Archbishop Cordileone thankful for San Francisco teacher contract agreement [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i...opos_via_Flickr_CC_BY_NC_20_CNA_2_4_15.jpgSan Francisco, Calif., Aug 23, 2015 / 06:07 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Efforts to promote Catholic culture in the San Francisco archdiocese’s high schools and to agree on a contract acceptable for the schools’ teachers concluded on Wednesday with a new contract.

The months-long dispute months drew protests, interference from activist groups, and the attention of wealthy critics of Catholic teaching.

“I want to thank the union and administration negotiating teams for their hard work over the past few months in coming to this agreement. They have negotiated just wages and benefits for our high school teachers, who are among the finest teachers in northern California,” Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone said Aug. 19.

The archbishop said he appreciated “very much” the negotiations’ “rich discussion about the mission and purpose of Catholic education and the vital role that our high school teachers play in carrying out that mission.”

He said the discussions “reinforced and clarified” the purposes and roles that were referenced in previous contracts.

“I pass on my special thanks to all our teachers who ratified this agreement,” Archbishop Cordileone said.

The teachers ratified the three-year contract by a vote of 90 to 80. The contract covers teachers at the Archdiocese of San Francisco’s four Catholic high schools. It provides a two percent pay raise in each of the three years. Disputes over teacher conduct both in the workplace and outside of the workplace would be governed by grievance procedures, SFGate.com reports.

The contract says the purpose of Catholic schools is “to affirm Catholic values through the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” It says that teachers are expected to support the school’s purpose “in such a way that their personal conduct will not adversely impact their ability to teach in our Catholic high schools.”

The contract did not include specific morality clauses, the news site SFGate.com reports. The archdiocese’s first proposed of the teacher contracts identified teachers as having a “ministerial role.” The language echoed a 2012 Supreme Court decision which recognized that teachers at religious schools can be held to standards of behavior without putting religious schools at risk of employment lawsuits.

The initial version of the San Francisco archdiocese faculty handbooks also explained Catholic teaching on controversial issues such as Catholic religious doctrine, sexual morality, and the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies, such as IVF. These passages were particularly criticized and the archdiocese later modified the handbooks.

The emphasis on Catholic teaching caused strong reaction among some in San Francisco, a city known for its dedication to LGBT advocacy and for its strong taboos against traditional Christianity and sexual morality.

The agreement on the contract closes a period of protests and critical media coverage.

Ted deSaulnier, an executive member of the teachers’ union and a religion teacher at Archbishop Riordan High School, supported the contract.

“I believe in the end the archbishop compromised and that we negotiated in good faith and he did as well,” he told SFGate. “I want the most protection for any Catholic school teacher to have the fullest and most complete private life they can have,” adding that “Our contract is not going to solve the conflict between a 2,000-year-old religious institution and the changing landscape of civil rights in the United States.”

Nina Russo, the archdiocese’s interim superintendent of schools, said the archdiocese looks forward “to our students returning to a year of learning and rich, meaningful experiences in both academics and school life.”

“We appreciate the concerted efforts of teachers and school leadership to prepare for this new school opening with the highest degree of commitment and professionalism,” she said.

In the initial controversy, some local politicians threatened legal action against the archdiocese, and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution critical of the handbook changes. More than 350 employees, about 80 percent of the staff and faculty at the archdiocese’s four high schools, signed a petition against the handbook additions. Some students, teachers, and parents also engaged in several protests.

Archbishop Cordileone also drew support from many Catholics, including hundreds of supporters who attended a May picnic. Some of the archbishop’s supporters did not speak out for fear social and career pressure.

Sam Singer, founder of the influential San Francisco-based communications firm Singer Associates, told the SF Weekly in February that “concerned parents” were paying for his services in their dispute with the archbishop. Singer’s social media accounts publicized negative interpretations of the archbishop and the archdiocese while promoting stories siding with the protesters.

At one point, dozens of prominent San Franciscans, including several Catholics, took out a full-page ad in the San Francisco Chronicle. The ad, an open letter, asked Pope Francis to remove Archbishop Cordileone.

Long before the schools controversy, some critics have faulted the archbishop for his support of marriage as a union of one man and one woman in state law.

feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/catholicnewsagency/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~4/jT1a_FaldA8

Full article…
 
A huge concession made by the Archbishop here in San Francisco was the morality clause. No ‘ministerial’ title for faculty and staff. I believe this is a good thing for everyone. The unions stuck to their principles and it worked. Gays and lesbians cannot be fired. Non-Catholics cannot be forced to live as conservative Catholics. Teachers will continue to teach as they were hired to do and the schools will continue to be Catholic schools. I sincerely hope that this school year shows how it can be accomplished with integrity.

A sigh of relief.
 
A huge concession made by the Archbishop here in San Francisco was the morality clause. No ‘ministerial’ title for faculty and staff. I believe this is a good thing for everyone. The unions stuck to their principles and it worked. Gays and lesbians cannot be fired. Non-Catholics cannot be forced to live as conservative Catholics. Teachers will continue to teach as they were hired to do and the schools will continue to be Catholic schools. I sincerely hope that this school year shows how it can be accomplished with integrity.

