Bahá'í

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adamski
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why pray for me? Your God doesn’t really do or intefere with the world so to what end? I seriously ask that question.
Ignatian, a sincere question certainly deserves a sincere answer.

Baha’u’llah taught and Baha’is believe that God does answer prayers. And we believe in the intercession of others who pray for us, and we may pray for others. This includes those who have passed on to the next world (heaven). There are beautiful prayers revealed by Baha’u’llah for children to pray for their parents.

If this seems to differ from your understanding of how Baha’is believe in God, then I suggest you read the relevant Baha’i teachings in this light and reasses your understanding of our beliefs.

More than answering prayers, we believe that God’s hand is constantly at work throughout all of creation.

What may be confusing for some people is that we also believe that the processes of nature can be discovered by science (physics, biology, cosmology, geology, anthropology, etc.) by making scientific discoveries, we can learn how God has structured the physical world, and also scientific discoveries can have an impact on the interpretation of scripture. That is off the topic, but I can discuss it at length if you are interested.
 
Want to disprove Christianity, find the remains of Jesus.

Want to disprove Catholicism, find the body of his mother, Mary.

Elijah was taken up into heaven in a chariot…Jesus ascended into heaven. Why limit God?
This is an excellent question. Why limit God?

Baha’i do not wish to disprove Christianity. We believe in Christ. We really don’t have any dispute with Catholicism, I certainly don’t.

We do affirm, however, that God has spoken again, through Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.

To deny that it is possible for God to have done that is to place limits on God.
 
When would that be?

One has to keep in mind that the Church is the body of Christ, Colossians 1 below.

24 Now I rejoice in what I am suffering for you, and I fill up in my flesh what is still lacking in regard to Christ’s afflictions, for the sake of his body, which is the church.

And Christ said of his Church

16 “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”

So the Church is there to lead people in Truth to God on faith and morals.

We are all called to use our intellect, faith and reason to understand the revelation of God. God is truth and he calls us into a relationship with him, to know, follow and understand him. This is best done by being a member of the Church he established on earth and thereby receiving the sacraments that Christ established for our salvation.

God is God. Agree 👍 He does not change but he uses his Church on earth that he set up through Jesus Christ to lead people to truth and holiness so that we can share in his divine life forever. He told his first Catholic bishops to go out and preach the good news…we are called as Catholics to do the same today. Nothing has changed in this regards. It’s the Lord’s command.
Pork,

I will not go through the history of the Catholic church and point out the atrocities that were committed in its name. Surely, you have been taught about these times, some of them fairly recent. If somehow you were protected from learning about them, which I find hard to believe, then look it up on the Internet.

These times and events have discouraged many Catholics from remaining within that institution. I applaud, however, those Catholics that see beyond the evil deeds of the men, who carried great authority within the church, and so, at one time, the known world, and see to the heart of the church and its love of Christ and, therefore, remain within the institution.

You really don’t need to explain the role of the church to me. I come from a family with three ministers in its history, going back well over a hundred years; and, some of my ancestors, though they owned slaves, worshiped as Catholics.

That being said, translation of the original word, that we now interpret to mean a church as in institution, means something different. I do not accept that it refers to the Catholic church or any other institution. In case you are interested, here is one article that traces the true meaning back to the original Greek term. biblepages.net/gg06.htm That is as far as I am going to go with that.

I don’t understand why you feel you need to lecture me on the church and its role on Earth. It is great, wonderful, and inspiring that you love the church as much as you apparently do. I see things differently due to things that have happened in my life that are very personal to me. Because of them, however, I see beauty in all religions as they bring folks to their knees to bow and worship the mighty Creator.

Though I know Jesus to be the Son of God, all men that call upon others to develop further understanding of themselves as the spiritual beings that they are pull mankind up towards the Father and lead them to walk more closely as Jesus did whether they be of a faith other than Christianity or not. Good is good and should never be condemned.

