S
sedonaman
Guest
**
If he is a true Prophet of God Almighty ,then think , how will u face God on the final day for spreading such hatread about God’s messenger ?
**
We could say the same thing about any and all the false prophets that have arisen since Jesus. Are we to structure our lives such that, on the outside chance, one of them is a messenger from God? Perhaps all of them are God’s messengers. Most of them probably contradict each other. What then? Consider also if Jesus is the Son of God, and the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity who died for our sins; how you will face Him on the last day for denying his Divinity?
As I posted before, any person, man or woman, can stand up and claim to have a message from God. But the question is how are the rest of us to know whether or not that individual is actually God’s messenger of truth or if they are just pretending or delusional? What objective evidence or proofs are available to demonstrate that an individual is speaking as God’s appointed messenger? What proofs does that individual messenger point to as evidence to substantiate his claims?
In Mohammed’s case, he put himself in an inescapable dilemma: On the one hand, Mohammed performs no miracles. So, in order to demonstrate that he is not making up the Koran by himself, he must appeal to previous apostles and scriptures as confirmation of his validity. The frequency with which Mohammed does so itself demonstrates that it is absolutely necessary for him to do so and that he understands this necessity. But, on the other hand, if Mohammed affirms previous apostles and scriptures as being sent from God in order to support his own authenticity, then Mohammed becomes subject to comparison with their teachings. Since Mohammed himself necessarily affirms the divine origin of Judeo-Christian apostles and scriptures, we can thereby invalidate Mohammed’s teaching (and all of Islam) if Mohammed’s words in the Koran contradict the previous apostles and scriptures that he so frequently and necessarily affirms. Simply put, if Mohammed and the Koran are contradicted by the very proof that they appeal to, then we can and should conclude that Islam is incorrect. For if Islam was from God, it would contain no errors or contradictions.
While the Koran repeatedly affirms and relies upon the Judeo-Christian scriptures, it specifically denies the main premises of both Testaments.
With regard to Judaism and the Old Testament:
With regard to Christianity and the New Testament, particularly the Gospels:
- The Koran denies the unique position of the Jews as God’s Chosen People, uniquely chosen apart from all other nations and descending through Isaac alone.
- The Koran denies the necessity of keeping the Law of Moses.
Consequently, by denying Numbers 1 and two above, the Koran actually denies the Gospel message itself, which the Koran repeatedly affirms and relies upon as a predecessor.
- The Koran denies that Jesus is the Son of God and the Trinitarian view of God.
- The Koran denies that Jesus was crucified to atone for men’s sins and that he rose from the dead three days later. [Our friend planten even goes so far as to say Jesus fainted, regained consciousness, and then got up.]
Consequently, since Mohammed’s evidence for the Koran and Islam are based entirely upon appeals to these other scriptures combined with the assertion that the Koran is flawless, the entire supportive evidence for the Koran and Islam [and Mohammed’s prophethood] is wiped out as a result of these contradictions with Judeo-Christian scripture.
Source: biblestudying.net/islam1.html