T
tonyfish58
Guest
Dear Servant - You are correctI don’t think Tony was referring to Christianity
.
God Bless all and Regards Tony
Dear Servant - You are correctI don’t think Tony was referring to Christianity
.
Dear Nixbits - This is a different topic, so please see this thread if you have questions.Really? So you’re just going to igore the massacres in the Old Testament, ignore the Crusades, ignore the Inquisition? Those acts were not demonstrations of love.
And how could you have known? They wouldn’t outright state that they were promoting the Baha’i faith, but that is exactly what Tony was doing. Be careful that we stay on topic which is “Are Christians Losing the Apologetics War with Islam”, not how great the Baha’i faith may or may not be.@tonyfish58. Apologies, Tony, I misunderstood your post. And thank you to Servant19 for pointing out my error.
Did he even ask for you to provide him more information on the Baha’i faith? Why don’t you just stick to the subject matter of the thread, Tony, which has nothing at all to do with the Baha’i faith.Dear Nixbits - This is a different topic, so please see this thread if you have questions.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=12474416#post12474416
God Bless and Regards Tony
We are all created by the same God, the same God hears all our prayers, we have a Christian duty to love everyone in Iraq as we love ourself, we are to love and pray for our enemies. Instead, America and Britain chose to bomb Iraq, thousands died, and two million people fled their country, leaving everything behind. How will these refugees get justice?I think we are losing the apologetics battle with Islam only in some circles. I think most of the world can see what these folks (ISIS and their ilk) are made of. If actions speak louder than words the message should be deafening. If ever a just war presented itself, it is the war against this evil.
Not to mention the massive power vacuum that allowed ISIS to take power. If we are going to completely topple a countries government we have a responsibility to set one back up but instead we just left and now we got ISIS.We are all created by the same God, the same God hears all our prayers, we have a Christian duty to love everyone in Iraq as we love ourself, we are to love and pray for our enemies. Instead, America and Britain chose to bomb Iraq, thousands died, and two million people fled their country, leaving everything behind. How will these refugees get justice?
We might live in fear of this evil, because deep down we know we are part of the cause, how did we love them as we love our selves?
Sorry, I did overlook this minor point, and I am not sure how we were loving and praying for our enemies whilst doing it.Not to mention the massive power vacuum that allowed ISIS to take power. If we are going to completely topple a countries government we have a responsibility to set one back up but instead we just left and now we got ISIS.
Yes. I do understand if we had to go in to stop injustice or protect the innocent but toppling a government that had nothing to do with 9/11 and the death of over 100,000 civilians alone dosnt meet just war theory.Sorry, I did overlook this minor point, and I am not sure how we were loving and praying for our enemies whilst doing it.
Absolutely! Especially in our universities…Randy,
So long as Islamists continue to behead people, I don’t see them winning the propaganda war. I am far more concerned about the propaganda war we are ***not ***winning against western, progressive secularists, the recent election notwithstanding.
Jon
Yeah, that kind of sums it up, doesn’t it?Islam’s central problem
Posted on 8 October 2014 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
wdtprs.com/blog/2014/10/islams-central-problem/
I saw this at Jihad Watch and thought…. “Yep.”
On the heals of the Feast of the Holy Rosary (Our Lady of Victory)…
Where is the border between Islam and Islamism? The media says that the two are different as night and day; Islam is a religion of peace, and the Islamists have stolen the name. [Does anyone believe that?] Others believe that Islamism represents the traditional, pure Islam, true to the Koran.
This latter view is advanced, remarkably enough, by a theologian Martin Rhonheimer from a university endorsed by the Pope. He is a professor at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome and wrote an essay on this particular distinction in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
You do not hear many official Muslim voices condemning Islamic State, says Rhonheimer. And when it finally happens, it is usually only to condemn the bestiality because it harms Islam’s reputation. The Islamic State is no heresy, [that is, straying from core Islam] but “a recurring pattern in the history of violent expansion. The model is Muhammad himself.”
“Islamic State’s legitimation finds its basis in the Koran and Islamic law, the Sharia,” believes the Catholic professor. He states: “You will find no arguments within Muslim theology that can be used to condemn Islamic State’s behavior as un-Islamic.”…
Martin Rhonheimer then goes through the suras in the Quran that prescribe what should happen to the conquered Christians and Jews, and points out that the Islamic State strictly adheres to these regulations. Islam would like to influence the state and society in details, emphasizes Rhonheimer.
“Islam is more than a religion. It is cult with political and social rules and unites religion and and political and social order in one. And it has always been violent,” he says…]
Moderate Islam has its advocates, often professors at Western universities.
“But they are confronted with Islam’s central problem: when they return to Islam’s origin, they come across the warlike, expansionist Islam from Medina, the legitimacy of killing for Allah’s honor and a violent Muhammad,” writes Rhonheimer.
And is Father someone who could be considered an expert on the subject matter; or is his status as a professor, a theologian, and member of staff at a Pontifical university being used in a good example of appealing to authority?Islam’s central problem
Posted on 8 October 2014 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
wdtprs.com/blog/2014/10/islams-central-problem/
I saw this at Jihad Watch and thought…. “Yep.”
On the heals of the Feast of the Holy Rosary (Our Lady of Victory)…
Where is the border between Islam and Islamism? The media says that the two are different as night and day; Islam is a religion of peace, and the Islamists have stolen the name. [Does anyone believe that?] Others believe that Islamism represents the traditional, pure Islam, true to the Koran.
This latter view is advanced, remarkably enough, by a theologian Martin Rhonheimer from a university endorsed by the Pope. He is a professor at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome and wrote an essay on this particular distinction in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
You do not hear many official Muslim voices condemning Islamic State, says Rhonheimer. And when it finally happens, it is usually only to condemn the bestiality because it harms Islam’s reputation. The Islamic State is no heresy, [that is, straying from core Islam] but “a recurring pattern in the history of violent expansion. The model is Muhammad himself.”
“Islamic State’s legitimation finds its basis in the Koran and Islamic law, the Sharia,” believes the Catholic professor. He states: “You will find no arguments within Muslim theology that can be used to condemn Islamic State’s behavior as un-Islamic.”…
Martin Rhonheimer then goes through the suras in the Quran that prescribe what should happen to the conquered Christians and Jews, and points out that the Islamic State strictly adheres to these regulations. Islam would like to influence the state and society in details, emphasizes Rhonheimer.
“Islam is more than a religion. It is cult with political and social rules and unites religion and and political and social order in one. And it has always been violent,” he says…]
Moderate Islam has its advocates, often professors at Western universities.
“But they are confronted with Islam’s central problem: when they return to Islam’s origin, they come across the warlike, expansionist Islam from Medina, the legitimacy of killing for Allah’s honor and a violent Muhammad,” writes Rhonheimer.