R
rk9414
Guest
Wasn’t this verse added later on? It isn’t found in any of the earliest manuscriptsBut our Saviour Jesus shown how wrong it was.
’Let the one among you who is guiltless be the first to throw a stone at her.'
Wasn’t this verse added later on? It isn’t found in any of the earliest manuscriptsBut our Saviour Jesus shown how wrong it was.
’Let the one among you who is guiltless be the first to throw a stone at her.'
sorry, what are you talking about?Wasn’t this verse added later on? It isn’t found in any of the earliest manuscripts
christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/aprilweb-only/117-31.0.htmlsorry, what are you talking about?
I don’t know what you religion is, but throughout my life, I never ever heard a wise statement such as John 8-7, so personally I will never doubt that a human being can come up with such a verse, then its surely from heaven.
Hadi - don’t got there.Jakasaki ,who issued stoning in the OT ?? what about the pre-NT victims of this law ??
Wasn’t this verse added later on? It isn’t found in any of the earliest manuscripts
Hadi.He was ok with it up until 30 AD …
Your kidding right, hello, is someone doing candid camera stunts on CAF now???
I quoted an evangelical site, are there any inaccuracies in that article?Your kidding right, hello, is someone doing candid camera stunts on CAF now???
Now, how should i, or even be bother to show you what is wrong with that story…
So… tell us the story… how does it really go…I quoted an evangelical site, are there any inaccuracies in that article?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pericope_Adulter%C3%A6
Although in line with many stories in the Gospels and probably primitive (Didascalia Apostolorum refers to it, possibly Papias also), most scholars agree that it was not of the original text of John’s Gospel.[2]
The pericope is not found in its canonical place in any of the earliest surviving Greek Gospel manuscripts; neither in the two 3rd century papyrus witnesses to John - P66 and P75; nor in the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.
It was in other documents and the Church considers it valid. Why are Muslims so in love with the concept of stoning people? Where are compassion and mercy in Islam?I quoted an evangelical site, are there any inaccuracies in that article?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pericope_Adulter%C3%A6
Although in line with many stories in the Gospels and probably primitive (Didascalia Apostolorum refers to it, possibly Papias also), most scholars agree that it was not of the original text of John’s Gospel.[2]
The pericope is not found in its canonical place in any of the earliest surviving Greek Gospel manuscripts; neither in the two 3rd century papyrus witnesses to John - P66 and P75; nor in the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.
This is what I found in Vatican Archives regarding this…I quoted an evangelical site, are there any inaccuracies in that article?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pericope_Adulter%C3%A6
Although in line with many stories in the Gospels and probably primitive (Didascalia Apostolorum refers to it, possibly Papias also), most scholars agree that it was not of the original text of John’s Gospel.[2]
The pericope is not found in its canonical place in any of the earliest surviving Greek Gospel manuscripts; neither in the two 3rd century papyrus witnesses to John - P66 and P75; nor in the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.
⇒ 7:53-⇒ 8:11] The story of the woman caught in adultery is a later insertion here, missing from all early Greek manuscripts.
A Western text-type insertion, attested mainly in Old Latin translations, it is found in different places in different manuscripts:
here, or after ⇒ John 7:36
or at the end of this gospel,
or after ⇒ Luke 21:38,
or at the end of that gospel.
There are many non-Johannine features in the language, and there are also many doubtful readings within the passage.
The style and motifs are similar to those of Luke, and it fits better with the general situation at the end of Luke 21:but it was probably inserted here because of the allusion to ⇒ Jeremiah 17:13 (cf the note on John ⇒ John 8:6) and the statement, “I do not judge anyone,” in ⇒ John 8:15.
vatican.va/archiveThe Catholic Church accepts this passage as canonical scripture.
You’re deflecting. You know why we keep bringing it up? Because you nor any other Muslim denounces what your prophet did. That means you accept it and feel it is ok.** In the name of Allah , the Most Gracious , Ever Merciful **
http://theislampath.com/smf/Smileys/default/salam.gif
You people will never be tired to bring the same subject again & again & again ??![]()
We get that young marriage is not a “must” in Islam. However, YOUR OWN PROPHET was a pedophile, yet you keep trying to deflect by bringing up what happens in the west.Young marriage is not a must in Islam . Also , Now a days , young marriage is banned under men made laws. A western girl of 15/ 16 years old is considered as toooo young for marriage but it’s normal for everyone to accept that she gives birth to love child & now needs to go for a DNA test to find the daddy . No one will be shocked . But , u people just can’t accept a legal marriage . Strange.
Maybe YOU think this is normal and acceptable, but I certainly don’t and the Catholic Church certainly doesn’t. MW often confuses Catholicism and/or Christianity with “the West” and lumps everyone together. Please don’t do the same thing.muslim woman i think makes an excellent point here and one i have somehow never even considered. when we talk about a 14 year old getting married the idea is foreign and seems crazy to us. yet in the west we pretty much accept sex at that age or any High School age as a normal part of growing up. so in essence we say sex is fine for younger teens and we should give them means to have it safely, condoms, access to abortion hiv testing etc… but protect them from not being able to enter a marriage??? it’s a strange set of standards we have in the west.
I agree with Jay53. It’s not right nor is it acceptable. And I don’t even have children.ChristIsLord;5225213:
Maybe YOU think this is normal and acceptable, but I certainly don’t and the Catholic Church certainly doesn’t. MW often confuses Catholicism and/or Christianity with “the West” and lumps everyone together. Please don’t do the same thing.muslim woman i think makes an excellent point here and one i have somehow never even considered. when we talk about a 14 year old getting married the idea is foreign and seems crazy to us. yet in the west we pretty much accept sex at that age or any High School age as a normal part of growing up. so in essence we say sex is fine for younger teens and we should give them means to have it safely, condoms, access to abortion hiv testing etc… but protect them from not being able to enter a marriage??? it’s a strange set of standards we have in the west.![]()
the VAST majority of catholics in the west IMO fit the description i protrayed, we can agree to disagree but that’s my opinion adn i think it’s very obvious. it is perfectly normal in the west even amongst the majority of catholics to not blink twice if your high school son or daughter is engaging in sex. i don’t see how anyone can not acknowledge that.Maybe YOU think this is normal and acceptable, but I certainly don’t and the Catholic Church certainly doesn’t. MW often confuses Catholicism and/or Christianity with “the West” and lumps everyone together. Please don’t do the same thing.![]()
Since you are not a practising Catholic, you probably aren 't a member of your local parish or attend mass regularly. Therefore your opinion is based on anecdotal experience. I happen to be a regular mass-goer and active parishioner. I can tell you for a fact that practicing Catholics DO NOT approve of premarital sex. And yes, we do blink an eye at the thought of high school kids having sex. The curriculum of EVERY Catholic high school and parochial grade school includes courses in chastity, marriage, and the teachings of the Church. Anyone who has contact with children, such as Boy Scout leaders, must take a class in “Protect the Children” program.the VAST majority of catholics in the west IMO fit the description i protrayed, we can agree to disagree but that’s my opinion adn i think it’s very obvious. it is perfectly normal in the west even amongst the majority of catholics to not blink twice if your high school son or daughter is engaging in sex. i don’t see how anyone can not acknowledge that.
most muslims aren’t getting married at 14 either it’s a cultural thing yet you want to hold her faith accountible for something is an anomoly, yet you want to ignore something and not apply the same standard to something is the overwhelming majority in your own culture.