If anything could prove the true presence in the Eucharist, it is the utter emptiness of a church without it.“If anything could prove the existence of a soul, it is the utter emptiness of a corpse.”
-Mary Doris Russel
The “gospel of Psalms…” what the??? That even sounds cacophonous. I can see the “book of Psalms”, the “Psalter,” or even the “library of Psalms…” or “wisdom of the Psalms…” but the GOSPEL OF PSALMS? This is madness!turn to the gospel of Psalms
The only benefit I have ever derived from going to a non-catholic church is to experience the lack of His presence.
When you walk into other churches, people (generally) behave similarly to how they act when they go to a concert or presentation; they wander around, have loud, idle conversations, etc… There are some exceptions to this of course, but this has been my general experience.
When you walk into a Catholic church, people (generally) behave similarly to how they act when they go to a library or a cemetery; they instantly become quiet and still. There are some exceptions to this of course, but this has been my general experience.
To me, this a testament to the True Presence. Something in our very core instantly knows that we are in a sacred place; not a place where we just talk about Jesus, but a place where Jesus comes to us and waits patiently there for us.
I remember attended a wedding a few years ago at a local baptist Church and I was instantly struck with this feeling of emptiness; there were pews, there was a cross (with no corpus) there was a choir area… but there was no tabernacle. He was not “there” anymore than He is with me when I was in the parking lot or at the grocery store.
God is always with us… but when we are in the presence of the Eucharist, we are present at Calvary. God draws us up to Him.
Ultimately, I think this quote about the soul sums up my feelings about attending other churches:
While I want to respect your opinion I would for myself say this is malarkey. I have been in many many different churches both P and C and would disagree with your conclusions. It has more to how you have been conditioned by experiencing the presence of statues and other traditional Catholic settings. If you were blindfolded and taken into many Lutheran churches you would erroneously claim there was no Real Presence when the blindfold was taken off.“If anything could prove the existence of a soul, it is the utter emptiness of a corpse.”
-Mary Doris Russel
The only benefit I have ever derived from going to a non-catholic church is to experience the lack of His presence.
When you walk into other churches, people (generally) behave similarly to how they act when they go to a concert or presentation; they wander around, have loud, idle conversations, etc… There are some exceptions to this of course, but this has been my general experience.
When you walk into a Catholic church, people (generally) behave similarly to how they act when they go to a library or a cemetery; they instantly become quiet and still. There are some exceptions to this of course, but this has been my general experience.
To me, this a testament to the True Presence. Something in our very core instantly knows that we are in a sacred place; not a place where we just talk about Jesus, but a place where Jesus comes to us and waits patiently there for us.
I remember attended a wedding a few years ago at a local baptist Church and I was instantly struck with this feeling of emptiness; there were pews, there was a cross (with no corpus) there was a choir area… but there was no tabernacle. He was not “there” anymore than He is with me when I was in the parking lot or at the grocery store.
God is always with us… but when we are in the presence of the Eucharist, we are present at Calvary. God draws us up to Him.
Ultimately, I think this quote about the soul sums up my feelings about attending other churches:
I agree with this, which seems to be my experience too.“If anything could prove the existence of a soul, it is the utter emptiness of a corpse.”
-Mary Doris Russel
The mass is beyond description, one can just be in awe. When they say in awe, the mass would be one that describes this phenomenum on earth most appropriately. Thus it is not a time of coming to concert or listening and enjoying the band or the pastor preaching or performance or socialising.
People come into God’s presence, everything else just becomes pale in comparison.
As I stated in my post, my conclusions were based on my own personal observations of how people generally act in those settings based on my own general experience, though there are exceptions. YMMVWhile I want to respect your opinion I would for myself say this is malarkey. I have been in many many different churches both P and C and would disagree with your conclusions.
Statues have nothing to do with the real presence, and a lot of the Catholic churches in my diocese are not “traditional Catholic settings”. It is a mission diocese and several of the churches have little to no statues and are in buildings converted from buildings designed for other purposes, and some are merely trailers. My home parish has no statuary in the church other than the Crucifix and one statue of a resurrected Christ that is on the back wall and is only visible as you exit the church.It has more to how you have been conditioned by experiencing the presence of statues and other traditional Catholic settings.
Lutheran’s believe in a Real Presence, but they do not have valid ministerial priests or Holy Orders, so there is not actually Transubstantiation, nor is there a Real Presence in a Lutheran church. My claim of them lacking a Real presence would therefore not be erroneous.If you were blindfolded and taken into many Lutheran churches you would erroneously claim there was no Real Presence when the blindfold was taken off.
Well if the only benefit you have ever derived from going into a non-Catholic church is experiencing the lack of His presence you probably got what you were looking for.Wannano:![]()
As I stated in my post, my conclusions were based on my own personal observations of how people generally act in those settings based on my own general experience, though there are exceptions. YMMVWhile I want to respect your opinion I would for myself say this is malarkey. I have been in many many different churches both P and C and would disagree with your conclusions.
Statues have nothing to do with the real presence, and a lot of the Catholic churches in my diocese are not “traditional Catholic settings”. It is a mission diocese and several of the churches have little to no statues and are in buildings converted from buildings designed for other purposes, and some are merely trailers. My home parish has no statuary in the church other than the Crucifix and one statue of a resurrected Christ that is on the back wall and is only visible as you exit the church.It has more to how you have been conditioned by experiencing the presence of statues and other traditional Catholic settings.
Lutheran’s believe in a Real Presence, but they do not have valid ministerial priests or Holy Orders, so there is not actually Transubstantiation, nor is there a Real Presence in a Lutheran church. My claim of them lacking a Real presence would therefore not be erroneous.If you were blindfolded and taken into many Lutheran churches you would erroneously claim there was no Real Presence when the blindfold was taken off.
The majority of the non-Catholic churches in my area are non-denominational. Since “feel good” theology, once saved always saved, and prosperity gospel themes are not really my jam, I would say yes…The benefit of gaining a greater appreciation for His Real Presence in the Catholic Church through the lack of encountering it in these other churches who openly criticize and denounce the evil Catholic church and twist the gospel to mean what they want it to mean is exactly what I was looking for.Well if the only benefit you have ever derived from going into a non-Catholic church is experiencing the lack of His presence you probably got what you were looking for.