M
MrsAngelala
Guest
After yet another feast day spent listening to God’s plan for salvation through baptism – and I had to go to Mass twice today – I’m sinking fast.
I suffered a miscarriage three months ago. She was my first child. My path to being open to life was difficult, so you can’t even begin to imagine my horror when I learned through these forums and the Catholic Answers archives that my child, whom I bore not from any personal desire but only in obedience (I’ve never wanted children), is damned because God didn’t keep her alive long enough to be baptized. I have spent hours and hours screaming in agony over this.
Every once in a while I get stuck choking on the idea that God used my obedience to make me complicit in the damnation of my own daughter. Sometimes it leaves me doubled over in pain, unable to breathe. Sometimes, like today, I have to give up and go to bed because I just can’t do anything else. Later in the day it got a lot messier, when I unexpectedly burst into tears at the second Mass, tried to exit discreetly, tripped and fell with a BOOM… because that was necessary…
I’ve read the ITC document. I’ve had a lot of truly damaging experiences with Christ’s representatives in the Church. I found that the ITC’s direction to entrust my daughter to God’s love and mercy – blindly, and contrary to my lived experience – was not realistic or helpful. I’ve also seen CCC 1261, and frankly, I don’t understand why everybody points to it when 1257 is more relevant.
There is a lot I don’t understand about the inconsistencies between God’s revelation of himself through salvation history and these interpretations of doctrine which have so upset me. This is just what pertained to today’s feast:
I suffered a miscarriage three months ago. She was my first child. My path to being open to life was difficult, so you can’t even begin to imagine my horror when I learned through these forums and the Catholic Answers archives that my child, whom I bore not from any personal desire but only in obedience (I’ve never wanted children), is damned because God didn’t keep her alive long enough to be baptized. I have spent hours and hours screaming in agony over this.
Every once in a while I get stuck choking on the idea that God used my obedience to make me complicit in the damnation of my own daughter. Sometimes it leaves me doubled over in pain, unable to breathe. Sometimes, like today, I have to give up and go to bed because I just can’t do anything else. Later in the day it got a lot messier, when I unexpectedly burst into tears at the second Mass, tried to exit discreetly, tripped and fell with a BOOM… because that was necessary…
I’ve read the ITC document. I’ve had a lot of truly damaging experiences with Christ’s representatives in the Church. I found that the ITC’s direction to entrust my daughter to God’s love and mercy – blindly, and contrary to my lived experience – was not realistic or helpful. I’ve also seen CCC 1261, and frankly, I don’t understand why everybody points to it when 1257 is more relevant.
There is a lot I don’t understand about the inconsistencies between God’s revelation of himself through salvation history and these interpretations of doctrine which have so upset me. This is just what pertained to today’s feast:
- How is it that Jesus lived an entire human life, including a full nine-month sojourn in the womb, so that he could be like those he came to save in every way except sin – but then allowed his Church to exclude from his salvation those who die while still living in the womb, by denying them any path to baptism (water, desire, or blood)?
- If as the ITC document says, we are all mystically connected to Christ through his incarnation, and if he is most especially concerned with the least and the littlest (remember those “little children” he told us not to hinder were not baptized Christian children!), how is it that these unborn babies don’t have any claim on Jesus’ baptism?