G
GaryTaylor
Guest
I’m sorry we crossed posts. Servant your like luminosity in the early AM. I love your mind!!!My apologies I failed in conveying my thoughts to you
God bless you, and I love you too Gary
.
I’m sorry we crossed posts. Servant your like luminosity in the early AM. I love your mind!!!My apologies I failed in conveying my thoughts to you
God bless you, and I love you too Gary
.
Perhaps, but I am trying to give you my undivided attention.I think arthra gave you a very good response.
I hope to get some response from you regarding post #96.We have in no way concluded that Jesus DID claim to be God. He allowed people to draw conclusions which were in no way harmful to them.
This is the first point: to know exactly what was written, the text as such.
Secondly, Origen read the Bible systematically with his famous Commentaries. They reproduced faithfully the explanations that the teacher offered during his lessons at Alexandria and Caesarea.
Origen proceeded verse by verse with a detailed, broad and analytical approach, with philological and doctrinal notes. He worked with great precision in order to know completely what the sacred authors meant.
Lastly, even before his ordination to the priesthood, Origen was deeply dedicated to preaching the Bible and adapted himself to a varied public. In any case, the teacher can also be perceived in his Homilies, wholly dedicated as he was to the systematic interpretation of the passage under examination, which he analyzed step by step in the sequence of the verses.
Also in his Homilies, Origen took every opportunity to recall the different dimensions of the sense of Sacred Scripture that encourage or express a process of growth in the faith: there is the “literal” sense, but this conceals depths that are not immediately apparent.
The second dimension is the “moral” sense: what we must do in living the word; and finally, the “spiritual” sense, the unity of Scripture which throughout its development speaks of Christ.
It is the Holy Spirit who enables us to understand the Christological content, hence, the unity in diversity of Scripture. It would be interesting to demonstrate this. I have made a humble attempt in my book, Jesus of Nazareth, to show in today’s context these multiple dimensions of the Word, of Sacred Scripture, whose historical meaning must in the first place be respected.
But this sense transcends us, moving us towards God in the light of the Holy Spirit, and shows us the way, shows us how to live. Mention of it is found, for example, in the ninth Homily on Numbers, where Origen likens Scripture to [fresh] walnuts: “The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets at the school of Christ is like this”, the homilist says; “the letter is bitter, like the [green-covered] skin; secondly, you will come to the shell, which is the moral doctrine; thirdly, you will discover the meaning of the mysteries, with which the souls of the saints are nourished in the present life and the future” (Hom. Num. 9, 7).
google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vatican.va%2Fholy_father%2Fbenedict_xvi%2Faudiences%2F2007%2Fdocuments%2Fhf_ben-xvi_aud_20070425_en.html&ei=g–GVL2bDoWjNq32gSg&usg=AFQjCNHJ2ZQVy_RL_UiIBeUH5EbjUjlwZgIt was especially on this route that Origen succeeded in effectively promoting the “Christian interpretation” of the Old Testament, brilliantly countering the challenge of the heretics, especially the Gnostics and Marcionites, who made the two Testaments disagree to the extent that they rejected the Old Testament.
None.Once it is accepted that Jesus did claim to be God, then the resulting question is whether His claims are true. Ultimately, the possibilities are:
Lunatic, liar or Lord. Those are the options. Which will you choose?
- Jesus was a lunatic. He was not God, but He genuinely believed that He was because He was mentally unstable.
- Jesus was a liar. He was not God, and He knew He was not God, but He claimed to be God anyway.
- Jesus was Lord. He was God, He knew He was God, and He proclaimed Himself to be God.
My apologies if I have missed something along the way. As you can see I am addresssing a LOT of points…Perhaps, but I am trying to give you my undivided attention.
I hope to get some response from you regarding post #96.
Thanks.
That would be fine if the implicit understanding of scripture couldn’t be explicitly known, since the scriptures were written through the Spirit of God, Thus they have not only the meaning which seems apparent but another which escapes most because of divine revelation. The words written are the forms of the mysteries and images of the Divine of the Church since the scripture is of the Church deposited within the Church. In this matter the opinion of the entire orthodox Church is one, that the whole law is spiritual, the spiritual law conveyed however, is not known by all.None.
Jesus was not lunatic, liar or Lord. Jesus was a % 100 trusty and wise humanbeing and a prophet. There is no a verse in Bible which view Jesus directly said that He is Son of God. That are all argues from analogy which made by Christians.
