Firing a **PREGNANT mother **depriving her and essentially her child of livelihood … so much for Catholic church blabber on protecting family, motherhood and children.
Disgusting…
Although, I shouldn’t be surprised…they’d rather throw children onto streets closing their adoption agencies just to avoid even a small chance of a child being adopted by gay people.
Freedom for you, but not for me, makes all of us less free.
In the end, if the teacher taught at a public school, then this wouldn’t be an issue. Life, sometimes, is unfair and nobody really wins in situations like this. Still, both parties each have rights that need to be respected.
The teacher chose to work at a Catholic school. She chose to be in a gay relationship and have an “un-natural” pregnancy. The school chose to enforce a morality clause that the teacher freely signed as a condition of employment.
Of course, there is always gray area and room for ‘compassion’, but the fact remains that she was in a position of authority over the girls and a lot of parents expect a Catholic school to adhere to Catholic moral standards (because they pay for Catholic schooling for specific reasons, including the morality.)
People who work at charters/religious schools know that they are at-will employees, and a lot of the time, it’s standard practice to sign morality clauses as a part the terms of employment. (More so for religious schools than just non-religious private/charter schools.)
So, it’s really not just “she was pregnant” and it’s just “evil” that she lost her job.
It’s she violated an employment contract and the employer decided not to employ her anymore. People, including pregnant women, get fired over that kind of thing all the time.
Like I said, there aren’t any winners here and each has the right to make choices that are best for them. Sometimes, that creates conflict. That’s life.