B
buffalo
Guest
Empirical - testable, reproducible, and predictable.Hi Buffalo,
Of course it is empirical. It is a falsifiable scientific theory.
best,
leela
Empirical - testable, reproducible, and predictable.Hi Buffalo,
Of course it is empirical. It is a falsifiable scientific theory.
best,
leela
trua,While you’re at it, do you mind posting the scriptures that promote slavery, head coverings for women, polygamy, interest free loans, and the idea that it’s okay to throw your daughters to an angry mob for appeasement, just to name a few. And since your above post is your out-of context approach to scripture, then you won’t mind listing the scriptures to support the stipulations I provided either.
But this is only the beginning. If you are willing to dig deeper, you’ll find that the scriptures you posted are not only out of context, but in many translations are completly out of touch with the actual language they supposedly represent.
Dig deeper still and you will find that the nature of the “anti-gay” lie as presented in the early Catholic wiritngs are embarassingly inconcistent with the present-day method used to maintain that same lie.
You have bit off more than may be willing to chew. But nevertheless I will call you out on it every step of the way.
Catholicism is a religion. And it would be against the Constitution of the United States of America to force it to do anything it thought was sinful.
And it is not being forced to do anything? It’s just not being permitted to discriminate. Could an adoption agency decide that blacks are unfit parents and refuse to let them adopt?
Jesus N Cherie;4311345:
Catholic Charities is not allowed to “act on your own conscience” in Massachussettes where it was shut down by the government for doing so. Catholic Charities was persecuted by the government which is supposed to protect its rights to be protected from government. Homosexuality does not have that same protection…as it is not a religious organization.
I think it probably depends on the state. Some have have instituted laws preventing discrimination based on race, age, gender, religion, and sexual preference. Which others of these would you like to be able to discriminate against? You don’t have to like or approve of gays any more that you have to like or approve of hispanics, old people, Mormons, or hippies. You just must tolerate them.
They should not be allowed to teach it in school. And they are doing so. You would do well to go back to school and retake a government or Civics course to learn the difference.
No need to be rude. Can’t a Catholic be as charitable in debate as an atheist?
best,
leela
Hi All,The topic being discussed is Sexual Perversion which God hates.
Answer my questions, and I’ll answer yours. There are many good reasons. But you first.Hi Buffalo,
What a relief! I’m glad that we agree that there is a BIG difference between consensual homosexual activity and non consensual sex such as rape, pedophilia, and bestiality.
Consent may not be justification, but in a pluralistic society, the issue isn’t justification to allow but justification to forbid?
Why forbid if no one is harmed?
Best,
Leela
Riiiiight. You need to start respecting people’s views here also, I’m seeing a lot of passive-aggressive behavior from you.Hi pnewton,
I agree that you should not be accused of hate opposing homosexuality. We can disagree without doubting one another’s motives? But don’t we need to tolerate one another to a degree? I’m not saying that you shouldn’t state your view, but don’t we need to respect people’s rigjht to have different views?
Best,
Leela
Nice strawman. We aren’t being forced to THINK something, we are being forced to publicly ACCEPT something. Why don’t you try reading the thread before posting.Hi pnewton,
You like to think that you are being forced to think it is acceptable? How could you be forced to think something?
best,
Leela
Not discriminate against them, but stop discriminating FOR them. Big difference. And as to your 2nd sentence, you are dead wrong. There is a huge problem speaking out for what you believe, if you think homosexuality is wrong. Open your eyes.Hi Jean N Cherie,
You seem to be asking for a right to not just call homosexuality sinful but to actually discriminate against homosexuals?
If by “act on your own conscience” you mean speaking out for what you believe, then there is no problem in this country.
best,
leela
It isn’t even past conjecture…Hi Buffalo,
Of course it is empirical. It is a falsifiable scientific theory.
best,
leela
Almost all of our laws are based on Judeo-Christian morality. Define “some good reason” to us.Hi All,
Thanks goodness that the Supreme Court has ruled on Sodomy laws and stated that you can’t make a law against something just because someone claims that “God hates it.” You have to actually have some good reason why something is wrong?
best,
leela
it is. look at e. coli with a reproduction time of less than 20 minutes an experiment cango through 1000s of generations in a short time.Empirical - testable, reproducible, and predictable.
Of course I’ve been reading the thread. Can’t we discuss in a civil manner??Nice strawman. We aren’t being forced to THINK something, we are being forced to publicly ACCEPT something. Why don’t you try reading the thread before posting.
The Supreme court has ruled, “the fact a State’s governing majority has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice.”Almost all of our laws are based on Judeo-Christian morality. Define “some good reason” to us.
I do not go around telling people that I am a woman - they can see it. I don’t think it is necessary to tell them that I am heterosexual because that is a natural consequence of my womanhood and not their business anyway.
And yet you felt it necessary to advertise you heterosexuality in your post. How is that different than a gay person saying they are gay?
We know all about adaptation.it is. look at e. coli with a reproduction time of less than 20 minutes an experiment cango through 1000s of generations in a short time.
a colony is grown from a single cell when proper isolation and sterile techniques are used.
it has been studied that if you do a dna profile on a colony then expose it to a new environmental stress that after time most will die, usually some will survive. given time those prppogate. tiny errors in replication give new genomes. eventually one is better suited to the lab conditions.
while this has never created a new species(which would be a better proof) it does show change over time when the results are sequenced and do not match.
since we have the sequence and know what each gene does(much easier due to lacking the whole intro exon thing) we can determine the changes made and know if they actually benifit.
testable, reproducible, and predictable
now for the topic of the thread itself. yes the militant homosexuals and their advocates are pushing their aganda on us. and it is probably going to get worse before it gets better.
Can let me know what questions you’d like me to answer?Answer my questions, and I’ll answer yours. There are many good reasons. But you first.
If you know about evolution, then why do you say that it is not empirical?We know all about adaptation.
Please predict for me what humans will look like in the future.If you know about evolution, then why do you say that it is not empirical?
Hi Buffalo,Please predict for me what humans will look like in the future.