Catholics will say these folks may walk as Jesus but will never see God because they do not believe in Jesus as His Son. I say, let God worry about that and we should keep our mouths shut regarding the judgment of God least we invite it to come down on us.

Please don’t quote me Scripture that you believe points to the Catholic church as the one authority. I have read that Scripture and do not interpret it the same way. Plain and simple, my religion is I love God. I love Jesus with all my heart and all my soul and he is plenty aware of it and my efforts to gain greater understanding so that I may more closely immolate him.

Christianity has used the Bible to interpret God’s guidance in establishing a church as an institution. The Baha’i faith has used the Bible, and the revelations of its leader, to interpret God’s guidance in establishing the church within the being of each individual man, to build upon and increase the active divinity within us through the Holy Spirit. In my system of belief, developed from my experience with the living Christ, this is what Jesus demonstrated to us. In addition to worshiping the Father, we are to Become one with the Father. (I know they don’t believe in an entity identified as the Holy Spirit. But, they do believe in the active god within all men. To me, it is the same thing, just called something different.)

Now, don’t try to twist my words and say I am saying we are all the same as Jesus. Nope, I surely, surely do not believe that. Heck, if I had that kind of faith in my being and of God’s love for me, my work here would be done. We are not the same as Jesus. But, we can all be Saints. I love you and all of God’s children enough to see that possibility within us.

Jesus said that it takes love to bring man to God. So, love all men, no matter what their belief system and through that love grant them the blessing of worshiping God, seeing God, as their hearts call them to do. If a correction needs to be made, God will direct them. Trust Him to be working in them. He is very capable.
 
"Want to disprove Christianity, find the remains of Jesus.

Want to disprove Catholicism, find the body of his mother, Mary."

Pork,

While I firmly believe in his resurrection, nothing can be proven by searching for the body of Jesus and his mother. Not only because of the religious doctrine and what it says regarding the two of them, but because they died two thousand years ago. Unless they were mummified, little would remain of them. It doesn’t help a discussion to propose evidence of something believed by proposing something that doesn’t make sense to ask someone to do. Faith is found in the miraculous. You take away from this by inviting someone to go look for the bodies of humans that lived two thousand years ago. Jewish burials did not involve preservation of the body in a manner that would prevent decay. You can’t prove they were not ordinary humans by using their missing bodies as evidence of anything. I get your point, but biology would have taken care of it by now. That there is no temple marking the place of their burial, also doesn’t mean anything. However, a few years ago someone found what was believed to have possibly been their family tomb. It can’t be proven that it wasn’t and it can’t be proven that it was. If you believe, you don’t need proof in the physical world.
 
"Want to disprove Christianity, find the remains of Jesus.

Want to disprove Catholicism, find the body of his mother, Mary."

Pork,

While I firmly believe in his resurrection, nothing can be proven by searching for the body of Jesus and his mother. Not only because of the religious doctrine and what it says regarding the two of them, but because they died two thousand years ago. Unless they were mummified, little would remain of them. It doesn’t help a discussion to propose evidence of something believed by proposing something that doesn’t make sense to ask someone to do. Faith is found in the miraculous. You take away from this by inviting someone to go look for the bodies of humans that lived two thousand years ago. Jewish burials did not involve preservation of the body in a manner that would prevent decay. You can’t prove they were not ordinary humans by using their missing bodies as evidence of anything. I get your point, but biology would have taken care of it by now. That there is no temple marking the place of their burial, also doesn’t mean anything. However, a few years ago someone found what was believed to have possibly been their family tomb. It can’t be proven that it wasn’t and it can’t be proven that it was. If you believe, you don’t need proof in the physical world.
Little Star -

I was making a point… 😛

that through history, no one has found or claimed to have the body of Jesus or Mary. This fact supports the Christian belief that Jesus was resurrected and the Catholic belief of Mary’s Assumption into Heaven. Both are in stark contrast to the burial remains of the apostles and saints through time.
 
