S
StAnastasia
Guest
Tony, I’m not a fan of eternal punishment, and I do understand why a lot of young people today are quite turned off Christianity by punitive and damnatory rhetoric. I would be too if I had ever paid much attention to hell and damnation, rather than to God’s salvific love.
- St Thomas was not infallible!
- The blessed have compassion for the damned.
- They do not rejoice because the damned are suffering but because they love God and know God loves them.
- They accept the suffering of the damned even though they love them because they know the damned reject God and all those who love God.
- Their joy is not lessened because they know **everyone is obtaining what they choose.
**6. They also know they could not co-exist in harmony with those who reject God.- The damned are prepared to pay the price of being totally independent.
- God allows the damned to reject Him because our freedom is more valuable than anything else and without freedom we are incapable of love.
- Even though the damned reject God He loves them because they are His children and His perfect love is absolute and unconditional.
- God permits evil and suffering because all love entails sacrifice.
NB These are my views and I don’t claim to be infallible!
The problem remains how a parent can be perfectly happy in heaven while knowing that her little one is boiling in oil (or whatever imaginative metaphor you prefer). I see no coherent argument for how a parent could be perfectly and eternally happy unless the memory of her now tortured little child is completely expunged.
In any case, it’s a moot point as far as I’m concerned. I would rather spend eternity in the imagined “lake of fire” than five minutes in the presence of a God who would create a hideous system in which (in St. Thomas words) "The saints rejoice in the accomplishment of God’s justice, and to this extent it can be said that they joy in the pains of the damned. "
StAnastasia