Basic Adventist Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter SDAgirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Mike_D30:
My point is why not? (and you guys go way past most “Protestants” with your ideas).

If the Church was corrupted at the time of Constantine, and the Canon put together after the corruption, how can you trust the canon from a corrupted pagan Church? Not only the Canon but essentially every major tenet that Christians practice today from a Church controlled by emperors of pagan Rome?
Because we have faith that all scripture is inspired by the Holy Spirit, and that God would not allow his Holy Bible to be paganized. There has to be one true version that was preserved through the Dark Ages, otherwise we are ALL erring in the faith.
 
SDA girl, I will not be sarcastic, neither will I beat around the bush so to say.

First I think it is impossible to hate the Catholic Church and Catholicism, but love individual Catholics at the same time, you can not seperate them, individual Catholics are members of the Catholic church. You simply cannot beleive that the church is the Whore of Babylon, and the Pope the Antichrist while at the same time you say you love individual Catholics. That just defies belief.

Another thing I find impossible to understand is that SDAs claim to beleive in the Holy Trinity while at the same time believe that Jesus Christ is not only the second person of the Trinity and God the Son, but also he is supposedly the Archangel Micheal at the same time. He cannot be two different people at the same time, isn’t this more of a Quadernity, Father, Son, Spirit, Archangel all at the same time.

Also SDAs like other cultists, the Armstrongers try and blend Christianity and Judaism into one and the same religion. By insisting that Christians must observe the JEWISH sabbath, and keep the Mosaic Law, and also kkep kosher, avoiding so called “unclean” foods. In the vision given to Saint Peter, God clearly says that there is no such thing as “unclean” foods for Christians. Christians can eat anything they like, including pork, oysters, and catfish.
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
Protestants only had a problem with Catholic indulgences to start with.i.e. Luther The Bible is not what they had issue with, it was the interpretation by the mother church. Hence the protest. The validity of the Bible has never been in question for Adventism.
:hmmm: Okay…if the SDA is so squared away with it’s teachings, can you explain to us how you can believe that Jesus and the Archangel Michael are one and the same?

"So the archangel, whom we saw in Jude as also Michael, calls the dead to life. Only one person has been given that authority. “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” (Matt. 5:25-29)
“Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:” (John 11:25)
“I [Jesus] am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell [the grave] and of death.” (Rev. 1:18)

In other words, only Jesus Christ will call the dead, so he is the archangel in 1st Thessalonians 4:16, 17 and He is Michael who calls Moses to life in Jude. And He is Michael who, with His angels, cast Satan out of heaven! Compare Song 5:10 which harmonizes with our seeing Him as head of the angels.
In Joshua 5:15, Christ identifies Himself as the captain of the Lord’s host. He was the captain of the angels of heaven. They are the Lord’s army (Rev. 19:14). Furthermore, He would not have accepted Joshua’s worship if He had been an ordinary angel (see Joshua 5). Thus again He is the archangel, Michael. " LINK

I’ve read this all the way through a couple of times and it still makes me shake my head because it’s just plain wrong.
Pax vobiscum,
 
40.png
boppysbud:
SDA girl, I will not be sarcastic, neither will I beat around the bush so to say.

First I think it is impossible to hate the Catholic Church and Catholicism, but love individual Catholics at the same time, you can not seperate them, individual Catholics are members of the Catholic church. You simply cannot beleive that the church is the Whore of Babylon, and the Pope the Antichrist while at the same time you say you love individual Catholics. That just defies belief.

Another thing I find impossible to understand is that SDAs claim to beleive in the Holy Trinity while at the same time believe that Jesus Christ is not only the second person of the Trinity and God the Son, but also he is supposedly the Archangel Micheal at the same time. He cannot be two different people at the same time, isn’t this more of a Quadernity, Father, Son, Spirit, Archangel all at the same time.

Also SDAs like other cultists, the Armstrongers try and blend Christianity and Judaism into one and the same religion. By insisting that Christians must observe the JEWISH sabbath, and keep the Mosaic Law, and also kkep kosher, avoiding so called “unclean” foods. In the vision given to Saint Peter, God clearly says that there is no such thing as “unclean” foods for Christians. Christians can eat anything they like, including pork, oysters, and catfish.
First of all, there is no hate involved, as I have stated REPEATEDLY. Many Adventists have come out of Catholicism and do not hate their family, friends, etc. There is nothing cultish about Adventism. If it is different than you, its a cult? The vision of the net of animals, if you go back a couple verses, it was talking about the Gentiles. And a couple of verses after that, he tells them to go out and preach, not go out and eat. The avoiding certain foods is a choice not a doctrine as so often said. We are not kosher. I only have 1 fridge! And as far as the Michael thing, it is not a 4 person issue. We believe that Jesus is God, once man, creator, intercessor, friend, and at sometimes, warrior. Just like I am a wife, mother, daughter, friend, and sometimes, warrior! lol Thats where we stand.
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
We believe that the true fullness of the gospel was not re-achieved until around the 1700s. Luther, Zwingli, Huss, etc. all had a piece of inspiration which was pieced together. Hence the different denominations. When Luthers followers heard Huss’s message, they would not believe so another church was born and so on. What the Adventist church did was look to the Bible, determine what they thought to be the core truths, and create a faith based on the best they could do with the best knowledge they had. I’m sure a scholar could explain it better, I’m just a stay at home mom. lol But thats my answer to the best of my knowledge.
So from the year 100AD to 1700AD there was nobody who was preaching an undefiled Christian gospel? and even at 1700 wasnt enough, the millerite and then SDAs, that means it really came around during the 1800’s.

