Baptizing Baby of Lesbian Mothers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Styner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
jamesclaude said:
“They” refers to my lesbian neighbors-on my street
  • not “THEY” in general.
“They” have names. Marti and Samantha. I just called 'em up and guess what ? They’ve never marched in a parade. Samantha belongs to Daughters of the American Revolution, though…

Didn’t have to stand here for too long to hear “gay agenda”

I asked what Sam and Marti’s “gay agenda” is for tomorrow - they’re painting an elderly woman’s house - to help her out.

Us versus THEM
pursed lips - righteous snippets
cuttingly cruel
always right

never taking into consideration
that it’s real people
they’re snarling about

Mice in the cookie jar -
pretending to be cookies…

Selected scriptures
selected sins
the buffet line is open -

take your pick
choose carefully!

knowing the lines , the songs
not knowing why
but deftly playing Church

with claw hammers
 
40.png
Convert97:
This is one of those questions that make people think the Catholic Church hates gays and lesbians. However, such a discussion won’t answer the original question. Dr. Colussus gave the clearest answer. These ladies should take their question to a priest, who will be able to discern their intentions. Only “another Christ” can make a decision whether to deny a child the grace of baptism. As for the women running to the Episcopal Church, they should know that running away from the truth won’t make it go away.
Who said anything about running AWAY from TRUTH ?

You guys have got the market cornered on telling others how to suffer !
 
40.png
ByzCath:
Great point and I think the answer is far more sinister than you state here.

They will sue for discrimination and defamation of character.

Just as some in the “Gay Movement” have stated that once they get the right to marry in all the states they will start to sue the Churches that will not marry them for denying their civil rights.

Just another step in their agenda.
“SOME” ?

A good reporter always includes who, what, where and when.

This sounds about as willy-nilly as the rumor about John Kerry’s plans to “ban the Bible” if elected president. ( West VA )

What’s the “gay movement” ? Do they give you a pink toaster if you join ?

December 6 + St. Nicholas +
 
jamesclaude said:
“SOME” ?

What’s the “gay movement” ? Do they give you a pink toaster if you join ?
/QUOTE]

No, a lavender toaster. Silly Jamesclaude, pink is for GIRLS!

Lisa N
 
40.png
jamesclaude:
Who said anything about running AWAY from TRUTH ?

You guys have got the market cornered on telling others how to suffer !
Post # 6.
 
The catholic church requires one parent or guardian in good standing for infant baptism.
The reason for this is that the faith spoken for is not of the child but of the parent and that faith is assumed to be a catholic in good standing who beleives in the basic moral precepts of the church.

If this mother would go to confession and put away her lover the child would be admitted. Also the child is free to announce her own faith and is elgible for baptism independant of her fornicating mother once she is older.
 
TarAshly said:
“theres no such thing as the mafia” sorry had to throw in a little sopranos quote there. that show is my guilty pleasure. as far as the thread goes, its wrong for them to even have a child. HOWEVER a baby cant help who its born to and should not be denied the right to a baptism. again i dont know the rules on this but thats just my opinion.

Lived in Sicily for 3 years, and there is very much a such thing as the Mafia. The Italian government even has a special class of police to deal with them, a special wing of the Carabinieri (State Police).
 
As long as she is willing to live with the priest telling her that her livestyle is incompatable with Catholicism. The point here is that she is NOT the parent of the child, the mother is not Catholic, and the father is in abstentia.
40.png
catsrus:
Is it possible for a priest to baptize the child in a small private ceremony without the hoopla? Since the women don’t want attention, this might work. At least the poor little mite will be forgiven original sin and hopefully will come to faith as it grows. The one who calls herself Catholic should contact a priest for an answer.
Sheesh! What a tangled web…
 
T

You’re right, I’ve even written the “How To” guide that is required reading for the conservative posters in this forum. Sorry you didn’t get the memo.
40.png
jamesclaude:
Who said anything about running AWAY from TRUTH ?

You guys have got the market cornered on telling others how to suffer !
 
Wow! I really wasn’t expecting so many varied responses on this topic. Thanks to everyone for their thoughts.

Just to add a few more details for clarity’s sake, I wanted to add that the non-Catholic birth mother has a great deal of respect and love for her Catholic partner. The Catholic partner was raised in the church and is very devoted to her religion. She does her very best to adhere to the religion, and I realize that many of you reading this will argue that she has one big, glaring, obvious problem regarding her sexuality and her faith. But I feel that is a private issue between her and God and have never bothered discussing it with her.

