D
dzheremi
Guest
Do you see how others might be uneasy with or see contradiction between the the two bolded statements above? I just can’t accept that this sort of contrarian philosophy is “not supposed to insult anyone” when the symbol of veneration in your religion is chosen, by your own admission, in order to be a thumb in the eye of the world’s dominant religion.LaVeyan does not, Theistic does. They’re separate religions. Satan is a symbol for individuality and rebellion, not evil or sin. We only use Satan because Christianity the current main religion, where as in Norse pagansim we would use Loki. It’s not supposed to insult or shock anyone. It’s just a sign of individuality from the mainstream.
If you want to reject Christianity, why not do so without building up all this ideology about individualism and being seperate from “the mainstream”? With all due respect to you, that strikes me as incredibly immature and superficial, if those are truly the underpinnings of your belief system. If, as you say, Christianity in and of itself does not bother you, why then would you align yourself against it in your spiritual life? If you want to be an “individual” against the “mainstream”, why do you choose to define yourself in relation to that mainstream?
It should also be noted that the vast majority of Christian-majority countries are only nominally Christian, so the “mainstream” is generally not religious one way or another. I would argue that there is true rebellion in being openly religious in western, post-Christian societies, particularly attempting to do so in an honest, respectful manner. I have, for instance, spoken to European friends who were shocked to find in me someone under 70 with a critical stance toward the world who did not share their secular humanist worldview (and before I get accused of tooting my own horn, I should emphasize this was their reaction upon hearing of my conversion to Catholicism! I don’t think I’m doing anything exceptional). A friend from England explained that most of the religious youth in his country are either Muslim or the children of high-ranking members of the Church of England. To find a “regular” religious person (read: someone who doesn’t fit their stereotype of “religious”) is apparently very difficult. Fair enough, I suppose; I prefer the narrow road anyway.