Ape fossil bridges evolutionary gap

  • Thread starter Thread starter SocaliCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
hecd2:
There are many characteristics of the cranium and post-cranial skeleton that show a mixture of primitive and derived characteristics - I’d be happy to post a comprehensive review of these characteristics if anyone would like them.

Alec
evolutionpages.com
Sure, I’ll take you up on that bluff… Oops I mean offer!
 
40.png
SocaliCatholic:
Sure, I’ll take you up on that bluff… Oops I mean offer!
Dear Socali,

You should know me by now - I don’t bluff, although I wonder how you plan to use this info (which is based on the Moya-Sola et al paper, by the way).
**
Cranium**
Derived characteristics:
  • Frontal processes of maxillae, the nasals and the orbits on the same plane
  • flat nasals projecting anteriorly beneath level of lower orbital rims
  • high zygomatic root
  • high nasoalveolar clivus
  • deep palate
  • broad nasal aperture widest at the base
Primitive characteristics:
  • Low face
  • Posteriorly situated glabella
  • Frontal squama forming an open angle with the orbital plane
  • Less orthognathous profile.
Cranial summary: Great ape features associated with a primitive hominoid facial profile.

**Post-cranial skeleton
**Derived characteristics:
  • Broad shallow thorax
  • Large size and derived shape of clavicle
  • Inferred dorsal position of scapula on rib cage
  • Lumbar vertebrae:
  • Robustness of wide and short pedicles of lumbar vertebrae
  • Caudally oriented spinous process
  • Lack of ventral keel and concave shape of ventrolateral sides
  • Wrist:
  • Small triquetrum
  • 90 degree angle of pisiform facet with lateral surface
  • non-articular ulnar styloid process
Primitive characteristics:
  • Phalanges:
  • proximal articular facet tilted proximodorsally
  • Large and widely separated plantar tubercles enclosing a deep central depression
  • Wide and flat proximal articular surface
Post-cranial summary: Derived (ape-like) body and wrist with primitive (monkey-like) hands and fingers.

Useful? Tee-hee.

Alec
evolutionpages.com
 
SocaliCatholic said:
msnbc.msn.com/id/6522090/

Just curious what the creationists and evolutionists think.

If its a hoax, how did they pull it off? Or is this insurmountable evidence showing evolution?

Apparently they’re not jumping to any conclusions. So why should we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top