Ask a Pagan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skadi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
On the side of the Gods against the Jotun, Loki, the fire demon Surt, and various other malicious entity’s. The Idea of a final clash of good and evil is a pretty common theme in religion.
Yes but I asked which side do you think you will be on? if you think you would be on the side of good, you must first identify what is good and than ask yourself why are the ones you worship unpleased with what is good?

Why would the ones you worship not care about love, mercy and forgiveness? why would they advocate hatred and violence? The world is the way it is because of people who refuse to love and forgive their neighbors.

Any being who is unpleased with love and mercy (forgiveness & compassion) does not belong to what is good.
Violence is a natural part of life, whether it is good or bad depends on the context of the action.
True.
Defending ones family or property from an attacker is a very honorable deed. Honor would be in keeping with the traditions of ones culture and religion. As such, a Hindu will have a different Idea of honor from an Arab or a Samurai or a Viking. Honor is subjective to ones culture but because I am a Germanic pagan i seek to emulate the Germanic ideas of honor. Courage is honorable, self-sufficiency, bravery, fortitude and determination are all honorable. To die on the battlefield is honorable. Every day i wish at least once for an opportunity for that to happen some day.
There is nothing honorable about tearing one another (our brothers and sisters) to pieces on a battlefield, why would you wish for that? I long for peace. Why would you long for violence?
Pope Francis -
"Today we have come to pray for our dead, for our wounded, for the victims of the madness that is war! It is the suicide of humanity, because it kills the heart, it kills precisely that which is the message of the Lord: it kills love! Because war comes from hatred, from envy, from desire for power, and – we’ve seen it many times - it comes from that hunger for more power.”
"idols, in idols of hatred, the idol that leads to killing one’s brother, which leads to killing love. It reminds me of the words of God our Father to Cain, who, out of envy, had killed his brother: ‘Cain, where is your brother?’ Today we can hear this voice: it is God our Father who weeps, crying for this madness of ours, who asks all of us, ‘Where is your brother?’ Who says to the powerful of the earth, ‘Where is your brother? What have you done!’”
Thank you for reading
Josh
 
Yes but I asked which side do you think you will be on? if you think you would be on the side of good, you must first identify what is good and than ask yourself why are the ones you worship unpleased with what is good?

Why would the ones you worship not care about love, mercy and forgiveness? why would they advocate hatred and violence? The world is the way it is because of people who refuse to love and forgive their neighbors.

Any being who is unpleased with love and mercy (forgiveness & compassion) does not belong to what is good.

True.

There is nothing honorable about tearing one another (our brothers and sisters) to pieces on a battlefield, why would you wish for that? I long for peace. Why would you long for violence?

Thank you for reading
Josh
Would fighting against ones who seek to cause great harm to others not be the side of good? Surt hates all life and wants to kill every other living being. Loki is a lying, backstabing trickster whom wants revenge for his punishment. To join Odins army at Ragnarok and fight such blatant malice, that could not be anything but honorable and good.

Things anyone can Identify as good, Loyalty, Courage, Hospitality, Fidelity, are all pleasing to the Gods.

While peace is good, and certainly preferable, it cannot last. There is and will alwase be conflict. Violence and conflict surrounds us, and is an inescapable part of nature. To die in battle with honor for ones family or friends, or for a dearly held cause, to make an ultimate sacrifice, that is good.

John 15:13: “Greater love hath no man than this, to lay down his life for a friend”
 
Would fighting against ones who seek to cause great harm to others not be the side of good? Surt hates all life and wants to kill every other living being. Loki is a lying, backstabing trickster whom wants revenge for his punishment. To join Odins army at Ragnarok and fight such blatant malice, that could not be anything but honorable and good.
How do you fight? ever heard the saying you don’t fight fire with fire?
Things anyone can Identify as good, Loyalty, Courage, Hospitality, Fidelity, are all pleasing to the Gods.
Okay, how about love and mercy (forgiveness & compassion)?
While peace is good, and certainly preferable, it cannot last. There is and will alwase be conflict. Violence and conflict surrounds us, and is an inescapable part of nature.
True, but do you long for peace or violence?

God blesses the peace makers, they will be called his children.
To die in battle with honor for ones family or friends, or for a dearly held cause, to make an ultimate sacrifice, that is good.
This is where you are mistaken. You say “to die in battle” yet you completely skip “to fight in battle.”
John 15:13: "Greater love hath no man than this, to lay down his life for a friend"
👍 Amen to that.