Jesus never sait to be Son of God. Forexample John 1:1. Is that Word Jesus? Can not that be understood in a different way? There may be very different interpretations. Or ıs Bible original as ıt was written initially? There are many problems.
Why did the Jews pick up rocks with which to stone Jesus after he said, “I AM” (which is the name of God in the Hebrew Scriptures)?None.
Jesus was not lunatic, liar or Lord. Jesus was a % 100 trusty and wise humanbeing and a prophet. There is no a verse in Bible which view Jesus directly said that He is Son of God. That are all argues from analogy which made by Christians.
No, it can’t.Jesus never sait to be Son of God. Forexample John 1:1. Is that Word Jesus? Can not that be understood in a different way?
Yes, and it is a common misunderstanding among Muslims that the text of the Bible is corrupted. This is just an excuse used to dismiss the claims of Christianity, but it is a weak argument. Proof is available if you are actually interested.Or ıs Bible original as ıt was written initially?
No, my friend. There are only excuses used by those who seek to promote another prophet and another religion.There are many problems.
I do understand how non-Catholics can get swarmed. I’m doing my best to keep the thread focused, but a crowd seems to have gathered.My apologies if I have missed something along the way. As you can see I am addresssing a LOT of points…
I will have a good look at that post tomorrow
.
Bible was revealed to Jesus totally at once. That occured through Spirit(Gabriel) and Jesus conveyed Bible during His life. After about 60 years later saints wrote Gospels. So writting of Gospels by saints is not a divine action. We have not the original texts and there maybe misinterpretations because Gospels were translated for many times.That would be fine if the implicit understanding of scripture couldn’t be explicitly known, since the scriptures were written through the Spirit of God, Thus they have not only the meaning which seems apparent but another which escapes most because of divine revelation. The words written are the forms of the mysteries and images of the Divine of the Church since the scripture is of the Church deposited within the Church. In this matter the opinion of the entire orthodox Church is one, that the whole law is spiritual, the spiritual law conveyed however, is not known by all.
Jews have killed many prophets. When a prophet asserted to be sent by God unbelievers did bad things. Jesus said that “I am sent by God” , “I am prophet of God on the world” … Many pagans pick up stones for Muhammed when He claimed to be prophet. Muhammed was in wounds and bruises.Randy Carson; [QUOTE said:12556518]Why did the Jews pick up rocks with which to stone Jesus after he said, “I AM” (which is the name of God in the Hebrew Scriptures)?
No, it can’t.
Jesus is word of God(Kelimetullah) and Spirit of God(Ruhullah). But Christians interpret this in a wrong way. They assume an other God as word or Son and the other as Holy Spirit. Interesting! There are some reason for Jesus to be called as word of God. The word was from(sent by) God and the words which came out from mouth of Jesus were words from God.
- Jesus is the Word. (Jn 1:14)
- The Word was God. (Jn 1:1)
- Therefore, Jesus is God.
Mary is the Queen of Heaven and we are very pleased with that.And by the way, did you know that Mary (Miriam) is the Queen of Heaven?
Matthew - And Jesus said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19"I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.Bible was revealed to Jesus totally at once. That occured through Spirit(Gabriel) and Jesus conveyed Bible during His life. After about 60 years later saints wrote Gospels. So writting of Gospels by saints is not a divine action. We have not the original texts and there maybe misinterpretations because Gospels were translated for many times.
Quran is revelation directly from God but although Quran can be understood in many ways by people and some of these ways could be wrong. We have many examples in the past and now. So Holy tradition may not be so holy! And that spiritual laws maybe not so spiritual. There have been many wrong things in Church. If God have been leading Church in every manner than there would not be so bad things. A faith was not deposited in Church truely but a faith have been raised in Church(that Trinity doctrine).
The most extremely issue cannot be a mystery! If Jesus were Son of God there should be many obvious proofs.
Which Gospel is original? Are all Gospels same? What happened at First Council of Nicaea?Yes, and it is a common misunderstanding among Muslims that the text of the Bible is corrupted. This is just an excuse used to dismiss the claims of Christianity, but it is a weak argument. Proof is available if you are actually interested.
No, my friend. There are only excuses used by those who seek to promote another prophet and another religion.
Matthew - And Jesus said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who
GaryTaylor;12557131:
John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.Not “My Father” but “My God”. Who respect Jesus he will get keys kingdom of Heavens. I respect
Again “My God”. All prophet said same things. That word of God may have been changed as father in translations.
