Are most people going to Hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hermione
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
oriel36:
Catholicism in America appears to be heading for an odd mixture of Protestant fundamentalism warmed up with a heavy dose of phychobabble,rather than fire and brimstone you can get a 12 step program to heaven.If that fails call your lawyer.

His Majesty manifests Himself in all ages and in all times for there is nowhere God is not,I am sure that other people in history have believed that their dire positions through wars or disease marked so final descent to better times but what is happening here is a descent to mediocrity and that has no ending.

I would prefer hell in order to know what I was missing in heaven than mediocrity which knows neither.What you are doing to my Catholic tradition for your effiminate phychobabble existence which drugs what it cannot face even though by definition, Christian faith insists that difficult phases come and go can never constitute any form of belief. Why,when most here have more luxury than most are finding yourselves victims,are you so spoilt that you imagine God owes you Spiritual and material happiness.

There are no more heroes,there are only those who work for pay who you call professional and I call indoctrinated.Doing something only faith and Christ can do may be a lonely road at time but the single and gentle idea of a Catholic community by its very presence accomplishes more than any programmed path a man devises.

“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. 12The hired hand is not the shepherd who owns the sheep. So when he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. 13The man runs away because he works for pay and cares nothing for the sheep. "

You bought into the empirical myths whether it is the structure and motion of planets and stars or the structure of the mind,while the former is easily dealt with the latter is an awful attempt by the blind to lead those who are Spiritually adrift and who need only simple things to ease their pain,often this is Sunday mass or confession.
Huh ??? What in the world are you trying to say here ?

The only thing that even comes close to saying anything understandable, is your last statement that maybe mass and confession is the solution to the problem.

Can you please explain to us poh folks with very tiny IQs, what the first few paragraphs are alluding to ?

Thanks, wc
 
**HERMEONI, You said the following,"**I agree that using birth control is a sin, it’s not right etc. etc. But is it really so bad that people who do it deserve eternal punishment?

I just can’t believe that a loving God would create a place of torment for users of birth control, miss-ers of Mass, and for that matter even adulterers and homosexuals. Why wouldn’t God put all those people into purgatory so that they’d have a chance of going to Heaven?

I don’t think homosexuality, or adultery, or for that matter even murder is bad enough to merit INFINITE TORTURE"

Read your sentance in BLUE. You have a weak understanding of Purgatory. If one goes to Purgatory that soul will go to heaven sometime. You say “Have a chance”- that is wrong.

You have almost said God is a liar. He did talk about hell and so did Jesus talk about hell. You say you can’t believe that God can create hell.

Let me tell you a fundamental bit of Theology. If there is a “good” there has to ne a “bad”. If there is an up there has to be a down. If there is a heaven there has to be a hell. What did God do to Sodom and Gamorra? They were full of homosexuals so God destroyed them. What do you think about that?
 
40.png
clarkal:
Then where was my peace? I never had any when I was a Catholic.
As I do not know you, I cannot comment on your peace. What I do know is that many others in a similar situation (myself included) have found hope through the advice of a good priest and/or counseling. Life is not “sinners in the hands of an angry God”, where God is just waiting for us to fall into hell. On the contrary, God WANTS people to be in heaven with him enough to have sent his own Son to die for them all.
40.png
clarkal:
Atheism is easier than Christianity, yet you are too weak to handle it. You want to kill yourself! Interesting.
You admit it yourself. Atheism is easier than Christianity. And somehow I’m weak because I try the harder option? I don’t want to kill myself AT ALL, but if I believed that life had no purpose, then I would certainly consider it (and in fact, the times when I’ve flirted with atheism have been the most depressing points of my life).
40.png
clarkal:
You have a very immature understanding of atheism. It is not bleak, and atheists are not hedonists. Atheists make their own purpose in life. We do not need a “divine being” or an “afterlife” for purpose. Morals are not pointless, especially when it comes to hurting other people or your own body. You should not “go out and sin” for those reasons.
On the contrary, I perhaps understand the implications of atheism better than you do. I never said that atheists are hedonists or depressed. I have known some very happy, well rounded atheists. If they are truly not hedonists and they are truly not depressed, perhaps it is because their heart has more sense than their head. All human beings know inherently, as the Apostle Paul taught, the law of God. And they attempt to follow it to some extent, good! However, if an atheist truly took his creed seriously, where would his basis for morals come from? Would he be moral just because he felt like it? What if he didn’t feel like it? If you admit that actions are truly right and wrong in and of themselves, then there is basis for trying to do the right and avoid the wrong. You might like to live in peace with all mankind, but if actions are not truly right and wrong, then where is the logical basis for doing so? After all, it’s just your preference. What if I prefer to go around destroying cities at will (much like many ancient/modern barbarians)? Who’s to say that my preference isn’t just as good as your preference? Perhaps you would say that love for yourself and others is better than hate/indifference. Good! We agree there. But you’ve just made a moral judgement. And unless love is just a preference, then there must logically be some reason that love is “good” and hate is “bad”.
40.png
clarkal:
If a lake of fire to punish people for eternity doesn’t exist, life becomes more troubling? :eek:
Yes, more troubling. Supposing that someone beat me up, stole all my money, ran away, was never caught by the law, and eventually died unrepentant. You mean to tell me that a universe in which such a person never realizes or cares that he/she has done a terrible wrong is really less troubling than the concept of hell? You’ve got to be kidding me! Yes, I can reconcile eternal punishment for the unrepentant, but I cannot reconcile eternal peace for the unrepentant.