Is fighting and taking the lives of our borthers and sisters laying down your life for a friend? I don’t think so, because the other side think they are doing the same thing, so who pleased the ones you worship?

Jesus showed us how to lay down our life for a friend, in which there is no greater love.

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
For clarification, if the people I know that call themselves Wiccans exhibit better fruits more consistently than the people I know who call themselves Christians, then I should be judging Wicca superior to Christianity, right?
 
How do you fight? ever heard the saying you don’t fight fire with fire?

Okay, how about love and mercy (forgiveness & compassion)?

True, but do you long for peace or violence?

God blesses the peace makers, they will be called his children.

This is where you are mistaken. You say “to die in battle” yet you completely skip “to fight in battle.”

👍 Amen to that.

Is fighting and taking the lives of our borthers and sisters laying down your life for a friend? I don’t think so, because the other side think they are doing the same thing, so who pleased the ones you worship?

Jesus showed us how to lay down our life for a friend, in which there is no greater love.

Thank you for reading
Josh
I really don’t understand where you are coming from, Josh. You seem to advocate an extreme position of non-violence, which has never been a Christian perspective, has it?

Would you say that standing up against Lucifer is wrong? That to resist Satan is to fight against our brothers?

If indeed there are fallen angels that wish to do us harm, I have no problem taking a stand against Michael’s former “brothers” who wish us ill will. In fact, I would (and have) done warfare against them on behalf of my brothers in the Lord, when the enemy has tried to thwart the work of God.

I don’t know if your opinions are your own, or if they represent the general Catholic mindset. But many many wars have been fought by Christians over the ages, and you can’t possibly think all of them were unjustified, can you? That even when attacked, a Christian cannot do anything to physically defend himself?
 
For clarification, if the people I know that call themselves Wiccans exhibit better fruits more consistently than the people I know who call themselves Christians, then I should be judging Wicca superior to Christianity, right?
But what about the opposite experienced by your neighbor?

Does your life experience create reality, or does reality exist outside of you or what you think reality might be pending a kindness contest?
 
For clarification, if the people I know that call themselves Wiccans exhibit better fruits more consistently than the people I know who call themselves Christians, then I should be judging Wicca superior to Christianity, right?
Neo-Pagans have an advantage over Christians in that their brand of spirituality is new. Anyone who becomes one has to make a radical change in their life, usually due to deep convictions or an intense spiritual experience.

Christianity oth is still the default religion for most of the West. That means we get every idiot that happens to fall in our laps! People that are naturally traditional, or have no desire to let their religion interfere with their lives, or simply don’t want to put any work into it, all call themselves “Christian”.

Granted, there are pagans and Wiccans who “converted” because they love the shock value and/or wish to be “evil”. But they do generally grow out of it by the time they turn 20. lol.

Grading on the curve, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that Wiccans tend to be more spiritual than Christians. I agree!
 
If the gods so choose they may, as you say, infuse it with their presence. But the icon is not the god himself, more akin to a dwelling place. Not dissimilar to referring to a church as a house of deity, the church itself is not the deity but is holy because it’s a place kept sacrosanct and filled with the deity’s presence.

I consider myself a hard polytheist.
Ok thanks.

If you don’t mind me asking, how did you come to Hellenismos? Have you had experiences with the Greek gods that have pointed you towards their existence? As a hard polytheist, how do you view the deities of other faiths, as well as Christianity?
 
Is fighting and taking the lives of our borthers and sisters laying down your life for a friend? I don’t think so, because the other side think they are doing the same thing…"
I like very much what you wrote, but – from a Catholic perspective – you may be overplaying your hand here. I once exchanged emails with a friend, adopting your very position (almost verbatim, in fact), but was arguing on the side of pacifism. My friend, meanwhile, was arguing on the side of Catholicism, whereby one could be both a soldier and a good Christian.

My argument essentially was “when Jesus said ‘there is no greater love than this, to lay down your life for your friends’ it is not clear he intended it to encompass 'there is no greater love than this, to be willing to kill for your friends and to die defending them.” The killing aspect of the equation muddied the waters, I felt, but he felt that the a Christian sense of self-sacrifice could remain intact, even though – as you’ve pointed out – while your enemy was trying to kill you, you were trying to kill your enemy (and might just as well have succeeded).
 
My argument essentially was “when Jesus said ‘there is no greater love than this, to lay down your life for your friends’ it is not clear he intended it to encompass 'there is no greater love than this, to be willing to kill for your friends and to die defending them.” The killing aspect of the equation muddied the waters, I felt, but he felt that the a Christian sense of self-sacrifice could remain intact, even though – as you’ve pointed out – while your enemy was trying to kill you, you were trying to kill your enemy (and might just as well have succeeded).
This is a perfect example of why we do not interpret the words of Jesus outside of the Tradition which gave us his words.
 
