Additionally, it just seems that celibacy is an utterly unnecessary requirement. I don’t know what is practically gained by insisting on it. In fact, the handful of married Protestant ministers I know seem at least as good ministers to their flock as any priest could be. The experience of being married and raising a family probably makes it much easier for them to relate to the ordinary issues that the families of their churches deal with; a celibate priest living alone in a church rectory does not have that kind of experience.
I’ve known more than a handful of protestant minsters with families. The arrangement works well, if everyone in the family is as into serving the church as the minister is, but if not, it can be a disaster. There can be no unplanned weekend trips, and few planned ones. The needs of the church must often be put above the needs of the family- and that seems wrong to me. I do not envy the preachers’ kids I have known. Who do they go to when they need a pastor rather than a parent? Where do they turn to for support when they are struggling, and everyone in their church knows who they are and expects them to automatically be holier, more knowledgeable of the faith, and to have fewer needs than everyone else in the congregation? I’ve listened to many arguments in support of married clergy, and against priestly celibacy. Though I respect that it is a discipline, not a doctrine- and some rites of the Church allow for married clergy, I have never questioned my support for priestly celibacy.
Since it is a disciplne, by definition, it is not utterly necessary. I think that the Church is moving in the direction of having more married priests. It’s not like we don’t have a small number now. But although technically, the Pope could just change the discipline by decree, the change would require a complete reordering of the role of the priest in the Church today. Not the Sacramental role, of course, but the pastoral one. Priestly formation would be very different too and that does not change overnight. A married priest would likely have to do at least part of his formation together with his spouse similarly to the way deacon formation is conducted in many diocese. The Church stands to “miss out” on as many priests because the wife isn’t ready or able to undergo her own formation as we do by not having married priests at all.
It works for Protestant ministers, in part, because the role of a pastor is very different. Protestant ministers do not say daily Mass, for example, nor are they on hand 24/7 for the Sacraments of the Sick and for Reconcilliation.
Also, nearly all Protestant denominations have an acceptance of divorce. A divorced minister can continue in ministry. A divorced priest would not likely be able to continue in parish ministry but might be able to serve in an administrative or social ministry (ie prison or hospital ministry). The Church would have to have a plan for how to deal with a priest whose marriage fails, even if it is through no fault of his own.
Protestant ministers aren’t rotated regularly as priests are, either. This is another area that would need to be completely reassessed if the Church were to make married priests a more common occurance.