R
rr1213
Guest
I don’t know what else to say about Jesus giving Mary to John. John was referred to repeatedly as the “disciple whom Jesus loved”. Scripture tells us that there was a special nature to their relationship, something significantly different from Jesus’ relationship with his other disciples who, most certainly, he also loved. That being the case, there is nothing strange about Jesus giving Mary to John to take care of once he was gone. No need to stretch this episode into more than it is. It is not a giving of Mary to the Church so that every Christian can consider Mary to be their mother as well. I also am not so sure how to say this without sounding uncharitable, but I think that the Catholic emphasis on Marian devotion leads to interpretations like this that are, well, unjustified.Oh but it is supportive. You just don’t want to see it that way. Jesus spoke many times like this and back then He didn’t have to clarify anything because the Apostles understood Jesus (they didn’t understand Him completely and not all of the time of course). We too should understand Jesus the way that He wants to be understood.
In the scripture passage Jesus did not mention John’s name before saying “behold your mother.” That right there meant that we are all his disciples and we should all behold our Mother. Are you not a disciple of Jesus?
It’s really strange how you (most protestants) want to take everything so literally in the bible and yet when it comes to John 6 with the “Bread of Life Discourse” (in some Protestant bibles that section could be titled “I am the Bread of Life”) you say, “no Jesus didn’t mean it the way that Catholics mean it.”
Well you are wrong when it comes to John 6 because that really is the real substantial presence of our Lord Jesus Christ and we are to eat and drink His Body & Blood. But we also have to remember that the substantial is always there with the spiritual as Jesus said “the flesh is of no avail, it is the spirit that gives life.” We believe it as the flesh alone without the spirit is dead. Just like the body is dead without the soul or just like faith without works is dead. He didn’t mean that the bread was only a symbol but you’ll get the spirit anyway if you only eat a symbol. He would’ve stopped the disciples that walked away (John 6:66) and told them, “no wait, I only meant it to be a symbol, you really don’t have to eat my body.” Instead, He let them walk away.
Of course I know that we all have Jesus spiritually. So if we know that we all have Jesus spiritually then there’s no need for us to actually eat His Body and drink His Blood now is there? And yet Jesus tells us to eat & drink His Body & Blood. And if we do this, He will raise us on the last day. Something to think about.
As for the Eucharist, I believe that we partake of the Real Presence with the body and blood of Christ. (And, yes, I don’t need to hear about how our Eucharistic celebration is “fake” because Protestants don’t have valid orders…I understand the Catholic position in that regard as well and consider it to be, also, unjustified).