Attending Mass at your local parish

  • Thread starter Thread starter MelissaCaritas
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
One more question. Even if I’m being confirmed by the bishop of a different diocese?
In order to be** licit**, the bishop should at least have the ā€œreasonably presumed permissionā€ of the diocesan bishop of the place (c. 886). I think you can reasonably presume the the confirming bishop has this permission. Even if he didn’t, it’s valid.

Dan
 
In order to be** licit**, the bishop should at least have the ā€œreasonably presumed permissionā€ of the diocesan bishop of the place (c. 886). I think you can reasonably presume the the confirming bishop has this permission. Even if he didn’t, it’s valid.

Dan
Thanks.
Truelight, I’m confused, I thought you were already confirmed this past Easter? :confused:
Sorry, Sally. My life is always complicated. Nothing simple.😃

The date I joined this website is the date I began to learn the truth about Catholicism, By the first week of Lent, I knew that I wanted to convert. Praise be to God, but it was too late for me to join RCIA.

However later on in my journey, I was able to receive one-on-one instruction from an FSSP priest. I had been already validly baptized as a Baptist. When the priest felt I was ready, I was received in the Church in September 2011 through the traditional rite of reception.

My confirmation will be in a few months, God willing.
 
If the Church expects us to respect parish boundaries then the Church must respect our right to a Liturgically proper and spiritually fulfilling Mass. When a parish violates our right to a proper Liturgy it abrogates it’s right to demand us as parishioners simply because of where we had the fortune or misfortune to reside. Since when is residence a consideration to our quest for salvation? Are we to submit ourselves to slipshod, even abusive Liturgical practices just to satisfy some archaic rule? No thank you and if a parish I have supported for 25 years decides I’m not worth it’s time in the event of a necessary sacrament then I expect those priests can answer for it at the proper time.
I agree with Bob. I understand Father David’s concerns, but I suspect that enforcement of the canon law he recited varies from diocese to diocese. In my diocese, there is one area with a growing population of Catholics, and those pastors might need to be more mindful about who is served, but in most of the diocese, Mass attendance and parish memberships have been dropping drastically and pastors certainly won’t turn anyone away. There is no geographical map (with streets) on the diocesan website, other than a sketch of the vicariates. If this was an important issue the bishop wants Catholics to know about, then the information should be made available. It shouldn’t be incumbent upon an individual to research or beg for the information.

I live halfway between two parish churches and long ago one of the pastors didn’t even know what the boundary is (I never asked the other pastor). I chose a parish, got involved, but eventually decided to join a third parish for the sake of my spiritual health. I got tired of the liturgical abuses and hearing about how the Church should ordain women. I also wanted to share my talents and wasn’t allowed to because of the cliquish nature of the parish. My current parish relies on me in a number of ways. I have no doubt the last rites and a funeral Mass will be available at the parish I offer my services and financial support.

I also think it is unrealistic to expect someone to change parishes simply because they move; especially if it means leaving the parish in a lurch by quitting a ministry or parish outreach.
 
I currently attend an ethnic (Italian) parish that is not within the territorial parish where I live. I’ve attend there for years. My question is…how ā€œItalianā€ do I have to be to be considered a real member there? (I’m sure there were some Italians in my background, but they were pretty far back.)
 
The only exceptions to the above would be what the Church calls ā€œpersonal parishes.ā€ No, that doesn’t mean ā€œsomeone’s private propertyā€ despite the name:). What it means is that the parish is determined by ā€œpersonsā€ instead of territory. These are usually parishes established for a certain nationality, or parishes established for the Extraordinary Form (the ā€œLatin Massā€), or the Anglican use.
I grew up in San Jose before that diocese was raised, while it was still ā€œrawā€ Archdioces of San Francisco. Crossing a parish line for Mass was considered very serious; you better havea good reason (the only time we ever did was for evening Mass when we’d been camping).

In San Diego, there was a church up the street and around the corner, until I moved to El Cajon near the gal I was dating (now my wife), still easy.