As a final note, I don’t actually want to go around destroying cities at will. I just happen to be fond of interesting hypotheticals 🙂
 
40.png
wcknight:
Huh ??? What in the world are you trying to say here ?

The only thing that even comes close to saying anything understandable, is your last statement that maybe mass and confession is the solution to the problem.

Can you please explain to us poh folks with very tiny IQs, what the first few paragraphs are alluding to ?

Thanks, wc
The phychobabble of the 20th century began with Freud and ended with chat show feelgood sentiments.The phychobabble nonsense sucks the virtue of human dignity and especially among those who can and do suffer,allied with the legal industry and the drug companies it generates tons of money because the modern selfish mind can’t bear a moment of suffering and considers itself to be a victim of either man or God when it feels down or things don’t go their way.

You bought into things like ’ intelligent quotients’ from the empirical tradition which pidegeonhole people and imagine wisdom can be quantified ,even when these people are some of the dumbest people ever to set foot on the planet.

I detest the dilution of Catholic wisdom to this artificial and pretensious nonsense that you call physchology and I call indoctrination.At least the old commies had a good handle on how to make emprical science work in favor of demolishing Christianity and it may well happen in America

geocities.com/Heartland/7006/psychopolitics-pt2.html#anchor9
 
40.png
clarkal:
Then where was my peace? I never had any when I was a Catholic.

I agree. I didn’t reject God because of my psychological problems. I first rejected Catholicism because it didn’t make sense. I then became a deist, but later rejected God because I realized that such a being also didn’t make sense.
l
Truth, makes perfect sense. It’s just not easy, you, for whatever reason, felt you needed to stop seeking the truth…
40.png
clarkal:
However, I am worried about Hermione’s well-being, so I counsel her to abandon her beliefs that don’t make sense to her. Would you rather have her go insane and end up in a straight-jacket for the rest of her life or simply abandon her beliefs?

clarkal
Your intentions I am certain are good, but you are not helping her with this advice.
 
40.png
Hermione:
As I understand it, most people are going to Hell. Jesus Himself says so in the Bible when he says that the road to hell is wide, and the gate to Heaven is narrow and few enter it or something like that.

Furthermore, the Catechism says that no one is deemed ignorant of the moral law written in our conscience (or something similar), so people who deliberately and with full knowledge commit adultery, murder, theft etc. are in mortal sin even if they never heard of Catholicism. Right?

olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml is a sermon by a saint, and here are some quotes:

So is it true that most people are going to Hell?

Thanks! 🙂
There is an indication in Scripture that about one-third will end-up in Hell…

3 Then another sign appeared in the sky; it was a huge red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on its heads were seven diadems. 4 Its tail swept away a third of the stars in the sky and hurled them down to the earth. Revelation 12:3-4.
 
40.png
mattkennel:
As I do not know you, I cannot comment on your peace. What I do know is that many others in a similar situation (myself included) have found hope through the advice of a good priest and/or counseling. Life is not “sinners in the hands of an angry God”, where God is just waiting for us to fall into hell. On the contrary, God WANTS people to be in heaven with him enough to have sent his own Son to die for them all.
I am glad that you found hope in the advise of a priest, but I, and many other atheists, find that hope completely empty and baseless.
40.png
mattkennel:
You admit it yourself. Atheism is easier than Christianity. And somehow I’m weak because I try the harder option? I don’t want to kill myself AT ALL, but if I believed that life had no purpose, then I would certainly consider it (and in fact, the times when I’ve flirted with atheism have been the most depressing points of my life).
No, I don’t. My point was that you said that atheism was easier than Christianity, yet you would probably kill yourself if you were an atheist. Maybe I misunderstood you. I apologize if I did.
40.png
mattkennel:
All human beings know inherently, as the Apostle Paul taught, the law of God. And they attempt to follow it to some extent, good!
Cultures have had different moralities regarding polygamy, incest, infanticide, cannibalism, suicide, prostitution and sex, etc.

