Arctic scientist under investigation

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This link helps explain the co2 lags temperature thing. skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm. It is always important to check to see if something already has an explanation before assuming it is some unanswered problem.

Also ocean acidification basically is refering to the fact that the oceans ph is lowering or becoming more acidic not that it IS acidic right now!
 
40.png
kimmielittle:
Again, Kimmie, I can’t Correct Each of your innumerable tidbit one person opinions, questions to cast doubt, unsupported references; I use a Sign to Focus the Corrections for Focused viewing of the Big Data Sets, and Refutations, unquestionably,
  • There are Too Many Big References Proving the 90% Scientific Opinion affirming Beginning Global Warming,. It is only Begginning, Almost too larte to Prevent, as the Logarithmic Increase in CO2 last 2 centuuries shows.
    It's also shown that the '10%' of scientists Not supporting the GW almost universally acepted concept are on thr Manmade CO2 Industry payroll. Scientists are supposed to stay unbiased, not depend on payroll check.
 
Calliso said:
This link helps explain the co2 lags temperature thing. skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm. It is always important to check to see if something already has an explanation before assuming it is some unanswered problem.

Also ocean acidification basically is refering to the fact that the oceans ph is lowering or becoming more acidic not that it IS acidic right now!
Click to expand...
Again, the Oceans are BIG; it is the early Trends of acidification, and the Causes that are significant. I’ve had 100 Gallon Aquariums, requiring Ph study, for Lamprolugus Leilupi Breedingm, when they were New in the USA. It is also a major concern that Coral Leafs are rapidly disappearing, Because of Man’s Waste influence; Coral Leafs are the Breeding Ground, like formally isolated beaches, for Basic Sea Life.
Code: 
                                                                                                                     In overview, there is Major Concern, the  Vatican Included,  that  We Humans   are  Literally  Destroying the  Ideal  Planet Home that  God Created for us.  Several  religious Leaders have expressed concern.                                                                                      For Instance,   What   would happen   When   Ocean Levels Rise  10  or more feet,
  • because of Far more Rapid Greenland, Arctic and Antarctic Ice Melting, discovered the last 2 Decades?

    Let our Grandchildren worry about it 150 years from no? NO; We need to Prevent Now, while we can.

    Sea levels would rise 27 Feet, when the Greenland Ice Sheep alone melts. Don’t worry? Don’t try to Prevent, while it’s easy, cheap Now? Forget Responsibility, Social Concern?
    :hey_bud::dts:
 
Remember the ‘1088/1800’ Scientists refuting Global Warming in the 1990s? The List was preposterously Phony; Very few were even Scientists or Knowledgeable of Global Warming. They were in Fact found to be GOP Type Financial Contributors,or anti GW contributors or such, their Names and credentials were Posted on this very site, but since unavailable here. The Anti-Global-Warming small minority have repeatedly been proven to be Phony, and GW Connected Industry, etc.
How much Science, Scientific Method education have you had, Kimmie? You described yourself as a Student. I'm Bachelor of Science Traditional Jesuit Golden Era College Graduate; Fr Eisle, Chair of Science, wass Nationally Recognized Earthquake Direction Regulart News, and had Participated in Integration Marches, with otgher Catholic Clergy, in the Pre-Integration moves of the 1950's. We Know Morality, what is Moral, what is Immoral. It's the Nature of Catholicism.
 
Calliso said:
Also ocean acidification basically is refering to the fact that the oceans ph is lowering or becoming more acidic not that it IS acidic right now!
Click to expand...
Actually wrong.

What is being measured is alkalinity - alkalinization. 7.0 - above

To become MORE acidic the measure of pH would have to be lower than 7.0 neutral ].

Solutions with a pH less than 7 are said to be acidic and solutions with a pH greater than 7 are basic or alkaline.

Seawater pH is limited to the range 7.5 to 8.4.