Here in Las Vegas,the RC church is less than half a mile down the street, again easy.

But then I went to Ames, IA for grad school. One regular parish, and another primarily for the University, but also (I think) established as a parish. We went to the latter at first, until it sunk in that the othe had the school, and our kids were reaching that age. Now thT I ink of it, it seems to me that the university was either excluded or. Included in both; I forget. Still, our kids would be there, so we got involved there.

Then came DuBois, PA.

St. Catherine of Siena literally a block from St. Joseph; you could toss a rock or ball from one to the other (it was the short side of the block). about thre blocks away was St. Michael’s). No more RC churches in any direction for many miles (Nativity of the Mother of God was kind of tucked behind St. Michael’s; I found the East when I was wrong about Mass time at St. Michael’s one Sunday when the kids were sick).

Anyway all three RC churches were ethnic parishes (St. Catherine’s was Irish, the first. Built; St. Joseph’s Lithunian; and St. Michael’s Polish). St. Catherine’s had the school, and was closest to us ( by a couple hundred feet :)).

Now I’m back home, and in an EC parish. I pass my former RC parish, an RC mission (Vietnamese, and functionally a parish)’ andW sometimes another RC church on my way.

I’d love to know our parish bundries, if they’v even formally defined :).

The state of Nevada, perhaps?

Our Eparchy (diocese) is roughly the western half of the US (we have 3 bishops for the easteqrn half, or at least our supposed to; after a two year vacancy, or metropolitan see is being filled by the bishop of Passaic, which will leave it vacant . . .).

While there is another parish in our Eparchy 8 or 10 miles away, it is of a different rite and in our care. There’s a parish about 350 miles SE in San DWiego, one in Van Nuys about 250 or 300 miles roughly W, our cathedral in Phounex about 300 or so SE, anther past that in Tucson . . ., about 500 miles NW in Sacramento . . .

hawk
 
An interesting thread.

We live in Ireland where parishes and indeed dioceses are tiny.

…Recently when there was reason to contact the diocesan office, we were shocked to be asked if we are even Catholic as we do not attend the .parish church. Seemingly the local priest has made a complaint… We have met him only…once when he called as we were moving in. Overe 18 months ago…

As I explained to the secrtary, I have a major medical issue; allergies and a damaged immune sytsem, that makes attendance at a crowded Sunday Mass a danger…Also bad heatth. means that any attempted activity is totally unreliable…

As I said to the secretary, that is what our fine radio masses are for!As are live massed o

And if I am out midweek eg shopping or a medical appointment etc, I try to get to a quiet .midweek mass, when I stay. outside until time for communion.

Often that is in another diocese.

What made me very sad was that that had been said over a year ago and noone had even tried to find out why; simply accused…;

I do the very best I can in my .situation and spend many hours a day and more when sleep eludes me, at night…

Canon law?
 
I asked a similar question of a priest recently, and here is his reply back to me via a social media website:

Which parish should I register as a member at? The one of my childhood and where my parents still go (and sometimes I do)? The one closest to my work and easiest for me to attend on Saturday evenings where I have been going more to lately? The one closest to my home but furthest from work? I have to work on Sundays for my job so Sunday mornings I can’t go but Saturday evening is best for me…

*Good question. Not easy at all. Think of them as communities more than places and you might get to a little more clarity.

Which one do you most feel a part of the community of, and which one are you most likely to be able to contribute some of your limited time and treasure to? I think that might be the best question to ask yourself.

Anyway, maybe that’s a good direction to think in, because you’re certainly right that it’s a tough call as it is!

God bless you and thanks for writing! Sorry to take FOREVER to respond…
  • Father Shane
 
I asked a similar question of a priest recently, and here is his reply back to me via a social media website:

Which parish should I register as a member at? The one of my childhood and where my parents still go (and sometimes I do)? The one closest to my work and easiest for me to attend on Saturday evenings where I have been going more to lately? The one closest to my home but furthest from work? I have to work on Sundays for my job so Sunday mornings I can’t go but Saturday evening is best for me…

*Good question. Not easy at all. Think of them as communities more than places and you might get to a little more clarity.

