Are We Facing a Genderless Future?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

buffalo

Guest
Are We Facing a Genderless Future?

This spring, an Australian named Norrie May-Welby made headlines around the world as the world’s first legally genderless person when the New South Wales Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages sent the Sydney resident a certificate containing neither M for male or F for female.

For a few days, it appeared that the 48-year-old activist and performer had won a long legal battle to be declared “sex not specified”—the only category that felt right to this immigrant from Scotland. May-Welby’s journey of gender identity can only be characterized as a long and winding road. Registered male at birth, May-Welby began taking female hormones at 23 and had sex-change surgery to become a woman, but now doesn’t take any hormones and identifies as genderless. The prized piece of paper May-Welby sought is called a Recognised Details Certificate, and it’s given to immigrants to Australia who want to record a sex change.

more…
 
So she was born male, decided she wanted to be female, had an operation, and then stopped taking that which supposedly made her female? In that case “she” is a “he” with the exception of the operation.

As for genderless futures, no I don’t think that’s going to happen ever. Yeah there are some people out there who’d like to see it happen, but the other 7 billion want to keep it the way it is.
 
Alexander_Smith said:
So she was born male, decided she wanted to be female, had an operation, and then stopped taking that which supposedly made her female? In that case “she” is a “he” with the exception of the operation.

As for genderless futures, no I don’t think that’s going to happen ever. Yeah there are some people out there who’d like to see it happen, but the other 7 billion want to keep it the way it is.
Click to expand...
God made him as a male, therefor he is a male
 
That’s just sad. Where is the joy and satisfaction in being… completely neutral? “Yay, I have the right to be, uh, nothing.”
 
Coming from a New Age/Pagan background, there is a lot on emphasis in some of its circles paid there to Humanity eventually becoming Androgynous or at least Genderless hundreds of years from now, after we “evolve” physically and spiritually, so i am not unfamiliar with this line of thought.

Will it happen?

Almost certainly not, but a lot of folks in the New Age/Pagan world that are working and hoping for it to happen someday. 😦
 
Alexander_Smith said:
So she was born male, decided she wanted to be female, had an operation, and then stopped taking that which supposedly made her female? In that case “she” is a “he” with the exception of the operation.

As for genderless futures, no I don’t think that’s going to happen ever. Yeah there are some people out there who’d like to see it happen, but the other 7 billion want to keep it the way it is.
Click to expand...
That is one seriously confused individual.😦

I agree we will never see a genderless society.
 
Sabda said:
That is one seriously confused individual.😦

I agree we will never see a genderless society.
Click to expand...
I agree we will never see one Sabda.

But I wonder how many of our ancestors thought the same way about homosexuals.
 
In many ways we already do. Our culture at large has pretty much rejected the idea that there are any inherent differences between the sexes beyond those of “reproductive plumbing” (as it was put to me). Why do you think there is such outrage over the male only priesthood?
 
manualman said:
In many ways we already do. Our culture at large has pretty much rejected the idea that there are any inherent differences between the sexes beyond those of “reproductive plumbing” (as it was put to me). Why do you think there is such outrage over the male only priesthood?
Click to expand...
Didn’t Judge Vaughn Walker determine that gender was irrelevant in his ruling overturning California’s Prop 8?
 
Questions of this type have only one answer; if the people allow it, it will happen.
 
Bob_Aliano said:
Questions of this type have only one answer; if the people allow it, it will happen.
Click to expand...
I have my doubts. There will always be males who are happy to be males and females who are happy to be females. And both will be attracted to the opposites, and none to the asserted “genderless” who, I suppose, will be attracted to neither and will inevitably die out, leaving the world to those who have genders and don’t mind it a bit.
 
I have my doubts. There will always be males who are happy to be males and females who are happy to be females. And both will be attracted to the opposites, and none to the asserted “genderless” who, I suppose, will be attracted to neither and will inevitably die out, leaving the world to those who have genders and don’t mind it a bit.
Click to expand...
I hope you realize this arguement has been used when dealing with Homosexuals, that the fact that they have no method of reproduction somehow means eventually none will be left…

It doesn’t work that way, with our relativist views heterosexuals will turn a blind eye and the LGBT community will welcome the genderless into their group to increase the abominations viewable during their rallies and whatnot.

