Well, it is sad that someone has led others and himself astray so much that the Holy Father had to resort to the most drastic canonical penalty possible in the hopes of bringing him back to the fold. It is the sadness, I suppose, that one sees when the patient is so sick the doctor must use heroic measures to stop him from dying. All the while, the patient not only denies he is mortally ill, he tries to stab the doctor trying to save his life.
Indeed. That is an upsetting concept regarding the Eucharist.
Best I can do. http://www.turboninjas.com/gallery/d/19411-1/balloon.gifHey I just hit 1,000 posts. I feel like balloons need to fall from the ceiling or something LOL
Not that this makes it any BETTER, but almost the entirety of that Mass was supposedly to have been done by women, so I’m assuming that it wasn’t consecrated into the actual flesh and blood of our Lord, thankfully. But the fact that he let that happen is insane (though so are his positions on female ordination and SS’M’ as a priest).
He excommunicated himself! God Bless, Memaw
The Los Angeles Times, for example, had bad things to say about the papacy of Blessed Pope John Paul II. Apparently, he did things they didn’t like. It’s like the media thinks they, not the Church, is in charge.
Why do you say that?
They can’t pin him down without outright lying or misdirection. He’s so alien to the whole bifurcated American concept of the politicial that it’s aggravating to American tastemakers, right and left.
Many of them excommunicate themselves. ( and maybe don’t have sense enough to know it!) God Bless, Memaw
I see. Thanks for the clarification.
Yes - he openly celebrated Mass in distinct defiance of any semblance of rubrics, he defied his ecclesiastical superiors who suspended him, and he openly committed sacrilege by giving the Body and Blood of Christ to a dog.
Yup!