“Ocean Acidification” IS a Public Relation AGW combination of scare words…
 
Calliso said:
This link helps explain the co2 lags temperature thing. skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm. It is always important to check to see if something already has an explanation before assuming it is some unanswered problem.
Click to expand...
I’ll gladly accept Milankovitch cycles as part of the answer to the Time lag.🙂

However, they are cycles…not constants. SO can NOT explain away ALL the time lag. The Time lag shows across quarter of a million years. I don’t accept John Cooks explanation…about Milankovitch cycles and CO2 interaction.

friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FOS%20Essay/Climate_Change_Science.html
Both ice volume reconstructions therefore support the Milankovitch hypothesis and show that the Sun is the dominant climate driver…kinda leaves CO2 as the dominant driver as AGW claims…🤷🤷
 
AntalKalnoky said:
Again, Kimmie, I can’t Correct Each of your innumerable tidbit one person opinions, questions to cast doubt, unsupported references;
Click to expand...
Isn’t it a fact you can’t scientifically correct ANY of my contentions to your unsubstantiated claims 😃
It’s also shown that the ‘10%’ of scientists Not supporting the GW almost universally acepted concept are on thr Manmade CO2 Industry payroll. Scientists are supposed to stay unbiased, not depend on payroll check.
Click to expand...
You’ve been repeatedly asked for proof of this statement…

Your fallacies in Logic - are amazing 🙂
 
AntalKalnoky said:
I’ve had 100 Gallon Aquariums, requiring Ph study, for Lamprolugus Leilupi Breedingm, when they were
Click to expand...
Then you should know the pH for Neolamprologus leleupi

Recommended water values are: pH: 8 - 9,

You are measuring for Alkalinization. 🙂
 
AntalKalnoky said:
How much Science, Scientific Method education have you had, Kimmie? You described yourself as a Student. I’m Bachelor of Science
Click to expand...
And you don’t know or recognize the difference between Alkalinization and Acidification - AMAZING 😃
We Know Morality, what is Moral, what is Immoral. It’s the Nature of Catholicism.
Click to expand...
The old CAF AGW’ers fall-back when they can’t debate the missing Science 😃

“I’m more moral”

Fact check: If you can’t give the scientific evidence for your claims - You don’t have a “moral Ground” to come from. 🤷
 
kimmielittle said:
Actually wrong.

What is being measured is alkalinity - alkalinization. 7.0 - above

To become MORE acidic the measure of pH would have to be lower than 7.0 neutral ]. [SIGN]Please see below, Kimmie: “MORE acidic” does Not require Below Ph7. 🤓:tiphat:[/SIGN]Solutions with a pH less than 7 are said to be acidic and solutions with a pH greater than 7 are basic or alkaline.

Seawater pH is limited to the range 7.5 to 8.4.

“Ocean Acidification” IS a Public Relation AGW combination of scare words…
Click to expand...
He was correct; It has been Proven by Data that there is a slight Trend for Oceans to trend toward Acidic, not alkaline. Acidification, is the * Trend*, the Direction of Ocean Ph, not that it Has Become Acidic. The Word Acidification Means Trending to more acidic. Please look it up in a Dictionary.
 
kimmielittle said:
And you don’t know or recognize the difference between Alkalinization and Acidification - AMAZING 😃

I know the Precise definitions and Measurements of Acid, Alkaline, Acidification, Alkalinization, not only from High School Chemistry but Specifically assuring Ph for the Newly Imported Lamprologus Leleupi (sic) I bought for successful Breeding, from a retired FBI Agent Cichlid Lover. His Air Freight Packing and Shiping February 1981 Freezinfg Weather did No Harm to the Tropical Amazonian Breeding Pair.

Why do you Attack me Knowingly Falselly, Kimmie; I previously Informed you Twice of my Detailed Ph Knowledge and Experience. False Attacks on Another, as well as ‘Stalking’ my Every response, Falselly Trying to Prove me wrong, are Serious Violations of CAF TOS.