Pork,

These times and events have discouraged many Catholics from remaining within that institution. I applaud, however, those Catholics that see beyond the evil deeds of the men, who carried great authority within the church, and so, at one time, the known world, and see to the heart of the church and its love of Christ and, therefore, remain within the institution.

You really don’t need to explain the role of the church to me. I come from a family with three ministers in its history, going back well over a hundred years; and, some of my ancestors, though they owned slaves, worshiped as Catholics.

I don’t understand why you feel you need to lecture me on the church and its role on Earth. It is great, wonderful, and inspiring that you love the church as much as you apparently do. I see things differently due to things that have happened in my life that are very personal to me. Because of them, however, I see beauty in all religions as they bring folks to their knees to bow and worship the mighty Creator.

Though I know Jesus to be the Son of God, all men that call upon others to develop further understanding of themselves as the spiritual beings that they are pull mankind up towards the Father and lead them to walk more closely as Jesus did whether they be of a faith other than Christianity or not. Good is good and should never be condemned.

Catholics will say these folks may walk as Jesus but will never see God because they do not believe in Jesus as His Son. I say, let God worry about that and we should keep our mouths shut regarding the judgment of God least we invite it to come down on us.

Please don’t quote me Scripture that you believe points to the Catholic church as the one authority. I have read that Scripture and do not interpret it the same way. Plain and simple, my religion is I love God. I love Jesus with all my heart and all my soul and he is plenty aware of it and my efforts to gain greater understanding so that I may more closely immolate him.

Christianity has used the Bible to interpret God’s guidance in establishing a church as an institution. The Baha’i faith has used the Bible, and the revelations of its leader, to interpret God’s guidance in establishing the church within the being of each individual man, to build upon and increase the active divinity within us through the Holy Spirit. In my system of belief, developed from my experience with the living Christ, this is what Jesus demonstrated to us. In addition to worshiping the Father, we are to Become one with the Father. (I know they don’t believe in an entity identified as the Holy Spirit. But, they do believe in the active god within all men. To me, it is the same thing, just called something different.)

Now, don’t try to twist my words and say I am saying we are all the same as Jesus. Nope, I surely, surely do not believe that. Heck, if I had that kind of faith in my being and of God’s love for me, my work here would be done. We are not the same as Jesus. But, we can all be Saints. I love you and all of God’s children enough to see that possibility within us.

Jesus said that it takes love to bring man to God. So, love all men, no matter what their belief system and through that love grant them the blessing of worshiping God, seeing God, as their hearts call them to do. If a correction needs to be made, God will direct them. Trust Him to be working in them. He is very capable.
Absolutely beautiful post again our angel of Light 🙂

Just to clarify, the Bahai Faith acknowledges the Holy Spirit and reveres its workings in the hearts and souls of men to create Gods Kingdom on Earth.

Bahaullah has stated categorically that “This the Day that shall not be followed by night”, the intensity of the workings of the Holy Spirit is at its greatest and a new civilization is upon us. The global community has advanced more than ever since the moment the Bab said “I am”, on which night the first telegram was sent by Samuel Morse containing the words “What hath God wrought”…since then, Abdu’l-Baha tells us that there have been more inventions in the past century and a half than the previous TEN centuries (true story, I went and checked)

The Holy Spirit is indeed inspiring the creative, intellectual, spiritual and material realms at the same intensity as it did when Jesus said “I am”

“This is the Day in which God’s most excellent favors have been poured out upon men, the Day in which His most mighty grace hath been infused into all created things. It is incumbent upon all the peoples of the world to reconcile their differences, and, with perfect unity and peace, abide beneath the shadow of the Tree of His care and loving-kindness. It behoveth them to cleave to whatsoever will, in this Day, be conducive to the exaltation of their stations, and to the promotion of their best interests. Happy are those whom the all-glorious Pen was moved to remember, and blessed are those men whose names, by virtue of Our inscrutable decree, We have preferred to conceal.”