Which one do you most feel a part of the community of, and which one are you most likely to be able to contribute some of your limited time and treasure to? I think that might be the best question to ask yourself.

Anyway, maybe that’s a good direction to think in, because you’re certainly right that it’s a tough call as it is!

God bless you and thanks for writing! Sorry to take FOREVER to respond…
  • Father Shane
Perfect example of what I was trying to say when my hand was slapped. When is the Canon going to be updated again?
 
In the case of the OP however, a young couple just beginning their family, it behooves them to attend their local parish because that is the community they live in. If their children attend the parish church, then their friends will also be neighbors. There are many advantages to having your circle of school, neighborhood, and church friends overlap - for children as well as adults.
The new territorial parish does not have a school. The current parish does. Either way, it might be irrelevant - we might homeschool. If we do, it would most likely be in cooperation with some friends of ours (two couples - the six of us are very close).

I imagine most of my neighbors aren’t Catholic. When we move, I don’t think that would change. My children are more likely to be friends with the Catholic families we know and associate with outside of Mass than with people we see for a few minutes each week.

The advances of the last century have made it possible for Catholics to live great distances apart and still attend the same parish, rather than needing to live within walking distance of their local parish (and therefore each other). The fact that people sometimes live a 45-minute drive from where they work, often have friends scattered across town, plus family in other towns and states…we’re no longer defining our communities by geography. God bless the internet, we don’t have to. Call it a good or a bad thing, but the people who happen to live on your street? You may or may not ever see them, speak to them, or have any part in their lives or you in theirs. (I should note here that it probably matters that my experiences have been drawn from two decades of living in Suburbia, both in TN and TX - other locations have a different culture with regard to neighborly interaction - I’m just speaking to my own experience, since it’s my own situation that I’m trying to make a decision about). The people with whom I have formed a community are the people with whom I share interests and beliefs - proximity of residence is hardly on the list of reasons why I’m friends with these people. I do not believe that I have an obligation to become friends with people simply because they live near me.
 
The new territorial parish does not have a school. The current parish does. Either way, it might be irrelevant - we might homeschool. If we do, it would most likely be in cooperation with some friends of ours (two couples - the six of us are very close).

I imagine most of my neighbors aren’t Catholic. When we move, I don’t think that would change. My children are more likely to be friends with the Catholic families we know and associate with outside of Mass than with people we see for a few minutes each week.

The advances of the last century have made it possible for Catholics to live great distances apart and still attend the same parish, rather than needing to live within walking distance of their local parish (and therefore each other). The fact that people sometimes live a 45-minute drive from where they work, often have friends scattered across town, plus family in other towns and states…we’re no longer defining our communities by geography. God bless the internet, we don’t have to. Call it a good or a bad thing, but the people who happen to live on your street? You may or may not ever see them, speak to them, or have any part in their lives or you in theirs. (I should note here that it probably matters that my experiences have been drawn from two decades of living in Suburbia, both in TN and TX - other locations have a different culture with regard to neighborly interaction - I’m just speaking to my own experience, since it’s my own situation that I’m trying to make a decision about). The people with whom I have formed a community are the people with whom I share interests and beliefs - proximity of residence is hardly on the list of reasons why I’m friends with these people. I do not believe that I have an obligation to become friends with people simply because they live near me.
Good post.

Even as a Protestant, I never attended the church in my neighborhood and my family built strong bonds that are in existence today. My church community had always been comprised of the folks at such and such church, not the folks on such and such street.
 
I asked a similar question of a priest recently, and here is his reply back to me via a social media website:

Which parish should I register as a member at? The one of my childhood and where my parents still go (and sometimes I do)? The one closest to my work and easiest for me to attend on Saturday evenings where I have been going more to lately? The one closest to my home but furthest from work? I have to work on Sundays for my job so Sunday mornings I can’t go but Saturday evening is best for me…

*Good question. Not easy at all. Think of them as communities more than places and you might get to a little more clarity.