How come the ‘law of God’ was not obvious to them?
40.png
mattkennel:
However, if an atheist truly took his creed seriously, where would his basis for morals come from? Would he be moral just because he felt like it? What if he didn’t feel like it? If you admit that actions are truly right and wrong in and of themselves, then there is basis for trying to do the right and avoid the wrong. You might like to live in peace with all mankind, but if actions are not truly right and wrong, then where is the logical basis for doing so? After all, it’s just your preference. What if I prefer to go around destroying cities at will (much like many ancient/modern barbarians)? Who’s to say that my preference isn’t just as good as your preference? Perhaps you would say that love for yourself and others is better than hate/indifference. Good! We agree there. But you’ve just made a moral judgement. And unless love is just a preference, then there must logically be some reason that love is “good” and hate is “bad”.
I believe that the basis of morality is a reasonable application of the golden rule, which was around before Jesus. Actions may be deemed right and wrong on the basis of their destructiveness. You appear to be making the leap that because morals exist, they must be the laws of an invisible supernatural being. I disagree with this.

For an interesting read on the subject from an atheistic point of view, check out Richard Carrier’s book entitled Sense and Goodness without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism.

secweb.org/bookstore/books.asp
matkennell:
Yes, more troubling. Supposing that someone beat me up, stole all my money, ran away, was never caught by the law, and eventually died unrepentant. You mean to tell me that a universe in which such a person never realizes or cares that he/she has done a terrible wrong is really less troubling than the concept of hell? You’ve got to be kidding me! /quote]

Absolutely. If someone beat me up and stole all my money, I would be very angry. However, I would have it that the person not be brought to justice than burn in a lake of fire for all eternity. It does not fit the crime. Nothing does. I wouldn’t even wish it on Hitler or Stalin.

I brought this up in another post, but what do you think about the monkeys? When injustice is done to them, they try to retaliate. What happens when they do not get justice? Do the bad, unrepentant monkeys burn in a lake of fire?

It makes more sense to me that the universe is simply an unfair place than to believe that there exists an invisible world with a lake of fire that no one can verify where the unjust will suffer for eternity. It seems to me to be simply human wishful thinking.

clarkal
 
40.png
CatholicHoser:
Not able to contact a few past friends or girlfriends to forgive them.
You don’t need to be able to contact them. Just write it down, pray over it, and either file it away or shred it (or burn it).
 
40.png
Mijoy2:
Truth, makes perfect sense. It’s just not easy, you, for whatever reason, felt you needed to stop seeking the truth…
What? I stopped seeking the truth because I have decided to reject the idea of an invisible being? To me, that’s like saying because I have rejected the existence of fairies, I have stopped seeking the truth.
 
40.png
clarkal:
What? I stopped seeking the truth because I have decided to reject the idea of an invisible being? To me, that’s like saying because I have rejected the existence of fairies, I have stopped seeking the truth.
Nobody can really give up on God and more often than not this disatisfaction is a encouraging sign to go beyond the conceptions learned through geographic and cultural accidents.Every Christian writer of worth acknowledges that period of uneasiness and no better example was Paul who was out hunting Christians before his molten mind was struck by the Christian Way.

Christianity is a direct result of God made man or God made flesh and I never heard of God describe as an ‘invisible’ anything,being or otherwise.

Love may be invisible but that is God and the human story of Christ

"Whoever is without love does not know God, for God is love. "

usccb.org/nab/bible/1john/1john4.htm

The contemporary mind finds this akward period to be a symptom of some terminal condition when it is the first signs of the new birth where you see Christianity with a new set of eyes.

I believe in evil and how it strangles the seeds as they flourish and manifest themselves in that period of perceived unhappiness or irritation but this has always been a feature of the life of the great Christians.Today the strangulation happens with drugs or in seeking counselling which identifies all things as illness of the mind.It is not,it is the breaking of the Spiritual presence through the natural man.

Without prejudice,review examples of this great Christian transition in a way that is more gentle than I could.

ccel.org/ccel/underhill/mysticism.iv.ii.html
 
40.png
clarkal:
Cultures have had different moralities regarding polygamy, incest, infanticide, cannibalism, suicide, prostitution and sex, etc.