There will be 6 billion Jesus’s in deed, not in station, and Baha’u’llah has provided the exact blueprint for its realization.

God bless you and your pure heart 🙂
 
This is an excellent question. Why limit God?

Baha’i do not wish to disprove Christianity. We believe in Christ. We really don’t have any dispute with Catholicism, I certainly don’t.

We do affirm, however, that God has spoken again, through Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.

To deny that it is possible for God to have done that is to place limits on God.
jCC –

But God is Truth and can not contradict himself. Jesus Christ can not be both the Son of God incarnate (Christianity) and just a prophet and/or man (non-Christians). So yes, I can deny that God has spoken through Muhammed, Bab and Baha’u’llah and that is not placing limitations on God.
 
A discussion on religion where folks of differing faiths are treated respectfully is one thing. What is going on in this thread is another. There is a difference. It is where this difference lies that true Christian behavior is found.
The focus of this thread has drifted away from where it should be. God wishes us to work together. To accept each others beliefs. To avoid judging others because their particular truth is different from our own. EVERY major religion all lead to the same truth - the one true God. He is LOVE, and any talk to alienating others over doctrine or human ruling is against God’s wish for us as humanity. UNITY is one of the main teachings of the Bahai’ faith. I do not keep prejudice against any other faith - Catholic, Islam or other. Those truths were sent by God for the people for that region and age, and WITHOUT QUESTION they brought God’s truth to those people as God intended.

Accept others and their truths! God would want you to show love and acceptance! He says as much in his OWN WORDS if you would take time to read and understand.

With love and respect, ChristianBahai
 
Little Star -

I was making a point… 😛

that through history, no one has found or claimed to have the body of Jesus or Mary. This fact supports the Christian belief that Jesus was resurrected and the Catholic belief of Mary’s Assumption into Heaven. Both are in stark contrast to the burial remains of the apostles and saints through time.
I understand your point. However, as I see it, none of what the physical world says regarding how they died where there bodies were, if they were found or not, nothing in the physical world means anything when one believes in Truth. I enjoy watching documentaries that show the piecing together of artifacts and reveal that the Bible does record historical fact. But, it doesn’t matter. We walk on a weak foundation when we try to prove anything of a Spiritual nature with physical artifacts. The truth is, someone said that the disciples were buried in those locations. No one knows or can know for sure. But, does it matter?
 
We walk on a weak foundation when we try to prove anything of a Spiritual nature with physical artifacts.
Little Star,

There is that little matter of the Bible, the Written Word Of God. A physical artifact that speaks to the Spiritual nature through God’s revelation.

But of course you know that the Church existed before the bible became into being, and that bible was written by, for and about the Catholic Church … it’s a Catholic book approved by Catholic Bishops…for instruction certainly but also to have a universal set of readings for Mass. Words from the Council of Carthage below.

“[It has been decided] that nothing except the Canonical Scriptures should be read in the church under the name of the Divine Scriptures. But the Canonical Scriptures are: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Josue, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings, Paralipomenon two books, Job, the Psalter of David, five books of Solomon, twelve books of the Prophets, Isaias, Jeremias, Daniel, Ezechiel, Tobias, Judith, Esther, two books of Esdras, two books of the Maccabees. Moreover, of the New Testament: Four books of the Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles one book, thirteen epistles of Paul the Apostle, one of the same to the Hebrews, two of Peter, three of John, one of James, one of Jude, the Apocalypse of John.” Council of Carthage III, Canon 47 (A.D. 397).

And from the Council of Toledo … we are to reject any Scripture and revelation not approved by the Catholic Church. This includes Baha’i.
“If any one shall say, or shall believe, that other Scriptures, besides those which the Catholic Church has received, are to be esteemed of authority, or to be venerated, let him be anathema.” Council of Toledo, Canon 12 (A.D. 400).