Skadi;10831810]Thats reasonable. Thats is why I am suspicous of it, but most people tend to be suspicious of other religions miracles.
I am still waiting for you to list just 3 miracles from 3 different religions, (or more) so that I can study them?
all people seek first to understand something by their own worldview, and only if it is incompatible will they look for other explanations.
That’s not true. You cannot possibly think that hell is compatible with what I would prefer - right?
If Jesus appeared to me today and told me he wants me to believe in him, I would first try to rationalize it with my own world view, and if I could not I would seriously consider looking for one that fit my new understanding.
If Jesus really wanted to prove who he is, he could pull it off, but I see your point.
Likewise if today you encountered Odin in his form as a wanderer, Gandalf style clothing and all, and he said he wanted you in Valhalla, and you need only honor the gods, I think you to would try to rationalize it into your christian world view first.
Odin is a fictional character, in terms of historical veracity. Jesus was not. However, you are right to say that I cannot prove that Jesus is who Jesus says he is. All religion is faith-based. Or, do you believe that Odin actually existed and still exists today? I read one of your posts that seemed to suggest otherwise.
Alot of times pagan people talk about personal faith experiences a christian suggests they are demons in league with Satan, and that is one option for explaining this you could take.
I would not say that. I see no historical proof of Odin being real. I do see historical proof of Jesus the man who claimed to be the second person of the Trinity via his church.
Likewise for Jesus I could probably say that maybe it was a mirage or maybe some spirit playing games with me.
An unknown spirit masquerading as Jesus, but in fact is an unknown spirit, and therefore all of Christianity becomes a man-made lie. OK…🤷
The truth is none of us know how we would react in such a situation until it is presented to us. We tend to approach anything that dosnt ft with our world view with skepticism.
There were quite a few things within Christianity that did not agree with my world view; quite the contrary, but I became convinced that it was true nonetheless, that Jesus is who Jesus says he is. So I must disagree with that statement my friend. To each their own I suppose…
 
Learn about it, read it. if it makes sense to you, if you feal it and it calls to you, then go ahead. If not, well do as you will, we dont try and convert people, nor say those who arnt pagan will suffer.
Is this a historically accurate statement? I got it from here:

euroheritage.net/factsofmythology.shtml

"ODIN

The “Allfather” and leader of the Germanic Pantheon. He is the grandson of Ymir, the first humanoid created of ice, and son of Borr and the frost giantess Bestla. With his two brothers Vi and Vili, Odin killed his grandfather (Ymir) and created the Nine Worlds from his dismembered body, including Midgard, the world of men. For doing so, he is called the Allfather. He is also known for having seeded Yggdrasil, the World Tree that supports the worlds. In his quest for knowledge, he sacrificed his eye, throwing it into the Well of Mimir to acquire complete and universal knowledge. He also hung himself for nine days and nights from a tree, in some stories the World Tree itself, in order to advance his magical power and understanding of the world of the dead. He is also known for having created the first Germanic alphabet, Runic, whilst hanging from the tree as symbols imbued with magical power to be summoned by the divining user or godi (Odinic priest). He is the father of the foremost famous of the German and Scandinavian Pantheon, including Thor, Baldur, and in some sources Tyr. He rides a 6-legged horse, Schleipnir, and hurls a spear Gungnir, impervious to failure and unable to stray from its target. Two ravens, Huginn and Munin, observe the world and return to his throne in Valhalla to report on the moral and cosmic condition the Nine Worlds. He is revered as the god of poetry, war, the dead/afterlife, and corporal will. “Wednesday” is named after Odin by the synonym Weden/Wedne/Woden during the importation of Christianity into the Germanic British Isles. As foreseen in the “Voluspa” chapter of the Edda, Odin is to be killed at Ragnarök (the end of the world) by the Fenris Wolf, Fenrir…

…Direct worship of Odin and any physical reference to mythological tales associated with Odin do not appear until after the 3rd century CE, when it increasingly became a practice to lynch slain enemies from trees in his memory. Tacitus argued that the Germans principally worshipped “Mercury.” Since the Germans did not worship Roman gods nor adhere to Roman culture, this implies that Tacitus observed an analogue, a type of messenger god, as early as the second century BCE. This may refer to Odin as a medium between this world and the afterlife."
 
