P
phil19034
Guest
I love any chanting or singing in Latin. Wish my parish did it. I look forward to times I can make a Latin Mass and try to attend concerts at the Cathedral when they have them.
My parish sings everything and anything I give them… except chant.It *does *work…and without any panicking or negative underestimating of humanity’s ability to do what comes naturally. Perseverance and repetition are the key. A choir to sustain it all helps, too.
But people associated with guitars tend to make it a performance. I simply don’t think that kind of music reverent. I don’t like to jam during communion. I would prefer contemplative music which does not stand out, distract, or turn the mass into a music concert.particular instruments don’t make something “a music performance”
You made it an absolute statement before, and it’s not. I know plenty of guitarists that play for church that would NEVER consider it or play like its a performance or “jam out” So no, the “tendency” argument does not hold either.But people associated with guitars tend to make it a performance. I simply don’t think that kind of music reverent. I don’t like to jam during communion. I would prefer contemplative music which does not stand out, distract, or turn the mass into a music concert.
- The Church acknowledges Gregorian chant as specially suited to the Roman liturgy: therefore, other things being equal, it should be given pride of place in liturgical services.
But other kinds of sacred music, especially polyphony, are by no means excluded from liturgical celebrations, so long as they accord with the spirit of the liturgical action, as laid down in Art. 30.
vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html
- To promote active participation, the people should be encouraged to take part by means of acclamations, responses, psalmody, antiphons, and songs, as well as by actions, gestures, and bodily attitudes. And at the proper times all should observe a reverent silence.
Rete, you’ve joined the conversation on this thread later, so perhaps you haven’t read any of my posts.Instead of getting upset about me not liking your guitar mass in a thread where you feel free to talk about how you dislike my chant, let’s see what Vatican II had to say…
vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html
So… in the spirit of Vatican II, I think we should see some more respect for chant, since it is “specially suited to the Roman liturgy”.
That’s not to say you can’t have guitar mass too. But does it have to mean that there are hardly any masses with chant, even though a Church council affirms it’s superior position in the mass?
Yeah I’m with you, harmony sounds a lot better than monophony.i understand why the church likes to maintain it since it’s simple but i personally just don’t like it. i much prefer a nice harmonized 4 part choir. anyone else?
I didn’t join the thread later. I responded to an earlier attack on my post that I personally don’t exactly feel thrilled when I see the band show up. Do you want to know why?Rete, you’ve joined the conversation on this thread later, so perhaps you haven’t read any of my posts.
I’ll repeat the gist of my posts: There are very few people who chant. There are a few more people who play the guitar.
Windmill posted that he and nine other men formed a schola years ago that continues. TEN men. That’s all. That schola has been around for ten years, and only ten men belong to it. And he said that they sing at Masses, weddings, funerals, and other events. What this implies is that there are no other people in their city who chant. If a parish wants chant, they don’t “do it” themselves; instead, they call up the Brazos Valley Schola Cantorum.
Various church documents make it clear that the guitar is an instrument that can be used in Mass, mainly because the Bishop of any given diocese has the Church-given (therefore Christ-given) authority to determine which instruments are appropriate in HIS location for Mass. The guitar is one of the oldest instruments in the world, and most thinking people nowadays recognize that the guitar is not just a secular instrument.
I play piano, and my husband plays guitar, and frankly, I resent your accusation that those who play guitar in the Mass “tend to make it a performance.” You are way off with this accusation. As I have said before on this and other threads–get to know the guitarists in your parish. I think you will find that they are devout and humble Catholics who are simply using their talents and abilities to SERVE, not “perform for” our Lord Jesus Christ and His people.
Oh stop the hyperbole…goodness. No one “attacked” your post. and that’s not what you said. You said that guitars equated to a performance, and I corrected that judgement by saying instruments don’t make something a performance.I didn’t join the thread later. I responded to an earlier attack on my post that I personally don’t exactly feel thrilled when I see the band show up. Do you want to know why?