How come the ‘law of God’ was not obvious to them?
Of course, sin begets a darkening of conscience. Nonetheless, the basic moral law (especially the Golden Rule, which you are correct in respecting). I’d urge you to read C.S. Lewis’ The Abolition of Man. Among other things, it has an excellent appendix that demonstrates how many moral principles go accross different cultures.
40.png
clarkal:
You appear to be making the leap that because morals exist, they must be the laws of an invisible supernatural being. I disagree with this.
I wouldn’t call that a leap of faith or logic. However, I’d at least say that morals must come from some place other than the human mind. If they simply originate in the mind, then they are preferences and not laws with the power to bind. This has been realized by atheists in the past. As an example of this consider the theory advocated by Raskolnikov in the novel Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky. He says that certain men have the right and duty to go beyond morals because they are supermen. Such a theory, in my opinion, is inevitably where atheistic ethics leads.
Therefore, I’d say that truly binding morals must be true in and of themselves, and not simply come from the human mind. But, if they are true in and of themselves then there must be some reason why they are true. The best explanation I can find for this is God.
As an aside, I’d really recommend to everyone reading Dostoevsky. In both Crime and Punishment and the Brothers Karomazov he puts forward some of the best and most compelling Christian literary thought I’ve ever read!

Matt
 
40.png
mattkennel:
Of course, sin begets a darkening of conscience. Nonetheless, the basic moral law (especially the Golden Rule, which you are correct in respecting). I’d urge you to read C.S. Lewis’ The Abolition of Man. Among other things, it has an excellent appendix that demonstrates how many moral principles go accross different cultures.
Of course? If I understand you correctly, you are saying that because of the effect of Original Sin and sin in general, men’s consciences have been darkened, leading to different moralities?

I can’t stomach C. S. Lewis that much, but I’ll check out the book.
40.png
mattkennel:
I wouldn’t call that a leap of faith or logic.
OK.
40.png
mattkennel:
However, I’d at least say that morals must come from some place other than the human mind. If they simply originate in the mind, then they are preferences and not laws with the power to bind. This has been realized by atheists in the past.

As an example of this consider the theory advocated by Raskolnikov in the novel Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky. He says that certain men have the right and duty to go beyond morals because they are supermen. Such a theory, in my opinion, is inevitably where atheistic ethics leads.
Therefore, I’d say that truly binding morals must be true in and of themselves, and not simply come from the human mind. But, if they are true in and of themselves then there must be some reason why they are true. The best explanation I can find for this is God.
I think that I agree with you that morals come from some other place than the human mind. Animals have a sense of fairness and feel wronged or guilty when this expectation of fairness is not lived up to. If there are other creatures on other planets, the golden rule and ideas of fairness, I believe, probably play a good part in their thinking, even though they may have differening ideas as to what is good and fair. However, these concepts could simply have a naturalistic, evolutionary reason for their existence.

For more about that, I would recommend Richard Carrier’s new book: Sense and Goodness withoug God.

Also, I would recommend this article regarding the basis of morality for atheists from ebonmusings.org: ebonmusings.org/atheism/carrot&stick.html#part3

clarkal
 
In the end and consummation of the Universe all are to be restored into their original harmonious state, and we all shall be made one body and be united once more into a perfect man, and the prayer of our Savior shall be fulfilled that all may be one.

– St. Jerome, 331-420
 
I’ve just finished reading most of the comments that reply to this topic. It’s interesting to see how most of your guys’ thoughts, fears, struggles, etc. are pretty much exactly how I feel, think, etc. :o My question is, are we losing hope (and I can say that to myself too!)? No doubt that we tend to be more worried about going to Hell than Heaven…yes, in the past, I was sooo discouraged and beaten up by my sins, that I TOTALLY lost ALL hope and was to the point of despair! Believe me, DON’T GET THERE!!! :eek: But there was a time when I was in total despair and yet prayed to God to give me hope! I guess you can look at that like I had hope deep down inside when I was in despair thinking I had no hope! So yes, please, pray for hope! 👍

I also understand that it does seem impossible to live a “holy” life (well, as holy as a human being can live on earth!) when we are terrible sinners (me, oh my, I was soooo bad, I was almost to the point of killing myself! But knew that was NOT going to make things better!) but with the Grace of God, we can do it! It takes lots of hope and faith (and yes, again, I can speak for myself more than anyone else in the world!).

I WANT to give my whole life to Christ but somehow, don’t know quite how. Does anyone else have a clue what I’m talking about? I think, Christ gave up His life for us, now I want to give my life to Him! But don’t know how to do it! How?
 
