Rev Kenin, please don’t cry foul. When you came here you knew you were coming to a Catholic forum. You knew beforehand Catholics disagreed with you.
Not crying foul. I believe this is a NON-CATHOLIC RELIGIONS FORUM am I not right. Isn’t that what it says, or am I reading it wrong?
For us it is not about winning. It about sharing the truth.
Don’t tell me, tell your people that, they are the ones who are trying to win not me. I’m in no fight here just want solid answers.
Yes the word is sharing. Sharing your truth and letting others share their without judging them or telling them they are wrong Or is this a one way sharing experience. Will share ours with you but don’t share your with us because we don’t want to here it and we will call you ignorant or a fool.
Here is the definition of Share {oh by the way I have been but down for using the dictionary also} but what the h—. A part or portion given to or by one person, one of equal parts, as the capital stock in a corporation. To divide or distrubute portions. See you share and I share one person to another. If not sure ask your children what the word share means they should be able to tell you.
Like I said, you knew Catholics don’t agree with you, but you hoped to find a bunch of now-nothings who would run for cover immediately after your arrival on this forum.
WHAT? First of all I never said they had to agree with me. What is a now-nothings?
Your people are attacking me for asking questions and wanting proof of your claims besides “the truth” or “the church” solid proof. Is that such a problem. If they run for cover then maybe they are not sure of their faith or how strong it is because I thought you Catholics are relentless and won’t back down form defending your faith. But instead one person makes them run. How funny.
That has always been the danger of sectarianism. People are made to feel confident in their new-found faith, thinking they can easily demolish any Catholic claim – until they eventually encounter Catholics who really know their faith and are determined to defend it. With the lie exposed, those who were once confident in themselves, are in danger of losing faith altogether.
I’m not demolishing any claim. All I asked for was solid proof. How is that demolishing. I think your people need to take a look at who’s demolishing who’s claims. Our’s is the only one and true religion, your religion is not, your not ordained because only a priest can be.
Now don’t feed me that ---- your people are the ones who are demolishing others. I beleive I have said that I don’t care what you believe or at what age you baptize but, no that wasn’t good enough lets keep on harping on him about it, so then I go on the defensive {who wouldn’t your people have many times} and now I get this. They have told me that I’m being ignorant because I don’t accept their answer. I have been called a fool because I still question their answer. So I ask you who is doing it to who? Who is demolishing who religion? Not me.
placido