Which one do you most feel a part of the community of, and which one are you most likely to be able to contribute some of your limited time and treasure to? I think that might be the best question to ask yourself.

Anyway, maybe that’s a good direction to think in, because you’re certainly right that it’s a tough call as it is!

God bless you and thanks for writing! Sorry to take FOREVER to respond…
  • Father Shane
Does an answer on a social media website take precedence over canon law? That’s not just a rhetorical question. I mean it. Are you under the impression that his answer takes precedence over the law?

This is a good example of why priests (exactly because we’re trained in this sort of thing, and exactly because people should be able to trust our answers) should be giving the answers found in canon law, and not personal opinion that contradicts canon law.
 
Does an answer on a social media website take precedence over canon law? That’s not just a rhetorical question. I mean it. Are you under the impression that his answer takes precedence over the law?

This is a good example of why priests (exactly because we’re trained in this sort of thing, and exactly because people should be able to trust our answers) should be giving the answers found in canon law, and not personal opinion that contradicts canon law.
She wasn’t asking which parish counted as her local parish according to Canon Law. She was asking where she should register (which you have said is basically meaningless).

By what you’ve pointed to in Canon Law, I would assume that the parish closest to her home is her proper local parish. I think a situation like this one points to the fact that the Law is not fully capable of addressing every individual’s situation, and it is therefore necessary to have provisions for exceptions, which the Law seems to have in abundance (because the Church is governed by Christ, Who is a pretty reasonable guy).
 
She wasn’t asking which parish counted as her local parish according to Canon Law. She was asking where she should register (which you have said is basically meaningless).

By what you’ve pointed to in Canon Law, I would assume that the parish closest to her home is her proper local parish. I think a situation like this one points to the fact that the Law is not fully capable of addressing every individual’s situation, and it is therefore necessary to have provisions for exceptions, which the Law seems to have in abundance (because the Church is governed by Christ, Who is a pretty reasonable guy).
The boundaries of a parish are drawn up by the diocese. The parish closest to your home is not always your ā€œterritorialā€ parish. When new parishes are founded, those boundaries might change due to increase or decrease of the population. Same if a parish is closed or consolidated.

Honestly, I have never met one Catholic who does not know in which parish they belong. It used to be, and in fact, still is around these parts that people introduce themselves by name and parish if in a group of Catholics.
 
Okay. My apologies.

I retract that statement and if I did, I certainly didn’t mean to come across as any sort of authority.

I offer this disclaimer: That is just my experience. Those who are concerned, ask your pastor or diocesan office.
My point there was not directed at you, but directed at the atmosphere I often see here on CAF.

What happens is that a handful of people post messages here saying things like ā€œjust consider yourself a member wherever you pleaseā€ or ā€œno one looks at that canon nowadaysā€ or ā€œmy diocese website doesn’t list parish boundariesā€ (as if that last one is some indication that canon law isn’t being followed in that diocese–go figure) or ā€œin my experience, this has never been an issue.ā€ Etc. etc.

Readers here (and many just read w/o posting) then come away with the false impression that this is the norm in the Catholic Church. Just because we see a certain pattern here on CAF does not mean that in the real world either canon law isn’t being followed nor that others should expect to have the same experience. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what’s being implied in these posts.

What people just will not accept is the fact that misinformation like this (disregard canon law) has the potential to cause people a lot of problems. When someone is told by the pastor/parish ā€œwe cannot accomodate you here because you aren’t a parishioner of this parish because you don’t live in the parish territoryā€¦ā€ Such a person will not be able to make an appeal to an internet forum. No priest is going to say ā€œwell, gee, if you read it on the internet, that changes things, I suppose I’m obligated to disregard the law and do as you ask because I wouldn’t dare contradict an internet forum.ā€ That sort of thing is just not going to happen. And where will these people who are suggesting to disregard the law be when such a problem arises? What is one supposed to do? Send a private message to a poster asking that poster to contact the local bishop and explain that because certain advice was given on a forum that the bishop should reverse his policy? Good luck with that.