Paris Blues:
I’ve just finished reading most of the comments that reply to this topic. It’s interesting to see how most of your guys’ thoughts, fears, struggles, etc. are pretty much exactly how I feel, think, etc. :o My question is, are we losing hope (and I can say that to myself too!)?..

I WANT to give my whole life to Christ but somehow, don’t know quite how. Does anyone else have a clue what I’m talking about? I think, Christ gave up His life for us, now I want to give my life to Him! But don’t know how to do it! How?
Sometimes, I feel a lot of folks are too busy with the secular material world to pay much attention to God. That’s unfortunate. Personally, I try to be more aware of God and keep prayer in my life. I don’t think there is lack of hope in the world, but I do think there is a lot of apathy and indifference there.

First off pray for God to reveal to you what vocation you should or will have in life. There are many ways to serve God, religious life, married life, and even combinations of the two (married deacons etc). Ask your pastor if he can point you towards getting information about the religious life. You may want to spend a retreat at a monastary or seminary.

If the religious life in not for you, you can start off small like helping out at your parish… become a Eucharistic minister, lector, or usher.

You may want to join a organization (I highly recommend the KofC or the ST. Vincent de Paul society), help out at soup kitchens.

Personally I knew the married life was for me. I love kids, and my family is my support system. But I am very active in the parish and in the community. I feel that God has given me so much, I owe Him at least some service among His Church and his poor.

Being an usher at Church and working with the KofC fills that void for me. When I retire I may do some additional service, but for now it keeps me busy, sometime too busy.

Being married and having kids is a great vocation too.

Christ’s Peace
 
Hermione said:
olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml is a sermon by a saint, and here are some quotes:

…according to Baronius it was a common opinion among the Greek Fathers that this truth was expressly revealed to Saint Simeon Stylites and that after this revelation, it was to secure his salvation that he decided to live standing on top of a pillar for forty years…

I thought that I was reasonably familiar with the life of Saint Simeon the Stylite and I have never read that given as his reason for his extreme life of asceticism. If I recall, it is said that he was moved to it after hearing in church: “Blessed are those that mourn, for they shall be comforted.”

Could you have a look and see which Greek Fathers Baronius bases his statement on? I must admit I am dubious about it.
 
Well, I think this debate becomes a little more complicated if considering the idea of INVINCIBLE INGORANCE. It seems like most people fall in to this category. Perhaps someone can share some insight on what it is to be Invincibly Ignorant?? As to me, it would seem to describe the great lot of folks.
 
40.png
Hermione:
As I understand it, most people are going to Hell. Jesus Himself says so in the Bible when he says that the road to hell is wide, and the gate to Heaven is narrow and few enter it or something like that.

Furthermore, the Catechism says that no one is deemed ignorant of the moral law written in our conscience (or something similar), so people who deliberately and with full knowledge commit adultery, murder, theft etc. are in mortal sin even if they never heard of Catholicism. Right?

olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml is a sermon by a saint, and here are some quotes:

So is it true that most people are going to Hell?

Thanks! 🙂

Unless God is posting on this thread, there is no way of knowing 😃

Why should it matter ? 🙂

Incidentally, this site has a page which includes this:
The Novus Ordo Missae

Martin Luther said something to the effect that if you take away the Mass, you take away the Church. Do we not see the Church crumbling since the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae? We urge New Mass Catholics to read the articles below with good faith, assuring them that one can never be considered separated from the Church by attending the Latin Mass.

Bishop Lazo’s Letter (12.4K) ?

A Catholic Bishop, Bishop Salvador L. Lazo,

who has gone over to the SSPX​

wrote a letter to the Pope on Ascension Thursday of 1998. In the letter, the retired bishop gives his “Declaration of Faith”, explaining in detail his reasons for rejecting the Modernism entrenched in the Church, in all of its forms, including the New Mass, false ecumenism, and the reforms of Vatican II. For traditional Catholics, this letter represents a vindication of their adherence to Tradition and the Church before Vatican II, seemingly against the wishes of the Pope. For Catholics who attend the New Mass or who are not aware of the problems in the Church, this letter provides a source for serious contemplation and prayerful thought. For all, it is a “must read.” We present it to you all, not feeling at all to be overemphasizing its importance, in the hopes that you will read and distribute it, bearing much fruit.

  1. *]Warnings from Our Lord about the New Mass (7K) ? Relates the revelations given to the stigmatist Marie-Julie Jahenny of France regarding the New Mass. Marie-Julie’s revelations occurred before the advent of the New Mass. These revelations have not yet been approved by the Church, but it seems that this holy woman, if anyone, would be likely to receive such revelations.

    =====

    Not a good sign 😦 ##
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top