Does this sound correct to you? The year is 2006 lets minus 1800 years which leaves about 206 years (10% of Christian history) out of all this time that people figured out what the truth was.

Do you belive Jesus founded a Church that suddenly failed and it took 1700 years for people to find the truth? Some people would claim the Bible is clear enough for anyone to read and understand, yet why did not one person read and understand the “clear” teachings all these years?

Remember Constantine wasnt around till about 300AD that means from 100AD to 275AD according to you nobody was preaching the correct Christian message.
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
First of all, there is no hate involved, as I have stated REPEATEDLY.
Yes… but SDA actions and behavior appears hateful. To label other Christian organizations as the “Beast” and the “anti-christ” is certainly not a loving thing that one does to foster a good relationship. Yet this is exactly what Adventism does.

You said: There is nothing cultish about Adventism.

Actually, there are many things cultish about Adventism, which is why some still consider it a cult.

You said: The vision of the net of animals, if you go back a couple verses, it was talking about the Gentiles.

It did have a meaning for the gentiles, but Christ would not even symbolically command someone to do something that is wrong under all circumstances. Further Mark 7 states that ALL MEATS ARE CLEAN!!!

18 And He said^ to them, “Are you so lacking in understanding also? Do you not understand that whatever goes into the man from outside cannot defile him;
19 because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?” (Thus He declared all foods clean.)

By continuing to abstain from meats that Christ declared clean, you are making his declaration of all meats clean void.

You Said: The avoiding certain foods is a choice not a doctrine as so often said.

Actually this is not a true statement, fundamental belief #22 specifically states that Adventists will refrain from eating unclean meats. This is not a choice this is fundamental belief of Adventism as stated in its doctrines. Vegetarianism is however a choice.

As you will see from Mark 7, the SDA prohibition on unclean foods is in direct contradiction to scripture.

Brandon
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
I have noticed alot of ideas and questions about Adventism and our beliefs. Now, dont attack me with questions because I’m not that fast a typer, but if you have any basic questions on our fundamental beliefs, go ahead and ask. Maybe we can come to a better understanding of each other. 👍
I like your style! I wish more people followed it. We should all be out to learn as much as we can without trying to kill each other.
 
40.png
SDA2RC:
Yes… but SDA actions and behavior appears hateful. To label other Christian organizations as the “Beast” and the “anti-christ” is certainly not a loving thing that one does to foster a good relationship. Yet this is exactly what Adventism does.

You said: There is nothing cultish about Adventism.

Actually, there are many things cultish about Adventism, which is why some still consider it a cult.

You said: The vision of the net of animals, if you go back a couple verses, it was talking about the Gentiles.

It did have a meaning for the gentiles, but Christ would not even symbolically command someone to do something that is wrong under all circumstances. Further Mark 7 states that ALL MEATS ARE CLEAN!!!

18 And He said^ to them, “Are you so lacking in understanding also? Do you not understand that whatever goes into the man from outside cannot defile him;
19 because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?” (Thus He declared all foods clean.)

By continuing to abstain from meats that Christ declared clean, you are making his declaration of all meats clean void.

You Said: The avoiding certain foods is a choice not a doctrine as so often said.

Actually this is not a true statement, fundamental belief #22 specifically states that Adventists will refrain from eating unclean meats. This is not a choice this is fundamental belief of Adventism as stated in its doctrines. Vegetarianism is however a choice.

As you will see from Mark 7, the SDA prohibition on unclean foods is in direct contradiction to scripture.

Brandon
Interpretation is always different to different religious groups. I concede the point about choice. I looked it up and it is a belief. But IT IS A BELIEF, just like anything. I never claimed to be a theology major or anything. There were people who were postulating that Adventists say Catholics arent Christian. I had to answer that. I did not open this thread to discuss the intricasies of doctrine. Just to lay to rest some general negative beliefs. Many people have come and said that they know that we dont hate you. And you should know that! There is no hate. Do you think people delight in naming the beast and the whore no matter which denomination it is? It is done sadly and with much prayer. I’m sorry you had a negative expereience.
 