The canon of scripture was again determined by apostolic teaching handed down (Tradition), Catholic Church councils and Catholic Church Bishops.
“The authority of our books [Scriptures], which is confirmed by agreement of so many nations, supported by a succession of apostles, bishops, and councils, is against you.” Augustine, Reply to Faustus the Manichean, 13:5 (c. A.D. 400).

The bible is a physical artifact. Do you believe it stands on a weak foundation?
 
Little Star,

There is that little matter of the Bible, the Written Word Of God. A physical artifact that speaks to the Spiritual nature through God’s revelation.

But of course you know that the Church existed before the bible became into being, and that bible was written by, for and about the Catholic Church … it’s a Catholic book approved by Catholic Bishops…for instruction certainly but also to have a universal set of readings for Mass. Words from the Council of Carthage below.

“[It has been decided] that nothing except the Canonical Scriptures should be read in the church under the name of the Divine Scriptures. But the Canonical Scriptures are: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Josue, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings, Paralipomenon two books, Job, the Psalter of David, five books of Solomon, twelve books of the Prophets, Isaias, Jeremias, Daniel, Ezechiel, Tobias, Judith, Esther, two books of Esdras, two books of the Maccabees. Moreover, of the New Testament: Four books of the Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles one book, thirteen epistles of Paul the Apostle, one of the same to the Hebrews, two of Peter, three of John, one of James, one of Jude, the Apocalypse of John.” Council of Carthage III, Canon 47 (A.D. 397).

And from the Council of Toledo … we are to reject any Scripture and revelation not approved by the Catholic Church. This includes Baha’i.
“If any one shall say, or shall believe, that other Scriptures, besides those which the Catholic Church has received, are to be esteemed of authority, or to be venerated, let him be anathema.” Council of Toledo, Canon 12 (A.D. 400).

The canon of scripture was again determined by apostolic teaching handed down (Tradition), Catholic Church councils and Catholic Church Bishops.
“The authority of our books [Scriptures], which is confirmed by agreement of so many nations, supported by a succession of apostles, bishops, and councils, is against you.” Augustine, Reply to Faustus the Manichean, 13:5 (c. A.D. 400).

The bible is a physical artifact. Do you believe it stands on a weak foundation?
No, the Bible is the Word of God. Why do you keep trying to find a way to say that I do not believe in the Word of God? However, you cannot prove that the Catholic church is the one true church by quoting doctrine of the Catholic church. Well, you can do it, but it does not prove your point. I am not Catholic. So, whatever has been handed down by Catholic Councils means nothing to me. I love the Catholic church and respect its authority over those that call themselves Catholic. But, I am not one of those that do. Are you aware that at one time the church doctrine forbid laymen to read the Bible? This doctrine came out of a Catholic Council. A Pope said that Mary of Magdalene was a prostitute. This has since been recanted. The Councils are made up of men. They are not infallible. As they were the authority within the Catholic church, they placed errors within the church doctrine. They made rulings that placed a great deal of authority over the lives of common men to increase their own power.

THE COUNCIL OF TARRAGONA - 1234 A.D.

The Council of Tarragona of 1234, in its second canon, ruled that:

“No one may possess the books of the Old and New Testaments in the Romance language, and if anyone possesses them he must turn them over to the local bishop within eight days after promulgation of this decree, so that they may be burned lest, be he a cleric or a layman, he be suspected until he is cleared of all suspicion.”

-D. Lortsch, Historie de la Bible en France, 1910, p.14.

See also: The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia article on the Scripture.

I respect your beliefs but do not hold the Catholic church as a authority over me and my spirit. That lies within the hands of the Lord.

My faith does not require physical artifacts that tell me Jesus is real, God is real. I read the Bible to understand God’s relationship with man to better understand who I am to God.

You are Catholic. So, you think that your are required to reject all other revelations outside of those approved by the Catholic church. Fine, that is how you have chosen to direct your spiritual development. I have been directed in another way. You don’t have to accept that this is true. Truth is Truth. It stands no matter how man may perceive it.
You shall not convince me otherwise any more than what I say will convince you. I am not trying to convince you of anything other than I respect your chosen religion and that you have chosen it.

