M
Malkin71
Guest
D.C. Archbishop Whurl response to V.P. Biden recieving NOW award at Georgetown is “expressing concern that it happened and noting the confusion that happens by having an event by entities that are at odds with Catholic teaching.”
newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/godingovernment/2009/04/dc_archbishop_nips_georgetown_for_biden_event.html
What is more a middle of the road answer is his comment on the President speaking at Notre Dame further on in the article. “the school should not have honored Obama but that he was not in favor of rescinding the invite.” When he was Bishop of Pittsburgh he was the same. He would not take the stand.
I am still wondering how these “Pro Abortion” people can speak at a Catholic institution? Worse, How can Archbishop Whurl be an Archbishop and not speak out. This is a prime case where you can have respect for the collar but not the person inside the collar.
newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/godingovernment/2009/04/dc_archbishop_nips_georgetown_for_biden_event.html
What is more a middle of the road answer is his comment on the President speaking at Notre Dame further on in the article. “the school should not have honored Obama but that he was not in favor of rescinding the invite.” When he was Bishop of Pittsburgh he was the same. He would not take the stand.
I am still wondering how these “Pro Abortion” people can speak at a Catholic institution? Worse, How can Archbishop Whurl be an Archbishop and not speak out. This is a prime case where you can have respect for the collar but not the person inside the collar.