Atheist Converts After Mock Prayer to Win $1m Lottery is Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter PennyinCanada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
While I see it as a good thing… it’s going to send other Atheists absolutely bananas. Why? The usual “Oh so God answers prayers for money but not starving kids in Africa!” etc etc.

Just clicked and I was right! lol. First comment:

“How nice. Across the globe, starving children with genuine, honest, desperate prayers, and God decides to use his power to ironically answer the mock prayers of some privileged, glutinous, supposed atheist–in order to win that atheists devotion.”
 
While I see it as a good thing… it’s going to send other Atheists absolutely bananas. Why? The usual “Oh so God answers prayers for money but not starving kids in Africa!” etc etc.

Just clicked and I was right! lol. First comment:

“How nice. Across the globe, starving children with genuine, honest, desperate prayers, and God decides to use his power to ironically answer the mock prayers of some privileged, glutinous, supposed atheist–in order to win that atheists devotion.”
Oh please. That’s their own problem. How many atheist charities are there :rolleyes:?

A lot of these atheists will always look for an excuse: “Why didn’t God do this”, or “Why didn’t God do that?”. For a group of people that claim to elevate rationality, they can be quite moronic at times.
 
Oh please. That’s their own problem. How many atheist charities are there :rolleyes:?

A lot of these atheists will always look for an excuse: “Why didn’t God do this”, or “Why didn’t God do that?”. For a group of people that claim to elevate rationality, they can be quite moronic at times.
I concur. I wonder what they would say if they were tape-recorded and made to listen to themselves a few years later.🤷 Probly just stay in denial and continue on in their irrational rationality:nerd:
 
While I see it as a good thing… it’s going to send other Atheists absolutely bananas. Why? The usual “Oh so God answers prayers for money but not starving kids in Africa!” etc etc.

Just clicked and I was right! lol. First comment:

“How nice. Across the globe, starving children with genuine, honest, desperate prayers, and God decides to use his power to ironically answer the mock prayers of some privileged, glutinous, supposed atheist–in order to win that atheists devotion.”
Im not an atheist and I feel the same way. Im deeply offended by this coincidence/prayer being answered.
 
Oh please. That’s their own problem. How many atheist charities are there :rolleyes:?

A lot of these atheists will always look for an excuse: “Why didn’t God do this”, or “Why didn’t God do that?”. For a group of people that claim to elevate rationality, they can be quite moronic at times.
Logical thinking please.

The relation to charities is what?

Do you know how many charities are secular? Gates ring bells for you?
So many more.

I am not an athiest, and I don’t have to look for an excuse.

You need to provide a reason. The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim.
 
Logical thinking please.

The relation to charities is what?

Do you know how many charities are secular? Gates ring bells for you?
So many more.

I am not an athiest, and I don’t have to look for an excuse.

You need to provide a reason. The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim.
The relation to charities is that atheists often love to exclaim about the problem of evil (as seen by the commentators in the article), but they rarely do anything to solve it. When a miracle occurs, they are the first to point at X amount of incidences that God has supposedly overlooked. I thought atheists were the ones to preach the washed-up adage of “Two working hands accomplishes much more than a 1000 clasped in prayer”; now all of a sudden they want to sit around and let God do everything? Talk about a rapid change in ideology.

Secular doesn’t necessarily mean atheist. Secular just means that it is institutionally “without religion”. The United States is considered to be a secular country, but that does not in and of itself remove the majority who follow some kind of religion. So we call the United States a “de facto Christian nation”, that is, it is implicitly a Christian country.

With the world’s largest religion being Christianity, I wouldn’t be too surprised if most people working for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were actually Christians. I once read that the Catholic Church was the largest charity in the world. But even if we assume that to be incorrect, let us ask ourselves from what paradigm and foundation did charity even first come about? Surely it couldn’t have been from Ayn Rand, or Richard Dawkins, now, could it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top