Please stop putting words in my mouth in an attempt to prove I am saying something more than what I have said. Out of respect for you and your faith I feel it is best that we just leave the statement that the Catholic church actually owns the Bible, the Word of God, alone and in this you include the books of the Torah. This makes sense to you? Wow. I am leaving it alone.

And please don’t take the time and go through the trouble of finding Catholic Canon that says that the Jewish religion can not claim ownership of the texts that form the basis of their religion. It means nothing to me and even less to the Jewish people I am sure.

By the way, I said** YOUR ARGUMENTS,** those statements you made in an earlier post to Daler, were on a weak foundation as you tried to prove a point by saying there were an absence of artifacts. What I said had not a thing to do with the Bible. It is very twisted logic to say that it did.

It appears you want to argue with me just to argue. This is silly.
 
Little Star -

I was making a point… 😛

that through history, no one has found or claimed to have the body of Jesus or Mary. This fact supports the Christian belief that Jesus was resurrected and the Catholic belief of Mary’s Assumption into Heaven. Both are in stark contrast to the burial remains of the apostles and saints through time.
…whilst also there has been no claim whatsoever of any witness to His resurrected body…
 
…whilst also there has been no claim whatsoever of any witness to His resurrected body…
Sure there were. He appeared to all his apostles with a glorified body upon his return to earth after his death. That’s why he could move through walls and why people did not immediately recognize him. Good article here.
 
No, the Bible is the Word of God.
Great Little Star… by saying that you implicitly recognize the authority of the Catholic Church.
So, whatever has been handed down by Catholic Councils means nothing to me.
But the councils handed down the bible…
Are you aware that at one time the church doctrine forbid laymen to read the Bible?
LIttle Star, they were instructing the faithful to not read bible translations that were not approved by the Church. Some were heretical. The Church never forbid one from reading an approved translation. You’ve been misled in this regards…
A Pope said that Mary of Magdalene was a prostitute.
A confusing subject this is over history. Great article here. Don’t confuse theological speculation with Catholic doctrine.
The Councils are made up of men. They are not infallible.
Yes, Christ set up the Bishops as men. On a personal level they are fallible but when the Church - the Pope and Magisterium are speaking publically (not private letters or opinion) on faith and morals, they are infallible.
As they were the authority within the Catholic church, they placed errors within the church doctrine.
No. Catholic Church doctrine has never changed. Not once.
They made rulings that placed a great deal of authority over the lives of common men to increase their own power.
No, they are teaching on faith and morals which many object to for various reason. Better to conform oneself to the apostolic teaching handed down by Christ through the Church than find a Church that conforms to our own made-up morality.
THE COUNCIL OF TARRAGONA - 1234 A.D.
The Council of Tarragona of 1234, in its second canon, ruled that:
“No one may possess the books of the Old and New Testaments in the Romance language, and if anyone possesses them he must turn them over to the local bishop within eight days after promulgation of this decree, so that they may be burned lest, be he a cleric or a layman, he be suspected until he is cleared of all suspicion.”
Yes, this is speaking to faulty or heretical translations. Prior to the printing press, it took about 3 years for the bible to be copied onto velum. So say $75K for a bible. Only Churches had them and the Church chained them to the ceiling when not in use so that they would be stolen. The same was true of “college textbooks” in that day… universities would chain them to tables.
I read the Bible to understand God’s relationship with man to better understand who I am to God.
Best though to read it through the lens of the Church that produced it. 😉
I have been directed in another way.
Directed by who or what authority? Curious I am…
Truth is Truth.
👍 Agreed! And the bible says the pillar and bulwark of Truth is the Church! 1 Timothy 3:15 below

15 if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.
You shall not convince me otherwise any more than what I say will convince you.
Could be…
I am not trying to convince you of anything other than I respect your chosen religion and that you have chosen it.
I respect you Little Star as one who love’s God. But that love entails following Jesus, his Church established on earth and the teachings of the Church on faith and morals.
And please don’t take the time and go through the trouble of finding Catholic Canon that says that the Jewish religion can not claim ownership of the texts that form the basis of their religion. It means nothing to me and even less to the Jewish people I am sure.
Fair enough. But the Jewish people did not have an agreed to canon at time of Christ.
It appears you want to argue with me just to argue. This is silly.
I’m not arguing… really I’m not. Just sharing the Catholic faith. Is that not why we are here on CAF?

