L
LegoGE1947
Guest
I was saying this sarcastically. There are some Protestants who do not recognize any other version of the Bible, Catholic or not, except the KJV. Yes I know the KJV was not around for the apostles and that they didn’t speak or write in Shakespearian English. Was only making a little humor. Thanks and God bless!Originally Posted by LegoGE1947
As we all know, if the KJV is good enough for Apostle Paul, it should be good enough for us
sallybutler’s problem about LegoGE1947’s post quoted above may be the same as mine. Let me express my problem as: How can a man of the first century AD pass judgment as “good enough” on the work of another human being who was to be born centuries after his death? In other words: How did it happen that St. Paul (a man who lived during the first century AD) be able to evaluate the KJV and say that it was good enough? I can say with full certainty that the grandfather of King James of England was not yet born when St. Paul died.
The truth is those who champion the KJV and say that Catholics are not biblical are exposing themselves to be not biblical because the KJV itself is never appearing in any the of the original manuscripts of the Bible.