Picture me sitting there, praying the rosary. Nearby there is a woman praying for her deceased loved one. Here and there you see people quietly in prayer. Then comes the band twenty minutes before mass and they start jamming away. Can you pray the rosary when people are strumming away on their vintage guitars? I have trouble with that. I am sure lots of other people do too. I know this by the look on the faces of all the people who were quietly in prayer to our Lord before the band showed up. Then during communion, when I want to pray and meditate on the Eucharist, the guitar strumming kicks in. I can’t do it.
That’s why my heart sinks when I see them show up. It’s not personal. I don’t dislike the people who do it. I find it interesting that I have to tolerate this while the mention of it offends the people who think it’s okay to do these things.
Two things would make it a lot more palatable. (1) The band does not show up to practice right before mass or they practice in another room; (2) We use chants (or at least more reverent music) during communion and meditation. That leaves at least two songs where you guys can play your guitars.
spectator.org/archives/2013/06/17/can-liturgical-music-be-savedAmong Catholics, Pope Benedict XVI was instrumental to this reversal of fortunes. As an accomplished pianist with a fondness for Mozart and the other greats of the Western canon, one of the things that Pope Benedict offered in his quietly formidable way was a theological and musical critique of modernity. Leaning perceptively on his 2000 book The Spirit of the Liturgy, Australian theologian Tracey Rowland has written about Pope Benedict’s impatience with “parish tea party liturgies” and “utility music.” Then-Cardinal Ratzinger also decried “the obscuring of the sacred by the operatic” and “the threat of invasion by the virtuoso mentality.” Liturgical music, in his judgment, should “arouse the voice of the cosmos and, by glorifying the creator, elicit the glory of the cosmos itself, making it also glorious, beautiful, habitable and beloved.” This exalted view of liturgical music sits well beyond the emotive range of most power ballads, and it is warmly recommended to the faithful because “Next to the saints, the art which the church has produced is the only real apologia for her history.”
That’s obvious even at the EF.I’ll repeat the gist of my posts: There are very few people who chant.
I agree. I think the Church could do worse than say that at one Sunday every “Season” everyone should try and chant the Missa De Angelis Kyrie, Sanctus and Agnus, and the Credo. Not everyone can, or indeed would, participate (many don’t anyway even in the vernacular) but it might help endue some familiarity with that part of the Church’s music.That’s obvious even at the EF.
But it seems the thrust of Pope Paul VI’s statement to the bishops is to find a way as to integrate into each and every parish, whether it’s a Polish Mass, a Spanish Mass, etc. some or all of what the Vatican II itself has “composed” for the Church together at the same Mass the Vatican has promulgated. Pope JPII and Pope Benedict XVI have also tried to make the Latin chants appealing and it’s up to us to at least be somewhat familiar with them. I don’t think statements such as “I don’t like it” are the answer to the Church’s request that it be sung at the Mass, either at the OF or EF.
I like the chant, I like singing the Latin parts of the Mass on occasion. I like the singing of Latin hymns such as, Pange Lingua, Panis Angelicus, Veni Creator Spiritus, and the Benediction hymns O Salutaris and Tantum Ergo. What I am not particularly fond of is when the Latin choir sings the Latin Mass parts, and the Greek Kyrie that are very very very long. It is just repeating the same words over and over and over again. I grew up with the Latin Mass and I don’t ever recall having these parts last that long.
That is exactly how it comes across- as a performance!
I agree. For a Cathedral, it might be ok, but on the parish level, simple chant seems to work best. For one thing, it encourages more participation.
The more complex chants end up creating one of the same problems associated with the secular-style religious songs…less participation, and a more “performance” oriented feel.
As much as I dislike Chant, I also agree.I agree. I think the Church could do worse than say that at one Sunday every “Season” everyone should try and chant the Missa De Angelis Kyrie, Sanctus and Agnus, and the Credo. Not everyone can, or indeed would, participate (many don’t anyway even in the vernacular) but it might help endue some familiarity with that part of the Church’s music.