People just don’t realize that there are consequences involved in telling strangers—whether it’s outright advice, or merely personal anecdotes which imply it—to disregard the canons about parish membership.
 
I grew up in San Jose before that diocese was raised, while it was still ā€œrawā€ Archdioces of San Francisco. Crossing a parish line for Mass was considered very serious; you better havea good reason (the only time we ever did was for evening Mass when we’d been camping).

In San Diego, there was a church up the street and around the corner, until I moved to El Cajon near the gal I was dating (now my wife), still easy.

Here in Las Vegas,the RC church is less than half a mile down the street, again easy.

But then I went to Ames, IA for grad school. One regular parish, and another primarily for the University, but also (I think) established as a parish. We went to the latter at first, until it sunk in that the othe had the school, and our kids were reaching that age. Now thT I ink of it, it seems to me that the university was either excluded or. Included in both; I forget. Still, our kids would be there, so we got involved there.

Then came DuBois, PA.

St. Catherine of Siena literally a block from St. Joseph; you could toss a rock or ball from one to the other (it was the short side of the block). about thre blocks away was St. Michael’s). No more RC churches in any direction for many miles (Nativity of the Mother of God was kind of tucked behind St. Michael’s; I found the East when I was wrong about Mass time at St. Michael’s one Sunday when the kids were sick).

Anyway all three RC churches were ethnic parishes (St. Catherine’s was Irish, the first. Built; St. Joseph’s Lithunian; and St. Michael’s Polish). St. Catherine’s had the school, and was closest to us ( by a couple hundred feet :)).

Now I’m back home, and in an EC parish. I pass my former RC parish, an RC mission (Vietnamese, and functionally a parish)’ andW sometimes another RC church on my way.

I’d love to know our parish bundries, if they’v even formally defined :).

The state of Nevada, perhaps?

Our Eparchy (diocese) is roughly the western half of the US (we have 3 bishops for the easteqrn half, or at least our supposed to; after a two year vacancy, or metropolitan see is being filled by the bishop of Passaic, which will leave it vacant . . .).

While there is another parish in our Eparchy 8 or 10 miles away, it is of a different rite and in our care. There’s a parish about 350 miles SE in San DWiego, one in Van Nuys about 250 or 300 miles roughly W, our cathedral in Phounex about 300 or so SE, anther past that in Tucson . . ., about 500 miles NW in Sacramento . . .

hawk
Well, allow me to post a question to you. You’ve shared in other threads that you’re a lawyer, so let me ask you for some hypothetical legal advice (just hypothetical, mind you!)

Let’s say that I’m a client.

Here’s my story.

I grew up in California. I’ve always liked California. I’ve always been a good citizen there. I’ve voted in every election since my 18th birthday.

A few years ago, I moved to Nevada, where I now live. I’ve always kept up my practice of voting in California. You see, I live near the state line and it’s just a few minutes drive for me to go back home and vote every November in my home precinct.

I went on an internet forum and asked around. At least a dozen people told me that they vote in a state other than where they live, and they tell me they’ve never (never ever) had any problems.

I do my grocery shopping in California every week. I go to movies in California all the time. Most of my family still lives there and I visit constantly. I’ve never, ever had anyone tell me I’m not welcome in California.

The last time I tried to vote in California, the poll worker asked me for an ID and I dutifully showed my Nevada drivers license. I was told that I cannot vote in California because I don’t live there. Can you imagine the nerve of that poll worker? I cannot believe it! How dare anyone tell me that just because of some archaic law and some imaginary line drawn on a map that just happens to put my house on the Nevada side of the state line that means I cannot continue to vote in the place where I consider my home? This is an outrage! A state isn’t some imaginary lines drawn on a map, a state is a community, and I should be able to be part of whatever community I prefer without having to worry about some arbitrary rules about ā€œresidenceā€ whatever that’s supposed to mean.

