M
MelissaCaritas
Guest
The 1917 Code of Canon Law required that the faithful attend Mass at their local parish. The 1983 Code seems to have dismissed that requirement: 1248 states that “A person who assists at a Mass celebrated anywhere in a Catholic rite either on the feast day itself or in the evening of the preceding day satisfies the obligation of participating in the Mass.” My reading of this is that no matter which parish you go to, as long as it’s a valid, licit Mass, you have fulfilled your obligation.
This does not fully address the situation in which I find myself, nor does it satisfactorily answer the objections a friend of mine raised to a choice that I have made, and I want to examine whether or not my choice is correct.
My husband and I married a little over a year ago. We were married in my home parish, which is on the campus of the University that he and I attended. We do not currently live anywhere near that church, so attending Mass there regularly would be decidedly less convenient. We began attending Mass at his home parish, which happened to be the closest one to our current residence. After over a year, we are expecting our first child (hurray!) and are moving to a house that will better accommodate our growing family.
The new house is a bit further from our parish, but not so far as to be an unreasonable distance. We would like to continue to attend Mass there, as we very much like the pastors (three EXCELLENT, good, and holy priests, assisted by two or three wonderful deacons), the liturgy is spot-on as far as adherence to the norms, and we have begun to put down roots. Specifically, my husband has gotten involved with the Knights of Columbus and I have begun assisting as a lector.
The parish that would be, territorially, our local parish when we move, is in no way objectionable. There are no issues of liturgical abuse, theologically unsound homilies, or anything of that nature (well, there was one year that they substituted one of the readings for something St. Francis wrote…it was his feast day, and the pastor there is a Franciscan, but the lector should have been instructed NOT to announce “The Word of the Lord” at the end!). Aside from that one instance (that has not, to my knowledge, been repeated), we have no objections to attending Mass at this parish. We just LIKE our current one.
My friend believes that we have a duty to attend Mass at the local parish - he cites obedience to and respect for the Bishop as primary reasons. The two parishes are in different dioceses - we live in a very large metropolitan area.
My question is this - to what extent do we have an obligation to support our soon-to-be local parish, and participate in the life of the community there? To what extent is that obligation waived, due to our participation in the community life at our current parish? Do we have an obligation to have our child baptized in the new local parish? Can we in good conscience continue to attend our current parish? Is my friend making too big a deal of this?
Perspective appreciated.
Debbie
Tiber Swim Team, Class of '04
This does not fully address the situation in which I find myself, nor does it satisfactorily answer the objections a friend of mine raised to a choice that I have made, and I want to examine whether or not my choice is correct.
My husband and I married a little over a year ago. We were married in my home parish, which is on the campus of the University that he and I attended. We do not currently live anywhere near that church, so attending Mass there regularly would be decidedly less convenient. We began attending Mass at his home parish, which happened to be the closest one to our current residence. After over a year, we are expecting our first child (hurray!) and are moving to a house that will better accommodate our growing family.
The new house is a bit further from our parish, but not so far as to be an unreasonable distance. We would like to continue to attend Mass there, as we very much like the pastors (three EXCELLENT, good, and holy priests, assisted by two or three wonderful deacons), the liturgy is spot-on as far as adherence to the norms, and we have begun to put down roots. Specifically, my husband has gotten involved with the Knights of Columbus and I have begun assisting as a lector.
The parish that would be, territorially, our local parish when we move, is in no way objectionable. There are no issues of liturgical abuse, theologically unsound homilies, or anything of that nature (well, there was one year that they substituted one of the readings for something St. Francis wrote…it was his feast day, and the pastor there is a Franciscan, but the lector should have been instructed NOT to announce “The Word of the Lord” at the end!). Aside from that one instance (that has not, to my knowledge, been repeated), we have no objections to attending Mass at this parish. We just LIKE our current one.
My friend believes that we have a duty to attend Mass at the local parish - he cites obedience to and respect for the Bishop as primary reasons. The two parishes are in different dioceses - we live in a very large metropolitan area.
My question is this - to what extent do we have an obligation to support our soon-to-be local parish, and participate in the life of the community there? To what extent is that obligation waived, due to our participation in the community life at our current parish? Do we have an obligation to have our child baptized in the new local parish? Can we in good conscience continue to attend our current parish? Is my friend making too big a deal of this?
Perspective appreciated.
Debbie
Tiber Swim Team, Class of '04