A sigh of relief.
This article says:
Supporters of faithful Catholic education will be happy to see that the Appendix states that education and all on-site duties are to be in accordance with “the doctrines and precepts of the Roman Catholic Church” and “in keeping with the standards of the Church.” This clause can be used by the Archdiocese to remove teachers who teach or lead students in a manner contrary to Church doctrines, standards and precepts. Such language is broad enough to give the Archdiocese power to remove errant teachers, however, best practice and the examples of some other dioceses suggest the benefit of clarifying that the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Canon Law are critical sources of these doctrines and precepts.
crisismagazine.com/2015/a-look-at-san-franciscos-new-teacher-contract
 
This article which looks at the ‘contract’ says:
Supporters of faithful Catholic education will be happy to see that the Appendix states that education and all on-site duties are to be in accordance with “the doctrines and precepts of the Roman Catholic Church” and “in keeping with the standards of the Church.” This clause can be used by the Archdiocese to remove teachers who teach or lead students in a manner contrary to Church doctrines, standards and precepts. Such language is broad enough to give the Archdiocese power to remove errant teachers, however, best practice and the examples of some other dioceses suggest the benefit of clarifying that the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Canon Law are critical sources of these doctrines and precepts.
crisismagazine.com/2015/a-look-at-san-franciscos-new-teacher-contract

I do think it is dissapointing that the morality contracts are not included, especially considering the flak Archbishop Cordelione took. The fact that he took so much criticism raises concern over the teachers who opposed the contract. Perhaps some teachers did not understand it properly but many may be just at odds with Catholic sexual morality.
 
crisismagazine.com/2015/a-look-at-san-franciscos-new-teacher-contract

I do think it is dissapointing that the morality contracts are not included, especially considering the flak Archbishop Cordelione took. The fact that he took so much criticism raises concern over the teachers who opposed the contract. Perhaps some teachers did not understand it properly but many may be just at odds with Catholic sexual morality.
I think it is absolutely appropriate that the teachers realize that they are in a Catholic school and teach accordingly. To my knowledge, there has never been a problem in any of the schools on site. It’s the morality clause that takes away any protection for the staff, discrimination-wise.
 
I think it is absolutely appropriate that the teachers realize that they are in a Catholic school and teach accordingly. To my knowledge, there has never been a problem in any of the schools on site. It’s the morality clause that takes away any protection for the staff, discrimination-wise.
But the morality clause is needed for accountability. Otherwise, a teacher can simply state that their personal lifestyle, while it may be contrary to Catholic teaching, doesn’t impact their ability to teach. So a teacher who is living with their boyfriend or girlfriend, or has procured an abortion, or publicly advocates Planned Parenthood’s practice of harvesting the organs of aborted babies, etc is not liable to disciplinary action.

You stating that, to your knowledge, there has never been a problem… it is easy to see why. Teachers can live and believe whatever the heck they want, but when the rubber meets the road regarding Catholic identity, then all of the sudden, the archbishop is the enemy.
 
But the morality clause is needed for accountability. Otherwise, a teacher can simply state that their personal lifestyle, while it may be contrary to Catholic teaching, doesn’t impact their ability to teach. So a teacher who is living with their boyfriend or girlfriend, or has procured an abortion, or publicly advocates Planned Parenthood’s practice of harvesting the organs of aborted babies, etc is not liable to disciplinary action.

You stating that, to your knowledge, there has never been a problem… it is easy to see why. Teachers can live and believe whatever the heck they want, but when the rubber meets the road regarding Catholic identity, then all of the sudden, the archbishop is the enemy.
And that is the crux of the matter in these negotiations. I don’t have the language of the new contract but can get it fairly easily. I understand tho that the division of conduct is referred to as on-site only. If there are other concerns off-site, there is a provision for a hearing. That is what almost half the teachers objected to. No ministerial clause allowed but a hearing if concerns are brought up.

The biggest sticking point for the teachers union is that non-conservative Catholics teach at these four high schools. And they want a clear division between their teaching requirements and their personal lifestyles. There are many who practice birth control, have abortions, have fertility procedures, live with others outside of marriage, and of course are gay or lesbian. That has been the case for decades and according to the contract, can continue.

They don’t want the Archdiocese in their bedrooms.

I think that if the Archdiocese wants conservative Catholics only in their schools, both as staff as well as students, then they should shut down the current schools and totally restructure them.
 
They don’t want the Archdiocese in their bedrooms.

I think that if the Archdiocese wants conservative Catholics only in their schools, both as staff as well as students, then they should shut down the current schools and totally restructure them.
The Archdiocese probably wouldn’t be in their bedrooms if they didn’t make it public and happily teach things contrary to the church’s teaching.

Honestly, based on my personal experiences with Catholic schools and teachers, that would probably be a decent idea in many cases. At least for people who see “Catholic” in the name and expect their kids to get a “Catholic” education, not just public school experience with uniforms and a price tag.
 
The Archdiocese probably wouldn’t be in their bedrooms if they didn’t make it public and happily teach things contrary to the church’s teaching.
.
I don’t think anyone is teaching anything contrary to church teachings in their algebra or physics class. Really. The schools I know are all excellent. But they ARE diverse. And that means faculty too. Gay married folk. People who are not practicing Catholics. And for those people, they are living their lives in perfectly legal ways, just not conservative Catholic ways.

I think we’ll just have to see how the Archdiocese handles the situation over the school year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top