Army admits mistake blocking bishop HHS statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The bureaucrats are giving themselves whiplash from all of their flipping back and forth.

If Obama is re-elected, then they will flip back again.
 
Personally I think it turned out GREAT. All the negative attention our President can receive is welcome and well earned. 👍
 
GaryTaylor said:
Personally I think it turned out GREAT. All the negative attention our President can receive is welcome and well earned. 👍
Click to expand...
I am afraid though, that this might be a campaign strategy. If he works out a deal, people will jump right back on his bandwagon, forgetting all about it.

In his second term, well…I cannot even imagine the oppression that would take place. A second term for Obama would be devastating for religious freedom and freedom in general.
 
GaryTaylor said:
Personally I think it turned out GREAT. All the negative attention our President can receive is welcome and well earned. 👍
Click to expand...
If President Obama had nothing to do with it how can it be negative for him?
 
NewEnglandPries said:
If President Obama had nothing to do with it how can it be negative for him?
Click to expand...
Commander in Chief of of the armed forces.

The man Kathleen Sebelius answers to.

What part of any of this has Obama had nothing to do with?:rolleyes:
 
GaryTaylor said:
Personally I think it turned out GREAT. All the negative attention our President can receive is welcome and well earned. 👍
Click to expand...
I agree, Gary, but it also serves as a distraction from the more general issue of the fact that the so-called health care bill has no constitutional grounds at all.

I would also suggest that the administration’s real hope is that the Catholic Church, LCMS, and other Christian bodies will simply get out of the health care business altogether. That means more people become dependent of government operated health care plans.

Jon
 
SamH said:
Commander in Chief of of the armed forces.

The man Kathleen Sebelius answers to.

What part of any of this has Obama had nothing to do with?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
The issue of the Army editing the Archbishop’s letter is not something that ever crossed Obama’s desk. He has nothing to do with it.
 
Why on earth would any Army chaplain obey and unjust order to not read the Bishop’s statement? That they ostensibly obeyed that directive is worrisome.
 
Teelynn said:
I am afraid though, that this might be a campaign strategy. If he works out a deal, people will jump right back on his bandwagon, forgetting all about it.

In his second term, well…I cannot even imagine the oppression that would take place. A second term for Obama would be devastating for religious freedom and freedom in general.
Click to expand...
We shouldn’t be afraid that people will forget about this. If they forget, then its our jobs as Catholics to KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT, all the way to election day.

Any time politics comes up, let’s make sure we nail Obama to a cross (with his own actions of course…) This isn’t anything that he didn’t bring upon himself. He should reap what he sews. And, what he has sewn here, deserves every Catholic to denounce him.

Denounce him in February.
Denounce him in March.
Denounce him in April.
Denounce him EVERY MONTH, EVERY WEEK until election day.

Denounce him in EVERY POLITICAL CONVERSATION. If politics gets mentioned, then mention how Obama wanted to force the Catholic Church to sin by giving people contraception, and abortion pills. AND, Be sure not to forget, that IF ELECTED, he’ll unbury his hatchet and grind it something fierce to get revenge on the Catholic Church.

If we do that, as practicing Catholics, we won’t have to worry about people forgetting about this.

… I hope I didn’t use too much hyperbole there. I’m gonna make sure my actions match my words on this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top