🙂

Pork
 
Great Little Star… by saying that you implicitly recognize the authority of the Catholic Church.

But the councils handed down the bible…

LIttle Star, they were instructing the faithful to not read bible translations that were not approved by the Church. Some were heretical. The Church never forbid one from reading an approved translation. You’ve been misled in this regards…

A confusing subject this is over history. Great article here. Don’t confuse theological speculation with Catholic doctrine.

Yes, Christ set up the Bishops as men. On a personal level they are fallible but when the Church - the Pope and Magisterium are speaking publically (not private letters or opinion) on faith and morals, they are infallible.

No. Catholic Church doctrine has never changed. Not once.

No, they are teaching on faith and morals which many object to for various reason. Better to conform oneself to the apostolic teaching handed down by Christ through the Church than find a Church that conforms to our own made-up morality.

Yes, this is speaking to faulty or heretical translations. Prior to the printing press, it took about 3 years for the bible to be copied onto velum. So say $75K for a bible. Only Churches had them and the Church chained them to the ceiling when not in use so that they would be stolen. The same was true of “college textbooks” in that day… universities would chain them to tables.

Best though to read it through the lens of the Church that produced it. 😉

Directed by who or what authority? Curious I am…

👍 Agreed! And the bible says the pillar and bulwark of Truth is the Church! 1 Timothy 3:15 below

15 if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth.

Could be…

I respect you Little Star as one who love’s God. But that love entails following Jesus, his Church established on earth and the teachings of the Church on faith and morals.

Fair enough. But the Jewish people did not have an agreed to canon at time of Christ.

I’m not arguing… really I’m not. Just sharing the Catholic faith. Is that not why we are here on CAF?

🙂

Pork
You are arguing and repeatedly trying to state that the Catholic church has authority which I, and millions of others, do not recognize. I will not continue in this as it is pointless and silly. If someone politely says to you, I respect your views, respect mine, then the proper thing to do is to leave them alone. The Catholic church is a great and wonderful institution for Catholics. For those of us that are not, it has no authority over us and whatever its doctrine may say, it is meaningless to us. So, please, cut it out. I came on this thread to discuss the Baha’i faith with Baha’i members.

Were its doctrines correct when it launched the Crusades? How about the Spanish Inquisition? What about its activities related to the Nazis? What about how it treated the unwed mothers and their children in Europe during the sixties that were placed in its care? Do you agree with the doctrine that lead to millions upon millions of souls being murdered and tortured or forced to leave their homes over the years since the church’s inception? Many could argue that the church lost whatever covenant with the Lord it believed it had when it engaged in these types of atrocities. You say its leaders were infallible, so I guess you do. Leave it alone please.
 
Sure there were. He appeared to all his apostles with a glorified body upon his return to earth after his death. That’s why he could move through walls and why people did not immediately recognize him. Good article here.
…so were the people who wrote that He moved through walls actual witnesses to the occurrence?
 
jCC –

But God is Truth and can not contradict himself. Jesus Christ can not be both the Son of God incarnate (Christianity) and just a prophet and/or man (non-Christians). So yes, I can deny that God has spoken through Muhammed, Bab and Baha’u’llah and that is not placing limitations on God.
It is saying that your understanding and that of the Church about the reality of Jesus Christ, is definitive and final. But if God is the Creator of all things and All powerful, how can he be limited by the understanding of humans. I accept that the authoritative interpretations of the Church stand above human interpretations, but fall short of the full reality of God.
 