For clarification, if the people I know that call themselves Wiccans exhibit better fruits more consistently than the people I know who call themselves Christians, then I should be judging Wicca superior to Christianity, right?
You must ask yourself, what do you strive for in Christianity and what do you strive for in Wicca, in other words what is pleasing in Wicca and what is pleasing to God in Christianity and by their fruits you shall know them.
I really don’t understand where you are coming from, Josh. You seem to advocate an extreme position of non-violence, which has never been a Christian perspective, has it?
Not sure.
Would you say that standing up against Lucifer is wrong? That to resist Satan is to fight against our brothers?
When you say standing up against Lucifer, do you mean hacking our brothers and sisters to pieces on a battlefield? because I don’t think Lucifer would tremble too much at that, he thrives on hatred and violence.
If indeed there are fallen angels that wish to do us harm, I have no problem taking a stand against Michael’s former “brothers” who wish us ill will. In fact, I would (and have) done warfare against them on behalf of my brothers in the Lord, when the enemy has tried to thwart the work of God.
We cannot understand the mystery of the trinity until the afterlife, we are eternal beings in the afterlife, there is no threat of death, violence may be pointless in the afterlife. So when you say fight, we fight against Lucifer every day with our good works, with our love and mercy and evangelization.
I don’t know if your opinions are your own, or if they represent the general Catholic mindset. But many many wars have been fought by Christians over the ages, and you can’t possibly think all of them were unjustified, can you? That even when attacked, a Christian cannot do anything to physically defend himself?
It is hard for a lot of people to understand this, I like to think of it with Exodus.

The word of God is “Thou shalt not kill” period.

Remember when Moses killed the Egyptian in trying to save the Hebrew? Do you think God was pleased with him for that? God certainly wasn’t pleased with him, It was not “right” what Moses did, but he wasn’t condemned for it either.

God did not say “Thou shalt not kill … oh but it’s okay in some circumstances”

Sometimes we may have to take a life to save a life, but that doesn’t make it right nor justified. Anyone who feels justified or righteous in taking a life is gravely mistaken.

In some cases it may be understandable and forgivable to take a life (like when Moses did), however it is never righteous to take a life under any circumstance.
But what about the opposite experienced by your neighbor?

Does your life experience create reality, or does reality exist outside of you or what you think reality might be pending a kindness contest?
👍 Exactly.

The other side we fight against in war think they are doing the exact same thing, often in battle they say “why do you go out and fight” to which the reply is “because of my friend next to me” if both sides are fighting to protect their friend next to them, than who is righteous, who is justified?

Love and mercy (forgiveness & compassion) are of God. Hatred and violence will never be of God.
I like very much what you wrote, but – from a Catholic perspective – you may be overplaying your hand here. I once exchanged emails with a friend, adopting your very position (almost verbatim, in fact), but was arguing on the side of pacifism. My friend, meanwhile, was arguing on the side of Catholicism, whereby one could be both a soldier and a good Christian.

My argument essentially was “when Jesus said ‘there is no greater love than this, to lay down your life for your friends’ it is not clear he intended it to encompass 'there is no greater love than this, to be willing to kill for your friends and to die defending them.” The killing aspect of the equation muddied the waters, I felt, but he felt that the a Christian sense of self-sacrifice could remain intact, even though – as you’ve pointed out – while your enemy was trying to kill you, you were trying to kill your enemy (and might just as well have succeeded).
Thank you.

Like I mentioned above, I like to think of it in the story of Moses.

When Moses killed the Egyptian in trying to save the Hebrew, God certainly wasn’t pleased with him for that, It was not “right” what Moses did, he knew it wasn’t right and was sorry for what he did, but he wasn’t condemned for it either.

God did not say “Thou shalt not kill … oh but it’s okay in certain circumstances”

Sometimes we may have to take a life to save a life, but that doesn’t make it right nor justified. Anyone who feels justified or righteous in taking a life in any circumstance is gravely mistaken.

In some cases it may feel necessary and be understandable and forgivable to take a life (like when Moses did), however it is never righteous nor justified to take a life under any circumstance.

It takes great strength to follow Christ and lay down our life as he did and his disciples did, it’s only out of weakness that sometimes we take a life to save a life, I don’t know what I would do given such a situation because I have never been tested like that, but if I did take a life to save a life, Id know it not pleasing to God and never to be Justified nor righteous, but sometimes it may be necessary to take a life in order to save a life.

