Assassination of Terrorist Leaders

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the intent of the President was to humiliate him so that others would not imitate him. Likewise with Osama bin Laden: the man who presumed to declare war on the United States, thinking we did not have the stomach to fight, died cowering behind his concubine at the hands of Navy SEALs. What rejoicing there is in his death is limited to people rejoicing that they are free of their oppressor, but ridicule is entirely appropriate, to show these men for what they are: cowards, who can’t win against anyone who can fight back.
 
Two quick points from posters…“Thou shalt not kill”…the proper interpretation is “Thou shalt not murder”…big difference…if someone broke into your home and threatened you and your family with bodily harm you would be justified to “kill” him/her…murder is the unjustified killing of an innocent person…killing a terrorist who has “murdered” and continues to plan to murder innocent people is justified killing…not murder…from another poster…Adolph Hitler was Protestant…nope…he was Baptized and Confirmed Catholic…of course he didn’t practice his faith and a great many Catholics and Catholic priests were murdered under his evil regime.
 
That is technically Ceasar’s business. If it is a sin than it is Ceasar’s sin. But considering Mr. Bagdaddy was the leader of a pretty nasty terror cult, I’d say he got what he deserved. It’s a shame he couldn’t repent but he chose to not be taken alive, so it’s no fault but his. I’m sure the devil has a nice spot in hell for him.

Pray for the souls of his kids though.

And three cheers for the goodest boi in the Army!
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top