It is saying that your understanding and that of the Church about the reality of Jesus Christ, is definitive and final. But if God is the Creator of all things and All powerful, how can he be limited by the understanding of humans. I accept that the authoritative interpretations of the Church stand above human interpretations, but fall short of the full reality of God.
She doesn’t understand the thought behind your post. She can’t see that the Lord is so much more than her limited doctrine. Her doctrine, not that of the Catholic or any other church.

So, it is pointless to discuss it with her. I have had many, many discussions with Catholics, including members of the priesthood, and they would never dream of coming across to non-Catholics in the manner being done in her posts. For this reason, the nature of her comments, it is difficult for me to take her seriously. She sees herself as an expert. Please understand that she is not. Most of Catholicism concerns itself with the mystery and awe of God’s movements upon the Earth and in the lives of men. This quoting the Council to attempt to obliterate the right of others to maintain their beliefs as they see fit, is not what most Catholics do as most allow others the dignity to hold onto their own beliefs. I have worked within inter-faith councils where someone that engaged in such talk would be banned. No one faith knows or holds the full reality of God. It is impossible for man to even truly conceive of it. Yet, she will come back and say “well the Council of such and such determined that there is only one truth and that truth belongs lock stock and barrel to the Catholic church”. This is preposterous. The Truth is God’s not the Catholic church’s. Millions have been slaughtered as a result of her type of thinking.

For me, I am getting out of this thread. It is a shame as I am sure it was started as a sharing experience.

Love ya my Baha’i brother.
 
…so were the people who wrote that He moved through walls actual witnesses to the occurrence?
Servant,

We can read what is in John 20 :

19 On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being shut where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” 20 When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. 21 Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.” 22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”and

26 Eight days later, his disciples were again in the house, and Thomas was with them. The doors were shut, but Jesus came and stood among them, and said, “Peace be with you.” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side; do not be faithless, but believing.” 28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.”

It’s important to understand the purpose of the Book of John was described by St. John (bolded by me).

30 Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.

The Ascension is described by St John in both his Gospel and in the Book of Acts.

50 Then he led them out as far as Bethany, and lifting up his hands he blessed them. 51 While he blessed them, he parted from them and was carried up into heaven.* 52 And they worshiped him, and[j] returned to Jerusalem with great joy, 53 and were continually in the temple blessing God.

9 When he had said this, as they were looking on, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him from their sight. 10 While they were looking intently at the sky as he was going, suddenly two men dressed in white garments stood beside them. 11 They said, “Men of Galilee, why are you standing there looking at the sky? This Jesus who has been taken up from you into heaven will return in the same way as you have seen him going into heaven.”

The Ascension is described separately by St. Mark (who was the scribe for the apostle St. Peter)

19 So then the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven, and sat down at the right hand of God. 20 And they went forth and preached everywhere, while the Lord worked with them and confirmed the message by the signs that attended it. Amen.

So in kind of a summary, Jesus the Son of God was written about prior to his life by the Old Testament Prophets, he said during his life multiple times that he was God, he performed many miracles while on earth to show his divinity (healings, changing water to wine, walking on water, silencing the sea among others) his apostles were witnesses to his death, resurrection and ascension.

And his twelve apostles after his resurrection, as they split up to preach the Gospel, all preached the same theology of the seven sacraments no matter where they went in the world, including sacramental baptism, the forgiveness of sins and the Eucharist.

Pork*
 
It is saying that your understanding and that of the Church about the reality of Jesus Christ, is definitive and final. But if God is the Creator of all things and All powerful, how can he be limited by the understanding of humans. I accept that the authoritative interpretations of the Church stand above human interpretations, but fall short of the full reality of God.
JCC -

Keeping in mind then that God is Truth and can not contradict himself. He can not have revelation that says both:
  1. Jesus is the Son of God
  2. Jesus is not the Son of God
OR
  1. Jesus is God
  2. Jesus is not God
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top