U
ucfengr
Guest
This is going on my Christmas list…
Since it uses electromotive force and not gunpowder, technically it shouldn’t be called a “fire” arm.Is this invention a result of any of Trump’s deregulation?
No, my read is that it uses an electronic actuator instead of a firing pin.Since it uses electromotive force and not gunpowder, technically it shouldn’t be called a “fire” arm.
Well, you may be right then.No, my read is that it uses an electronic actuator instead of a firing pin.
But it still uses gun powder as propellant, in the ammunition blocks.
Yes, that tech is exciting. They are also testing a new rail gun but it’s a beast in size when you consider the required power plant for the energy and the capacitors to store the high charge. It’s only ship mounted at the moment, since they have the power to run it.But I know that the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford uses electromotive force rather than compressed steam for its aircraft-launching catapults. I figure it’s just a matter of time (though it may be a long time) for that technology to be scaled down for use in hand-held weapons.