Atheism and the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter WildEyedAtheist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As i said, it has, you just wont listen.

And, ive got better things to do than go to a website that you think will eat me alive…
You mean you’re scared. Don’t have the guts. That’s okay, I understand.

Bye, bye now.
 
Okay. Here is your chance.

Ask a question, one at a time, and I will answer, one at a time (just like TR).

Be specific. Pick any topic.

Go.
I’ve asked you several questions you’ve not answered one at a time, or two at a time.

You’re just going through the same dull routine you went through earlier where you demand questions - and actually avoid answering the ones I’ve actually asked. 😃

Is it that difficult for you that I have to devote a whole post to a single question?

I’m still earger to discuss things with you despite these funny little ploys of yours…
Start off where I asked you for further information about your sourcing a slavery quote.

Or, I suppose you want me to re-post it!

You’re certainly out to prove how devoid your case is of substance. You’re almost as evasive as many Moslems here
 
oh you just love to bait dont you :rotfl:

well ill give you another gentle hint, it doesnt work on me 👍
I know. This guy’s amazing. I spend days trying to get a simple answer from him for one question - he avoided it by saying I’d not asked any. Then when he finally admitted it, he accused me of being too dim to have worked it out - obviously he can’t keep to one story there.

Now I’ve asked him several more.

What’s he do? Slip back into the “Have you asked me a question” routine - which in my four years of on-line debate is quite unique.

His refutation to well-thought out discussion/quotes is “Nothing’s been refuted” - a just-so statement.

More bluff and bluster.

He raised totally irrevant points about massacres done under the banner of “Church”.
 
I know. This guy’s amazing. I spend days trying to get a simple answer from him for one question - he avoided it by saying I’d not asked any. Then when he finally admitted it, he accused me of being too dim to have worked it out - obviously he can’t keep to one story there.

Now I’ve asked him several more.

What’s he do? Slip back into the “Have you asked me a question” routine - which in my four years of on-line debate is quite unique.

His refutation to well-thought out discussion/quotes is “Nothing’s been refuted” - a just-so statement.

More bluff and bluster.

He raised totally irrevant points about massacres done under the banner of “Church”.
He’ll resort to his sarcastic ways and dance around answers, its typical behaviour.
 
Question: Why did the Catholic Church not stop slavery in America?
 
He’ll resort to his sarcastic ways and dance around answers, its typical behaviour.
In post #81 he made the following quote…
40.png
WildEyedAtheist:
In short, most U.S. clergy lacked the respect that slaver Marshall professed to have for God. Rev. Fee saw that “ninety-nine hundredths of the Christian ministry in our land claim that it [slavery] is at least tolerated by the Bible” (Sinfulness of Slavery, 1851), p 3.
I replied (post #83)
40.png
Montalban:
By the way, who wrote this?

And is the book about Slavery being Sinful?
Now I admit, that’s TWO questions, not one, but I’m still waiting an response for what is (or rather should be ) a really easy question to answer

No response.

Post #95 he made this lamentable claim…
40.png
WildEyedAtheist:
Right.

And if you all had irrefutable PROOF that heaven and hell did not exist, you wouldn’t lose 3/4 of your membership overnight.

Right. That’s believable.
Proof? Post #102 I asked for this, no response.
 
Does the Catholic Church run America? no…
Don’t worry, I pointed out Christians who acted on conscience in order to stop slavery.

He replied with an obscure quote (that all I want is a little more information on - which isn’t yet forthcoming), so he moves on to asking more questions!
 
In other words, you can’t answer the question. Who’s dancing now?
That was an answer she gave. You’re asking an absurd question that a secular state would be influenced by the Catholic Church. It’s another of your false constructs that allows for safety - because it’s beyond reality (refer earlier to your ‘challenge’ for proof of God)
40.png
WildEyedAtheist:
Where is Montalban? At least he gives as good as he gets.
Ewww. To get praise from you 😃
 
In other words, you can’t answer the question. Who’s dancing now?

Where is Montalban? At least he gives as good as he gets.
Im not dancing sweetheart, im pointing out the facts of who actually runs America and whose responsibility it is.
 
What constitutional rights did the Catholic Church exercise in America?
The Catholic Church needed no Constitutional rights to control the Catholic population then anymore than it needs Constitutional Rights to control it now.

If the Pope made a papal bull, that would be that.

But the Church looked the other way, didn’t they? With the right hand, they condemned the IDEA of slavery, but did nothing to staunch slavery itself.

And not only in Catholic America. What of the Catholic Portuguese slavers, the Catholic Dutch slavers, the Catholic Spanish slavers, etc.

Where were the threats of excommunication?
 
Im not dancing sweetheart, im pointing out the facts of who actually runs America and whose responsibility it is.
Im a waste of space hey, glass house baby, glass house…
I’m still waiting for him to give me a really simple answer

Who said what he quoted?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top