As an authority of religion yes that all has been given to prophets on the world. But that authority is not like a king.
So Jesus was not president or king of a state. If Jesus had had a deity power as God all things would be very different! But Jesus Himself says that authority was given to Him but that is not property of Him because every property and power is belong to God. If Jesus was part of deity than He would not say such thing.
Couldn’t you think that which is revealed in Quran as truly?
The Church discerned the four Gospels through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, Jesus as never wrote a word. Jesus left a Church which the apostles established guided by the Holy Spirit. Before anything was the liturgy and mass, of whichWhich Gospel is original? Are all Gospels same? What happened at First Council of Nicaea?
The Catholic Church gave us the version of which is still read and inspired by the Holy Spirit today.the relationship between worship and belief, and is an ancient Christian principle which provided a measure for developing the ancient Christian creeds, the canon of scripture and other doctrinal matters based on the prayer texts of the Church, that is, the Church’s liturgy.wiki pedia
True. However, on this occasion, the passage reveals more than that:Jews have killed many prophets. When a prophet asserted to be sent by God unbelievers did bad things. Jesus said that “I am sent by God” ,
No. You are mistaken. Christians do not believe another God is the Son and another God is the Spirit. We believe there is only One God. Within the interior life of that One God are Three Persons - Father, Son and Holy Spirit.Jesus is word of God(Kelimetullah) and Spirit of God(Ruhullah). But Christians interpret this in a wrong way. They assume an other God as word or Son and the other as Holy Spirit.
This is true on two levels. First because Jesus was fully man, He was sent by God to proclaim the Good News to the Jews. Second, because Jesus is fully God, He “proceeds from the Father” in the interior life of the God.Interesting! There are some reason for Jesus to be called as word of God. The word was from(sent by) God and the words which came out from mouth of Jesus were words from God.
:clapping:Mary is the Queen of Heaven and we are very pleased with that.
GaryTaylor;12557131:
I could see how one might come to these conclusions, but I think your missing the point we had no translations as there was none to have. The mysteries of the Church as history indicates fell upon difficult times for all those believing Christ was indeed God. Hard reality to wrap ones head around.Not “My Father” but “My God”. Who respect Jesus he will get keys kingdom of Heavens. I respect
Again “My God”. All prophet said same things. That word of God may have been changed as father in translations.
As an authority of religion yes that all has been given to prophets on the world. But that authority is not like a king.
So Jesus was not president or king of a state. If Jesus had had a deity power as God all things would be very different! But Jesus Himself says that authority was given to Him but that is not property of Him because every property and power is belong to God. If Jesus was part of deity than He would not say such thing.
Couldn’t you think that which is revealed in Quran as truly?
His authority is as King as its written also, He does have authority over all and it is very different as the morality has permeated throughout the world.
John 12:15
Verse Concepts
“FEAR NOT, DAUGHTER OF ZION; BEHOLD, YOUR KING IS COMING, SEATED ON A DONKEY’S COLT.”
google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.catholicbible101.com%2Fthechurchthenewisrael.htm&ei=kGSHVLyTCoz7gwTbo4HADg&usg=AFQjCNFRd8kLlDgFbTEc3YFcwU3ioS4ZKQ&bvm=bv.81449611,d.eXYDavid was the King of Israel. Jesus is the King of Kings who sits on David’s throne.
Matthew, Mark and Luke were all written before AD 70 when the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. John was written about AD 95.Which Gospel is original?
No. And this is a GOOD thing. The differences actually enhance the credibility of the story of Jesus.Are all Gospels same?
Among other things, the Council formulated the Nicene Creed or statement of belief generally held by all Christians to this day. That Creed included the Trinitarian formula for our understanding of God. This was important, and here’s why:What happened at First Council of Nicaea?
GaryTaylor;12557131:
How does one explain that Jesus said that the authority was given to Him? Why would it be necessary to give Him authority if He already had it?Not “My Father” but “My God”. Who respect Jesus he will get keys kingdom of Heavens. I respect
Again “My God”. All prophet said same things. That word of God may have been changed as father in translations.
As an authority of religion yes that all has been given to prophets on the world. But that authority is not like a king.
So Jesus was not president or king of a state. If Jesus had had a deity power as God all things would be very different! But Jesus Himself says that authority was given to Him but that is not property of Him because every property and power is belong to God. If Jesus was part of deity than He would not say such thing.