The Catholic partner in this couple truly wants the baby that they raise together to be baptised and raised in the Catholic faith. The other partner is not affiliated with any religion but wants to honor her partners wishes because of the devotion and respect they have for one another. So the question is this: regardless of the home situation of a child, would the church really turn away anyone who wants to commit their baby to the Catholic faith and to God?

Oh - and I just have to add this and I am not trying to cause a ruckus - I truly came here with an open mind and heart to try to find answers for friends of mine. I hate to tell you, but there is NO gay agenda. I know several dozen gay folks because of my career and all I have ever seen are just people trying to live their lives, pay their mortgages, walk the dog and come home to a warm meal after work. Please, don’t marginalize others by lumping them into a general catagory of “they”, and in return, I won’t stand by and silently listen to someone marginalize Catholics.

Thanks again!
 
I wonder what people here would say if a 42 year old man married his 16 year old niece, had a baby, and he wanted the baby baptised in the Church, insisting he wanted his son to be raised as a devout Catholic?
 
40.png
Styner:
Wow! I really wasn’t expecting so many varied responses on this topic. Thanks to everyone for their thoughts.

Just to add a few more details for clarity’s sake, I wanted to add that the non-Catholic birth mother has a great deal of respect and love for her Catholic partner. The Catholic partner was raised in the church and is very devoted to her religion. She does her very best to adhere to the religion, and I realize that many of you reading this will argue that she has one big, glaring, obvious problem regarding her sexuality and her faith. But I feel that is a private issue between her and God and have never bothered discussing it with her.
I think this is the issue here.

You have a person who says they are Catholic but then choses to live a life that is incompatible with that Faith.

Then you have people who know this person and know what they are doing is wrong but put the blinders on saying that it is a private issue between her and God.

If it was a private issue between her and God then you would not know of it.

This past weekends Epistle reading has something to say here. (by the way, this was the Epistle reading for the Byzantine Catholic Chruches as we have a different litrugical calendar)

Galations 5:19 - 6:2

5 19:
Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness,
20: idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit,
21: envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
22: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
23: gentleness, self-control; against such there is no law.
24: And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
25: If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit.
26: Let us have no self-conceit, no provoking of one another, no envy of one another.

6 1: Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Look to yourself, lest you too be tempted.
2: Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.

And let us not forget the quote by Edmund Burke…
Edmund Burke:
All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing.
I like that so much and it goes very well with the quote already in my signature that I am going to add it there.
 
40.png
Styner:
Wow! I really wasn’t expecting so many varied responses on this topic. Thanks to everyone for their thoughts.

Just to add a few more details for clarity’s sake, I wanted to add that the non-Catholic birth mother has a great deal of respect and love for her Catholic partner. The Catholic partner was raised in the church and is very devoted to her religion. She does her very best to adhere to the religion, and I realize that many of you reading this will argue that she has one big, glaring, obvious problem regarding her sexuality and her faith. But I feel that is a private issue between her and God and have never bothered discussing it with her.
Styner, I know you have a kind heart and may not understand the “rukus” but this gets back to the basic question of what IS the point of baptizing the baby if the mother (or guardian or whatever) has rejected her Catholic faith? It sounds like one partner is going through the motions to please the other. The purported Catholic partner seems to be making Pascal’s Wager…I don’t really BELIEVE this stuff, but I’ll get the kid baptized just in case.

It’s sad that the innocent baby is a sort of pawn in the whole matter but it’s really a choice to be made and since the baby can’t make the choice at this time, it’s up to the mother to decide whether her faith or her “lifestyle” is more important. You do not HAVE to be a Catholic. But if you make that commitment, I really think it ought to be taken seriously. What kind of promise is more important than a promise to God?

Lisa N
 
40.png
ByzCath:
I think this is the issue here.

You have a person who says they are Catholic but then choses to live a life that is incompatible with that Faith.

Then you have people who know this person and know what they are doing is wrong but put the blinders on saying that it is a private issue between her and God.
Sorry, ByzCath, but the issue truly is whether or not the church would turn away a child that the parents wish to have baptized and committed to the faith.

I’m not Catholic. I have no argument to offer a lesbian who chooses to remain Catholic, or a Catholic who chooses to remain lesbian. I’m just trying to get educated about the situation involving the baby and the church.

I posted on AAA on recieved a more thoughtful, and surprisingly moderate response with regards to the child in question.