You’re my lawyer. Fix this. We’re going to court. Don’t worry because I have all the evidence we need. I printed out those internet posts telling me that I don’t have to worry about which side of the state line I live on, because it doesn’t matter. Oh, am I going to show those poll workers how wrong they are!

Now, in this purely hypothetical situation what would your hypothetical legal counsel be to such a person?

I’m not trying to say that you’re ā€œtaking sidesā€ here because of your post.

But I am curious what your reaction would hypothetically be???
 
The boundaries of a parish are drawn up by the diocese. The parish closest to your home is not always your ā€œterritorialā€ parish. When new parishes are founded, those boundaries might change due to increase or decrease of the population. Same if a parish is closed or consolidated.

**Honestly, I have never met one Catholic who does not know in which parish they belong. **It used to be, and in fact, still is around these parts that people introduce themselves by name and parish if in a group of Catholics.
You forget that just because they say they are from Parish X, they may be territorially members of Parish Z and not even be aware of it.

It’s the same with military personel who live off Base and register at the parish closest to their home. They will tell you they are members of St. Mary’s on Queen Street but the pastor responsible for them is actually Padre King at St. Michael’s at 13 Wing. They believe St. Mary’s is their parish and nobody has ever told them the difference. In a city with many parishes, some very close together it’s not always obvious that your house falls in Parish Y’s boundaries.

When I moved to a town I’d look for the closest church and always assumed that that was the parish I was supposed to go to. It’s only in recent years that’s I’ve discovered differently – and I’m 58 years old. It was much simpler when I lived in a village with one Catholic parish. You knew you belonged there.
 
You forget that just because they say they are from Parish X, they may be territorially members of Parish Z and not even be aware of it.

It’s the same with military personel who live off Base and register at the parish closest to their home. They will tell you they are members of St. Mary’s on Queen Street but the pastor responsible for them is actually Padre King at St. Michael’s at 13 Wing. They believe St. Mary’s is their parish and nobody has ever told them the difference. In a city with many parishes, some very close together it’s not always obvious that your house falls in Parish Y’s boundaries.

When I moved to a town I’d look for the closest church and always assumed that that was the parish I was supposed to go to. It’s only in recent years that’s I’ve discovered differently – and I’m 58 years old. It was much simpler when I lived in a village with one Catholic parish. You knew you belonged there.
Good point.
 
The new territorial parish does not have a school. The current parish does. Either way, it might be irrelevant - we might homeschool. If we do, it would most likely be in cooperation with some friends of ours (two couples - the six of us are very close).

I imagine most of my neighbors aren’t Catholic. When we move, I don’t think that would change. My children are more likely to be friends with the Catholic families we know and associate with outside of Mass than with people we see for a few minutes each week.

The advances of the last century have made it possible for Catholics to live great distances apart and still attend the same parish, rather than needing to live within walking distance of their local parish (and therefore each other). The fact that people sometimes live a 45-minute drive from where they work, often have friends scattered across town, plus family in other towns and states…we’re no longer defining our communities by geography. God bless the internet, we don’t have to. Call it a good or a bad thing, but the people who happen to live on your street? You may or may not ever see them, speak to them, or have any part in their lives or you in theirs. (I should note here that it probably matters that my experiences have been drawn from two decades of living in Suburbia, both in TN and TX - other locations have a different culture with regard to neighborly interaction - I’m just speaking to my own experience, since it’s my own situation that I’m trying to make a decision about). The people with whom I have formed a community are the people with whom I share interests and beliefs - proximity of residence is hardly on the list of reasons why I’m friends with these people. I do not believe that I have an obligation to become friends with people simply because they live near me.
Oh I understand. I live that life also. But, commuting 45 minutes for work and driving that far for a 5yo play date are two different things. šŸ™‚ Even with attending your local parish, I am sure that you won’t find all your friends on the same street. But you very likely will find that your children will make friends with neighborhood children and it will be much easier for them to be friends with kids who live nearby than with kids they need to commute to see.

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with where you attend Mass. I just encourage folks to build community where they are (partly by attending the local parish), then create a scattered web of community across 3 counties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top