The future is not lost to a genderless society, but it will be completely accepting of this viewpoint and the “Live and let live” way of thinking will allow this to become another minority lifestyle that is ‘cool’ to support and is wrong to despise.
 
Ridgerunner said:
I have my doubts. There will always be males who are happy to be males and females who are happy to be females. And both will be attracted to the opposites, and none to the asserted “genderless” who, I suppose, will be attracted to neither and will inevitably die out, leaving the world to those who have genders and don’t mind it a bit.
Click to expand...
This isn’t a question about real gender, it’s a question about socially accepted gender. In other words; can social benefits, entitlements, be extended to those who currently are considered perversions of the natural order. There are serious religious, social and economic issues that go along with the elimination of gender as currently defined.
 
Isn’t it awkward talking to a stranger and not know if that person is a he or a she?
You can’t come out and ask, even though you can’t find a clue to the gender of the person so you try to carry on a normal conversational tone while you’re searching frantically for a clue. Then you don’t find a clue, the person doesn’t offer any clue in the conversation so you walk away still wondering and then tell everyone you know for a couple days about it.
Now we can add “I wonder if that person is gender neutral on purpose” instead of the masculinish but not really, sort of girl vs. femmyish but not really, sort of, guy puzzle. 😉
 
JDeJ said:
Isn’t it awkward talking to a stranger and not know if that person is a he or a she?
You can’t come out and ask, even though you can’t find a clue to the gender of the person so you try to carry on a normal conversational tone while you’re searching frantically for a clue. Then you don’t find a clue, the person doesn’t offer any clue in the conversation so you walk away still wondering and then tell everyone you know for a couple days about it.
Now we can add “I wonder if that person is gender neutral on purpose” instead of the masculinish but not really, sort of girl vs. femmyish but not really, sort of, guy puzzle. 😉
Click to expand...
There was a show on tv awhile back called Theres something about Miriam, and pictured a very attractive latina in a bikini with all these guys performing different feats to win her hand or whatever…

Turned out Miriam was a man, and the guy who won declined to go on the trip.

It still gives me the shivers.
 
Both science and the Bible say no, we are not facing a genderless future.

Genesis 1:27
God created man in His image; in the divine image He created him; male and female He created them.

No one will ever be born without a gender. People can argue it until they are blue in the face, but they have to face facts that while their certificates may say one thing, their DNA says another. You cannot change DNA. It is just that simple. DNA says either male or female. There is no “non-gender”, there is no third gender. That is just the way it goes.
 
Not disclosing your sexuality isn’t the same as being genderless; gender is more than a social construct. Personally, I think it is encouraging that gender can be ignored like this - maybe it would do the world some good to have the ability to not specify gender.
 
Bob_Aliano said:
This isn’t a question about real gender, it’s a question about socially accepted gender. In other words; can social benefits, entitlements, be extended to those who currently are considered perversions of the natural order. There are serious religious, social and economic issues that go along with the elimination of gender as currently defined.
Click to expand...
I understand your point. If it becomes a culturally accepted thing, it could go on and on due to new “converts” to the “genderless state”.
 
manualman said:
In many ways we already do. Our culture at large has pretty much rejected the idea that there are any inherent differences between the sexes beyond those of “reproductive plumbing” (as it was put to me). Why do you think there is such outrage over the male only priesthood?
Click to expand...
We need to spread the word that the unelected people who are holding the microphones, the media, do not get the right to create our culture. We The People create it and can change it. I’m sure people can be open minded enough to understand that.

Sadly, some shallow people are simply bored and feel insignificant in the history of the world. They want to make their mark on history by doing something different, so they artificially create something different, not for it actually being different, but for the sake of it being different in and of itself, which is actually quite an artificial behavior.

A genderless future will create more homosexuality, dropping birthrates, and save the planet from more polluting humans, just what the depopulation movement wants.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top