Thanks for your thoughts.
 
40.png
Styner:
Sorry, ByzCath, but the issue truly is whether or not the church would turn away a child that the parents wish to have baptized and committed to the faith.

I’m not Catholic. I have no argument to offer a lesbian who chooses to remain Catholic, or a Catholic who chooses to remain lesbian. I’m just trying to get educated about the situation involving the baby and the church.

I posted on AAA on recieved a more thoughtful, and surprisingly moderate response with regards to the child in question.

Thanks for your thoughts.
No the issue at hand is what we have been discussing.

Just as stated in the answer to your question posted in AAA.
Michelle Arnold:
Unless there is danger of death, in which case anyone may baptize a child below the age of reason, one or both parents must give their consent and there must be “a well-founded hope” that the child will be raised Catholic.
The fact is that this would be an uphill battle for the child to be raise in the true Catholic Faith. I can understand you not being able to see this.
 
Lisa N:
back to the basic question of what IS the point of baptizing the baby if the mother (or guardian or whatever) has rejected her Catholic faith?
Hi Lisa N - Quite the contrary. As much as it sounds ridiculous, the Catholic partner in this couple is very devoted to her faith. I don’t understand her faith vs. sexuality issues or rational myself. But she is very committed to the Catholic teachings and wants the baby raised with those teachings. Think of it as "I’m an adult and I’ve made a choice that goes against my religious upbringing but I feel that my religious training has immense value and is still center in my life. It is those same teachings that she wishes to instill in the child.
Lisa N:
What kind of promise is more important than a promise to God?
Perhaps this is what she is thinking when she expresses her desire to commit the baby to the Lord.

Thanks for food for thought.
 
i don’t know how realistic it is to expect 2 people who would not be practicing catholics, or vehemently disposed to any moral code that the church professes want to have their child baptized in the catholic church…

if they did, my guess is that one or more of the pair might be taking another look at their life style and for fear of their soul or the soul of their child wish to start afresh with the baptism of their child. Who in God’s name are we to say otherwise… Only God knows what’s in the persons heart…

I would assume that the priest will properly dispose the parent/s of the child…

the baptism will certainly benefit the child, and who knows, it may be the start of conversion for one or more of the parents… Either way, Jesus Chirst didn’t tell those who sinned to leave him… he included those that were in need of spiritual help…

Splinters and timbers… you can’t witness, or help those you shut the door to…

At anygiven time in a so-called christians life mortal sin seperates us from God… and we need each others help to find our way back. If we fall, or fail, it’s not the duty of the members of the body to pitch them out into the street an point fingers and euphemistically stone them…

i suggest you think twice about exclusion, let God decide what’s in the heart of someone who doesn’t live as you think they should.

your really not qualified… :cool:
 
jamesclaude said:
“They” refers to my lesbian neighbors-on my street
  • not “THEY” in general.
“They” have names. Marti and Samantha. I just called 'em up and guess what ? They’ve never marched in a parade. Samantha belongs to Daughters of the American Revolution, though…

Didn’t have to stand here for too long to hear “gay agenda”

I asked what Sam and Marti’s “gay agenda” is for tomorrow - they’re painting an elderly woman’s house - to help her out.

Us versus THEM
pursed lips - righteous snippets
cuttingly cruel
always right

never taking into consideration
that it’s real people
they’re snarling about

Mice in the cookie jar -
pretending to be cookies…

Selected scriptures
selected sins
the buffet line is open -

take your pick
choose carefully!

knowing the lines , the songs
not knowing why
but deftly playing Church

with claw hammers

i understand where your coming from, i wish the church could open its mind and arms more to the outside community, however not all catholics are this way. i am a Catholic woman, while i dont agree with gay marriage i also dont think they should be denied the holy sacraments such as communion and baptism, these things bring you closer to God why would anyone want to deny someone that right? God loves all people and while some people in this forum and in life like to play judge jury and executioner, not all of us feel that way. i dont want you to have a negative opinion of the Catholic faith. some of us let the church be the church, God be the judge and Jesus be the leader, while we are just his people and servants.
 
40.png
Scott_Lafrance:
I wonder what people here would say if a 42 year old man married his 16 year old niece, had a baby, and he wanted the baby baptised in the Church, insisting he wanted his son to be raised as a devout Catholic?
why does the gay issue always go straight to incest and beastiality!? are we really that afraid that if we allow gay people their right to live their lives people will want to marry their nieces and goats?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top