S
stbruno
Guest
laloyolan.com/opinion/lmu-s-distinctly-catholic-mission-1.1737627
This is a partial exerpt from a professor at Loyola Marymount University in LA who thinks its already in progress.
LMU’s distinctly Catholic mission?
Christopher Kaczor, Associate Professor of Philosophy
**Updated: **Thursday, April 30, 2009
What does the future of LMU hold in terms of its Catholic character? The “prima facie” case for total secularization is fairly simple. As everyone knows, virtually all private universities in the United States began with a strong religious affiliation, and many of all these universities are now fully secularized. The trend toward secularization is strong. Any strong force, unless resisted by an equally strong force, has its way.
Will LMU be an exception to this trend? Many people believe so, and I certainly hope so. However, I am seriously concerned. There are many facets that make up LMU’s Catholic identity, but let’s consider some ways in which LMU differs from other universities, in particular, its student body, faculty, core requirements, Jesuit President and symbolic ties. Each of these is in serious jeopardy of becoming merely like every other university.
Over the past ten years, the percentage of Catholic students at LMU has steadily decreased. During this time, Catholics have increased in absolute numbers and as a percentage of the population in California, where LMU draws the vast majority of its students. According to Melinda Roper, director of student life at Cal Lutheran University, Cal Lutheran now has a higher percentage of Catholic students than LMU. Predicted time to total secularity: ten years.
The percentage of Catholic faculty is plummeting even faster. Perhaps a majority of full professors at LMU are still Catholic, but my informal faculty survey indicates a very small minority of assistant or associate professors are Catholics. The exact numbers are not available since LMU (unlike, for instance, the University of Notre Dame) does not keep track of religious affiliation, despite meticulous record keeping about the race and gender of the faculty…Symbolic ties will probably be cut last. Already, the change in our University logo from a depiction of Sacred Heart Chapel to the current LMU|LA logo is not without significance (LaMULA). Our current logo contains, we are told, subtle religious symbolism, indeed so understated as to be completely unnoticeable to the untutored eye, a perfect symbol for the future of LMU. At some point, the crucifixes will come out of the classrooms. LMU’s mottos “ad majorem dei gloriam” and “tua luce dirige” will be deleted, or at least be modified (“ad majorem gloriam” and “luce dirige”?). There will come a time when Sacred Heart Chapel comes into greater conformity with wider University culture. The Eucharist will be permanently removed so that the space can be used for a variety of services and concerts. There will be an argument about whether the distinctively religious art should remain. A compromise will likely be struck whereby the pieces considered offensive – such as the central crucifix and the statue of Mary – are removed but the stained glass windows remain intact, a silent reminder of a long lost tradition.
This is a partial exerpt from a professor at Loyola Marymount University in LA who thinks its already in progress.
LMU’s distinctly Catholic mission?
Christopher Kaczor, Associate Professor of Philosophy
**Updated: **Thursday, April 30, 2009
What does the future of LMU hold in terms of its Catholic character? The “prima facie” case for total secularization is fairly simple. As everyone knows, virtually all private universities in the United States began with a strong religious affiliation, and many of all these universities are now fully secularized. The trend toward secularization is strong. Any strong force, unless resisted by an equally strong force, has its way.
Will LMU be an exception to this trend? Many people believe so, and I certainly hope so. However, I am seriously concerned. There are many facets that make up LMU’s Catholic identity, but let’s consider some ways in which LMU differs from other universities, in particular, its student body, faculty, core requirements, Jesuit President and symbolic ties. Each of these is in serious jeopardy of becoming merely like every other university.
Over the past ten years, the percentage of Catholic students at LMU has steadily decreased. During this time, Catholics have increased in absolute numbers and as a percentage of the population in California, where LMU draws the vast majority of its students. According to Melinda Roper, director of student life at Cal Lutheran University, Cal Lutheran now has a higher percentage of Catholic students than LMU. Predicted time to total secularity: ten years.
The percentage of Catholic faculty is plummeting even faster. Perhaps a majority of full professors at LMU are still Catholic, but my informal faculty survey indicates a very small minority of assistant or associate professors are Catholics. The exact numbers are not available since LMU (unlike, for instance, the University of Notre Dame) does not keep track of religious affiliation, despite meticulous record keeping about the race and gender of the faculty…Symbolic ties will probably be cut last. Already, the change in our University logo from a depiction of Sacred Heart Chapel to the current LMU|LA logo is not without significance (LaMULA). Our current logo contains, we are told, subtle religious symbolism, indeed so understated as to be completely unnoticeable to the untutored eye, a perfect symbol for the future of LMU. At some point, the crucifixes will come out of the classrooms. LMU’s mottos “ad majorem dei gloriam” and “tua luce dirige” will be deleted, or at least be modified (“ad majorem gloriam” and “luce dirige”?). There will come a time when Sacred Heart Chapel comes into greater conformity with wider University culture. The Eucharist will be permanently removed so that the space can be used for a variety of services and concerts. There will be an argument about whether the distinctively religious art should remain. A compromise will likely be struck whereby the pieces considered offensive – such as the central crucifix and the statue of Mary – are removed but the stained glass windows remain intact, a silent reminder of a long lost tradition.