The old CAF AGW’ers fall-back when they can’t debate the missing Science 😃

“I’m more moral”. No one said that, certainly me; I Cite Catholic Teaching on Morality. Why the false innuendo Personal Attack, Kimmie, Again? CAF TOS violation.
Fact check: If you can’t give the scientific evidence for your claims - You don’t have a “moral Ground” to come from. 🤷
Click to expand...
False Attack again, Kimmie: Personal False attack, TOS Violation on CAF. I Always give Definitive Scientific refutations of your narrow anti Science data, anti GW slanted attascks.
 
kimmielittle said:
Then you should know the pH for Neolamprologus leleupi

Recommended water values are: pH: 8 - 9,

You are measuring for Alkalinization. 🙂 Incorrect. I measured for Alkalinity, not “…Ization” Totally different Chemical wording.
  • I Know what I was doing; it was close to Tapwater Ph in that City; I found I need not be concerned. False innuendo demeaning Attack again, Kimmie: TOS Violation on CAF. Why do you continue to Stalk me, Trying whithout Any Success to prove me wrong, Kimmie?
Natural Tapwater Ph was 7.8, close enough; they did Breed successfully, was Among first in USA to. CAF TOS WARNING, Kimmie: Stop Stalking me, Trying to prove every detail I write False, and Personal Innuendo attacks. You reported Me TOTALLY Falselly for TOS violations UI did not do. Before, for which I received False TOS points, in Answering your Then Staliking me Always Trying to prove me wrong, as Now. Am notifying You on your SN also.
Click to expand...
 
kimmielittle said:
I’ll gladly accept Milankovitch cycles as part of the answer to the Time lag.🙂

However, they are cycles…not constants. SO can NOT explain away ALL the time lag. The Time lag shows across quarter of a million years. I don’t accept John Cooks explanation…about Milankovitch cycles and CO2 interaction.

friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FOS%20Essay/Climate_Change_Science.html
Both ice volume reconstructions therefore support the Milankovitch hypothesis and show that the Sun is the dominant climate driver…kinda leaves CO2 as the dominant driver as AGW claims…🤷🤷
Click to expand...
Again, a totally Slanted Partial selective ‘science’ agenda AGW site, by One Canadian, posting as a Science WEB, instead of One Biased AGW opinion. Water Vapor is Not a “Greenhouse Gas”, he leaves Methane and other Greenhouse gases out in his Written summarry, Slanted AGW Link, Kimmie. He also conveniently Ignores the Logarthimic Record high in 650,000 years CO2 Increase, last 200 years Industrialization Which Isd the Entire Concern for Future Generations. CO2 is still Barelly Arrestable Now; That is why wee had Kyoto and Dutch accords, U.S. Big Money Carbonatious have fought with These types AGW ‘bunk’, LOL. :dancing::extrahappy::tsktsk: Again, 'Debunking GW" is by a few isolated Connected usually with Carbonasceous Emitters webs, 10 % at Most Connected financially AGW scientists. There are many “Debunking the Debunkers” sites; but I don’t have time to search Each.
 
Why “baselines” are Important in science

The Temperature of Cream that has not reached a freeze temperature THE “baseline” ] can not be measured as ICE CREAM. You are measuring “Creams” Temperature - NOT ICE CREAMS Temperature…

It’s called a ‘baseline’

“Seawater” pH is limited to the range 7.5 to 8.4. and stably constrained.

A 7.0 pH is a “neutral”

THE “baseline” is below 7.0 for Acid.

A pH of below 7.0 is not measuring “Seawater” - NOW you are measuring ACID.

Without Acid being present Below 7.0 pH ] You can not measure MORE Acidification.
 
AntalKalnoky said:
Code: 
                  CAF   TOS WARNING,  Kimmie:  Stop   *Stalking me*,  Trying  to prove  every  detail I   write  False,  and Personal   Innuendo  attacks.  You  reported Me    TOTALLY  Falselly  for TOS  violations UI  did not  do.   Before,  for  which I  received  False  TOS   points,  in   Answering your  Then Staliking  me  Always   Trying to prove me wrong,  as Now.    Am notifying You on your  SN    also.
Click to expand...
Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about :confused:
 
kimmielittle said:
Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about :confused:
Click to expand...
I am talking about you CONTINOUSLY Continuing to Stalk (Follow me non-stop) Trying to Falselly Disprove my every Post, and Personally False Inuendo attack Me. Those are Several Catholic Answer Forum Terms of Service Violations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top