A Catholic priest should know that to be approachable to many people that there is a common acceptable guideline on appearance.It doesn’t mean there are none of them out there. And it doesn’t mean that just because there was once case of a priest with long hair who turned out to be a crook, it doesn’t mean every priest who has long hair is a crook.
I’m just troubled that you put out an example without much explanation, and the topic is about long hair and not criminal records, yet you manage to summarize the length of hair with bad behavior. I hope we give our priests a fair shake here, this is hasty generalization at its worst and its never a good thing with priests or any other person.
Will you please stick to the thread topic. Your comments are totally irrelevant to the the OP’s question.Sorry, I did a quick check back on those details. It wasn’t a bag of pot it was…
The very role of the priest is one of non-conformity. Practicing celibacy is not exactly a part of mainstream culture anywhere I know of. Besides, Jesus was a non conformist, too, and he probably had long hair. Heck, I bet he didn’t even wear socks!It’s a question of length (how long is too long) and a question of non-conformity. I’ve never seen a Catholic priest with long hair.
Are you sure he’s a priest, cuz he looks like one of the Doobie Brothers?Well, there is Fr Seán ÓLaoire…
I don’t know why or how long hair would repel anyone.A Catholic priest should know that to be approachable to many people that there is a common acceptable guideline on appearance.
Welcome to the new millennium. I was at an interview once where the hiring manager has several face piercings. I was in a small claims court once and the judge had some hair coloring (a pink streak).We are taught this in military service and men and women know this in business. You play a part - even when that part doesn’t necessary fit your personality.
Does this priest on the right look unapproachable to you?That is, these men are agreeable to conformity. They cut their hair, they shave, they wear the suit that the Catholic Church designed for him, etc.
I like the paint-by-number piece of vintage artwork behind him.Does this priest on the right look unapproachable to you?
Exactly - man or woman, long hair is fine as long as it is neat and clean. That is the standard in the vast majority of businesses.I don’t know why or how long hair would repel anyone.
Exactly. One job I had at a big law firm. I met the two principals of the firm at different times after I’d been hired - neither wearing ties, one wearing a polo and long shorts! Mind you, the latter was in a smart casual context rather than a business context, but that was carrying things quite far even for smart casual.Welcome to the new millennium. I was at an interview once where the hiring manager has several face piercings. I was in a small claims court once and the judge had some hair coloring (a pink streak).
The very role of the priest is one of non-conformity. Practicing celibacy is not exactly a part of mainstream culture anywhere I know of. Besides, Jesus was a non conformist, too, and he probably had long hair. Heck, I bet he didn’t even wear socks!
I didn’t know long hair is a vanity. I’m pretty sure monks in the middle of the desert with no access to haircutters aren’t vain people.I think there used to be rules for Latin Rite priests that they couldn’t have any “vanities,” that is, long hair, jewelry, glitzy watches, etc. I think part of the point was to enforce a more visible rank system between prelates and priests. Now, I don’t mean that prelates could wear long hair, though.
Even in some seminaries today, like FSSP and ICRSS seminaries, men are required to have a short haircut.
Exactly! At many points in history and in many places, it was considered vanity to have short hair. After all, who could afford a barber to cut one’s hair or razors to shave?I didn’t know long hair is a vanity. I’m pretty sure monks in the middle of the desert with no access to haircutters aren’t vain people.
That is right. That is why in the East monastics do not cut their hair. Because its vanity to do so, that is why they have the big beards. The long hair sometimes is not obvious but if you look closely you will see they have long hair, if they have any hair leftExactly! At many points in history and in many places, it was considered vanity to have short hair. After all, who could afford a barber to cut one’s hair or razors to shave?
My posts deal with the secular Western Church. I’m not stepping on anyone’s Eastern sensibilities.I didn’t know long hair is a vanity. I’m pretty sure monks in the middle of the desert with no access to haircutters aren’t vain people.
Is vanity different from the East and West?My posts deal with the secular Western Church. I’m not stepping on anyone’s Eastern sensibilities.
That’s as silly as asking, “Is culture different between the US and Japan?” Of course vanity is different between the East and West. Why are you trying to entrap me?Is vanity different from the East and West?