God Bless

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
Is this a historically accurate statement? I got it from here:

euroheritage.net/factsofmythology.shtml

"ODIN

The “Allfather” and leader of the Germanic Pantheon. He is the grandson of Ymir, the first humanoid created of ice, and son of Borr and the frost giantess Bestla. With his two brothers Vi and Vili, Odin killed his grandfather (Ymir) and created the Nine Worlds from his dismembered body, including Midgard, the world of men. For doing so, he is called the Allfather. He is also known for having seeded Yggdrasil, the World Tree that supports the worlds. In his quest for knowledge, he sacrificed his eye, throwing it into the Well of Mimir to acquire complete and universal knowledge. He also hung himself for nine days and nights from a tree, in some stories the World Tree itself, in order to advance his magical power and understanding of the world of the dead. He is also known for having created the first Germanic alphabet, Runic, whilst hanging from the tree as symbols imbued with magical power to be summoned by the divining user or godi (Odinic priest). He is the father of the foremost famous of the German and Scandinavian Pantheon, including Thor, Baldur, and in some sources Tyr. He rides a 6-legged horse, Schleipnir, and hurls a spear Gungnir, impervious to failure and unable to stray from its target. Two ravens, Huginn and Munin, observe the world and return to his throne in Valhalla to report on the moral and cosmic condition the Nine Worlds. He is revered as the god of poetry, war, the dead/afterlife, and corporal will. “Wednesday” is named after Odin by the synonym Weden/Wedne/Woden during the importation of Christianity into the Germanic British Isles. As foreseen in the “Voluspa” chapter of the Edda, Odin is to be killed at Ragnarök (the end of the world) by the Fenris Wolf, Fenrir…

…Direct worship of Odin and any physical reference to mythological tales associated with Odin do not appear until after the 3rd century CE, when it increasingly became a practice to lynch slain enemies from trees in his memory. Tacitus argued that the Germans principally worshipped “Mercury.” Since the Germans did not worship Roman gods nor adhere to Roman culture, this implies that Tacitus observed an analogue, a type of messenger god, as early as the second century BCE. This may refer to Odin as a medium between this world and the afterlife."
Tacitus equated foreign deitys to Roman ones so that his readers could have a certain amount of understanding. In addition, the oldest archeological evidence, that predating Tacitus’s writings, seems to suggest that Tyr may have been the primary god of Germanic paganism in the centurys leading up to their contact with Rome.
 
Tacitus equated foreign deitys to Roman ones so that his readers could have a certain amount of understanding. In addition, the oldest archeological evidence, that predating Tacitus’s writings, seems to suggest that Tyr may have been the primary god of Germanic paganism in the centurys leading up to their contact with Rome.
Don’t equate the 2.

Archeological evidence for Tyr’s existence = nonexistent.
Archeological evidence for worship of a mythical Tyr is perhaps what you mean?
 
I like very much what you wrote, but – from a Catholic perspective – you may be overplaying your hand here. I once exchanged emails with a friend, adopting your very position (almost verbatim, in fact), but was arguing on the side of pacifism. My friend, meanwhile, was arguing on the side of Catholicism, whereby one could be both a soldier and a good Christian.

My argument essentially was “when Jesus said ‘there is no greater love than this, to lay down your life for your friends’ it is not clear he intended it to encompass 'there is no greater love than this, to be willing to kill for your friends and to die defending them.” The killing aspect of the equation muddied the waters, I felt, but he felt that the a Christian sense of self-sacrifice could remain intact, even though – as you’ve pointed out – while your enemy was trying to kill you, you were trying to kill your enemy (and might just as well have succeeded).
In actual fact, just the other day I was watching an interview of prince Harry in Afghanistan and he said “take a life to save a life.” in which was wrong.

Many have that attitude, because sometimes it may be necessary to take a life in order to save a life, but that doesn’t make it right, it doesn’t mean we can just wash our hands of it.

I think it is the justification that is wrong with the saying “take a life to save a life.”

God Bless

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
I read something about the Hebrew in Thou shalt not kill being better translated as murder.

Speaking of, other than fear of direct vengeance, is there any ancient Germanic prohibition against murder?
 
Christians believe their god does not lie, but ours certainly can if they want to, just like any other being.
The Christian God isn’t like other beings. He is perfection in his existence and therefore not subject to human weaknesses. It sounds like to me, that many of the pagan gods are just humans with super powers.

that is not the concept of God that Christians have.
 
The Christian God isn’t like other beings. He is perfection in his existence and therefore not subject to human weaknesses. It sounds like to me, that many of the pagan gods are just humans with super powers.

that is not the concept of God that Christians have.
That’s what I was thinking…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top