Barr asks US Attorney John Bash to review "unmasking" before and after 2016

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boatswain2PA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
After the Flynn transcripts they still have the nerve to pretend that they are victims?
Flynn lied clearly. His conversation was collusive.
He didn’t say a word about Russia’s interference, he actually did the opposite.
 
Maximus1 said:
His conversation was collusive.
Click to expand...
No matter how much you keep saying this, over and over, to your self in the mirror or screaming it on internet discussion boards…

…you cannot make it the truth.

Nothing in the conversation was inappropriate. The heavily biased FBI agents didn’t think so, and neither does anyone else with an ounce of common sense.
 
They prosecuted him and he lied and admitted it under oath. What is missing. He subsequently testified again and his plea was accepted by the court. What’s left but sentencing.
Where did he address their theft of private emails and interference? Keep looking, you won’t find it.
Why did he lie? Did he lie to mislead the public? Was he lying to hide the truth? Sure did!
These are inescapable truths. With these transcripts disclosed, the charade is over permenantly. Mueller’s report was accurate with Flynn. And what Barr did was egregious.
You are hung up with inappropriate. Of course it was inappropriate to whitewash Russian interference. This is not the issue. The issue was lying. Flynn knew it. He did it anyway. He became compromised when the transition team, and VP lied on TV. Flynn clearly made McFarland and others aware of the call and got their (name removed by moderator)ut on sanctions. McFarland I believe said Trump was possibly notified as well. They had a Counterintelligence basis to interview him when they did.
Also, the DOJ Memo SOMEHOW omits the investigatory basis of the investigation. 18 USC 951. They focus on the Logan Act. But that was not the basis.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top