S
St_Francis
Guest
I go to Mass at a different place from time to time, and they say the Apostles’ Creed instead of the Nicene. Is this legit, and why do they do it?
Interesting…We do it for Lent, along with some other changes, every year. It’s nothing new.
I have tried to recall all of the Lenten changes to the Mass in my parish. This list may not be complete, but it’s close. During Lent:We do it for Lent, along with several other changes, every year. It’s nothing new.
These two are prescribed by the rubrics of the Mass. The others are permitted, acceptable, nice to do, but not required or prescribed anywhere.
- The Gloria is omitted.
- The Gospel Acclamation is not “Alleluia,” but rather “Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ, King of endless glory.”
You’ve piqued my interest: do you just mean that your priest(s) use a different one of the normal four Eucharistic Prayers? Or is there something else that they’ve decided to use during Lent?Different (not the usual) Eucharistic Prayers
The Sunday before last, I heard one that sounded new to me. When I asked, after Mass, the priest said there were two Eucharistic Prayers that they planned to use during Lent. I guess they are among the four, and now that I have reviewed those, I think perhaps it was EP IV, which I have heard so rarely, if ever, that I thought it was composed especially for Lent.You’ve piqued my interest: do you just mean that your priest(s) use a different one of the normal four Eucharistic Prayers? Or is there something else that they’ve decided to use during Lent?
EP IV can’t be used during Lent. Actually, it can only be used during Ordinary Time, as it has a proper preface that must be said with the EP. They are probably the Eucharistic Prayers for Reconciliation, of which there are two. These also have proper prefaces, but you can use any of the Lenter prefaces with them as well, whereas you can’t with EP IV.The Sunday before last, I heard one that sounded new to me. When I asked, after Mass, the priest said there were two Eucharistic Prayers that they planned to use during Lent. I guess they are among the four, and now that I have reviewed those, I think perhaps it was EP IV, which I have heard so rarely, if ever, that I thought it was composed especially for Lent.
This year is the first time I’ve ever heard those used in our parish. The priest who was just made administrator after the untimely death of our Pastor has been using Reconciliation II since Ash Wednesday.EP IV can’t be used during Lent. Actually, it can only be used during Ordinary Time, as it has a proper preface that must be said with the EP. They are probably the Eucharistic Prayers for Reconciliation, of which there are two. These also have proper prefaces, but you can use any of the Lenter prefaces with them as well, whereas you can’t with EP IV.
The GIRM only requires that the Creed be said. It does not specify which one.I go to Mass at a different place from time to time, and they say the Apostles’ Creed instead of the Nicene. Is this legit, and why do they do it?
Yes indeed.The GIRM only requires that the Creed be said. It does not specify which one.
I didn’t realize it was an option.Of course, I also prefer tresspass to sins in the Our Father!
Probably isn’t, but it’s the way I learned it in the 60’s!I didn’t realize it was an option.
What’s interesting to me is that ICEL made changes (if you call them that) to the Nicene Creed both in the late 60’s and then in the 2011 English version. I do recall Apostles Creed being used but it essentially is the same version as we used in the Rosary in the 50’s. In your opinion, is there anything special in the English Apostle’s Creed that makes the wording “untouchable”?It should be noted that some countries had long ago petitioned the Holy See for permission to use the Apostles Creed and it had been granted. We in Canada have been using it for years and the permission we had to do so was noted in our 1975 GIRM.
There were changes, but very minor. The English translation never resulted in any question about theology. The Nicene Creed, on the other hand, was more noticeably changed to clarify theological understanding.Then again there may have been changes but I didn’t notice.