M
mangy_dog
Guest
That is precisely the point. The church (today)and the church fathers (then) are not in disagreement nor is there a “second truth”.I know what you are trying to say. But in this particular situation (Jesus’ ascension) we are putting the Church’s teachings into the scriptures instead of the other way around. Otherwise, arent we saying that we believe in something the apostles didnt?
Anyway, who says that God the Son had to ascend Himself into Heaven. This isnt an argument about Christ’s divinity. It doesnt matter if He had the power to ascend into Heaven Himself or not.
And yes, this does pertain to the claim by a couple of cults that Jesus is not Divine. They cite this very verse to claim that Jesus did not have the power to ascend into heaven but that the Father took Him into heaven. These are precisely the points.
By apostolic succession and Sacred Tradition we know that what the Apostles believed is exactly what is believed by the church today.
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum.