached as truth even though it was wrong (though not morally).

Yes, I believe the conscious effort of attempting to work around a woman’s fertile period to not get her pregnant is equivalent to wearing a thin piece of latex at all times of the month to not get her pregnant. Either way, avoidance of pregnancy is the goal.

This is getting the thread off-topic. Anyone who wants to beat this dead horse some more
can make a new thread.
 
So? Slavery was condoned until a point that people decided it was wrong. Geocentrism was preached as truth even though it was wrong (though not morally).

Yes, I believe the conscious effort of attempting to work around a woman’s fertile period to not get her pregnant is equivalent to wearing a thin piece of latex at all times of the month to not get her pregnant. Either way, avoidance of pregnancy is the goal.

This is getting the thread off-topic. Anyone who wants to beat this dead horse some more
can make a new thread.
Nowings,
please hear me; there is no such thing as a bad catholic, only a bad christian. These people are not representing the whole catholic church, please don’t be too hurt by their words… 😦
 
Care to elaborate?
Jon
I see no need to, any further elaboration would be meant with hostility by armchair apologist and take the original post further afield. Thank you for you interest though
 
Nowings,
please hear me; there is no such thing as a bad catholic, only a bad christian. These people are not representing the whole catholic church, please don’t be too hurt by their words… 😦
Eh, I don’t take much offense to it. I suppose I’d defend my Mother if I thought someone was insulting Her.
 
I see no need to, any further elaboration would be meant with hostility by armchair apologist and take the original post further afield. Thank you for you interest though
It just seemed a kind of off-the-cuff remark. But you are probably right. 🤷
Jon
 
What about the Orthodox?

Jon
orthodox is 1000 years after the Founding of the Church.
Protestants broke off another 500 years later.
The Orthodoxy has a more stable Foundation, and is closer to Catholicism then Protestants are.

Protestanst are sola scriptura
Bible only

tahts 1 pillar of foundation

Orthodox have 2

Tradition
Scripture

Catholic has all 3

Magesterium
Tradition
Scripture
 
You are being very rude or ignort
Tuttle01, I do not think this post was fro you, it was for Hisalone the one that keeps crying and not answering the post, that does all the copy and paste ,so let me say I,M SORRY.
 
So? Slavery was condoned until a point that people decided it was wrong. Geocentrism was preached as truth even though it was wrong (though not morally).

Yes, I believe the conscious effort of attempting to work around a woman’s fertile period to not get her pregnant is equivalent to wearing a thin piece of latex at all times of the month to not get her pregnant. Either way, avoidance of pregnancy is the goal.

This is getting the thread off-topic. Anyone who wants to beat this dead horse some more
can make a new thread.
Slavery was never condoned by the Church nor was it perceived as morally right, and geocentrism was not a religious truth but a scientific belief held even before the Church came to existence (what does this have to do with anything?).

p.s. If you are a man who is truly seeking out truth then you will find it.
 
DH and I will hopefully be finishing the process this year. Third time’s the charm, right? (Prayers appreciated :D)
 
=Angel7;5544187]orthodox is 1000 years after the Founding of the Church.
The Orthodox trace succession back to the apostles, just like the Catholics do. They would claim Rome broke away from the True Church.
Protestants broke off another 500 years later.
The Orthodoxy has a more stable Foundation, and is closer to Catholicism then Protestants are.
Some Orthodox here seem to think you are more like us than like them. 🤷

Jon
 
The Orthodox trace succession back to the apostles, just like the Catholics do. They would claim Rome broke away from the True Church.

Some Orthodox here seem to think you are more like us than like them. 🤷

Jon
Some Orthodox here seem to think you are more like us than like them. 🤷

Eaither way, the Protestant Church is the farthest away:)

But it was on Peter, that he was made Leader of the Church on Earth.
Peter went to Rome. He died there. His body is there.
He was First Pope.
The Popes are the successors to Peter.

In the History Books, the Orthodox Church Relied more on the Theocracy of Eastern Rome (Byzantine Empire)
They View the King of Byzantine as leader. Correct me if im wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top