40.png
sadie2723:
I like your style! I wish more people followed it. We should all be out to learn as much as we can without trying to kill each other.
Thank you. I appreciate that! Especially right now! 🙂 I just wanted to tell people that there is no judgement placed upon Catholics from my denomination. There is the same old protestant view of the problem with the pope and his authority, but as Christians, we actually have a great deal more in common than not.
 
Catholic Dude:
So from the year 100AD to 1700AD there was nobody who was preaching an undefiled Christian gospel? and even at 1700 wasnt enough, the millerite and then SDAs, that means it really came around during the 1800’s.

Does this sound correct to you? The year is 2006 lets minus 1800 years which leaves about 206 years (10% of Christian history) out of all this time that people figured out what the truth was.

Do you belive Jesus founded a Church that suddenly failed and it took 1700 years for people to find the truth? Some people would claim the Bible is clear enough for anyone to read and understand, yet why did not one person read and understand the “clear” teachings all these years?

Remember Constantine wasnt around till about 300AD that means from 100AD to 275AD according to you nobody was preaching the correct Christian message.
Even the Jews in Jesus’ time werent doing it right according to Jesus himself. Adventists studied the Bible, found the main beliefs held today, and put them into practice. Is that something we should be called a cult for? To be guided by the HS and our conscious rather than whats popular? Why dont we take all of this info and direct it at lost souls, athiests, etc. Instead of the IM RIGHT and YOUR WRONG onslaught? Dont you agree?
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
Even the Jews in Jesus’ time werent doing it right according to Jesus himself. Adventists studied the Bible, found the main beliefs held today, and put them into practice. Is that something we should be called a cult for? To be guided by the HS and our conscious rather than whats popular? Why dont we take all of this info and direct it at lost souls, athiests, etc. Instead of the IM RIGHT and YOUR WRONG onslaught? Dont you agree?
There were Jews doing it right and Jesus openly praises them (for example those who recognized Him and followed him), however there were also ones who rejected Him and He showed them who was boss.

The OT is actually very clear that God never eliminated the Jews but rather always kept a remnant of people who obeyed Him. Can you say the same? For over 1700 years not one Christian knew of the correct Gospel? If what you say is true then God essentially turned His back on the world for 1700 years and refused to allow all those poor people to find the way the truth and the life.
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
Even the Jews in Jesus’ time werent doing it right according to Jesus himself. Adventists studied the Bible, found the main beliefs held today, and put them into practice. Is that something we should be called a cult for? To be guided by the HS and our conscious rather than whats popular? Why dont we take all of this info and direct it at lost souls, athiests, etc. Instead of the IM RIGHT and YOUR WRONG onslaught? Dont you agree?
SDAGirl,
Catholicism recognizes the validity of the SDA baptism, which means we consider Adventist’s to be Christian, not a cult. However, SDA’s do have many cultish characteristics, which I did not fully realize until I left Catholicism. My wife and I were born and raised SDA and very active.

You hit the nail on the head when you said SDA’s studied the Bible and came to your understanding of Christianity. This is what seperates Catholics from SDA’s, we took our teachings directly from Christ and his Apostles and later determined the cannon of the Bible. The Bible was an outgrowth of the Catholic Church, whereas the SDA Church is an outgrowth of one interpretation of the Bible.

Christ did not establish a cannon he established a church on earth.

I find it humourous that you say we shouldnt do the who is right and wrong thing… on one hand I agree, on the other, I think that the debate and discussion is healthy, Christ himself told us to evangelize the world, and spread truth. This is something we should do, but it should not stop us from working together on items of unity!

Brandon
 
40.png
SDA2RC:
SDAGirl,
Catholicism recognizes the validity of the SDA baptism, which means we consider Adventist’s to be Christian, not a cult. However, SDA’s do have many cultish characteristics, which I did not fully realize until I left Catholicism. My wife and I were born and raised SDA and very active.

You hit the nail on the head when you said SDA’s studied the Bible and came to your understanding of Christianity. This is what seperates Catholics from SDA’s, we took our teachings directly from Christ and his Apostles and later determined the cannon of the Bible. The Bible was an outgrowth of the Catholic Church, whereas the SDA Church is an outgrowth of one interpretation of the Bible.

Christ did not establish a cannon he established a church on earth.

I find it humourous that you say we shouldnt do the who is right and wrong thing… on one hand I agree, on the other, I think that the debate and discussion is healthy, Christ himself told us to evangelize the world, and spread truth. This is something we should do, but it should not stop us from working together on items of unity!

Brandon
I am starting to realize that a certain amount of dialogue is good but people have a hard time accepting differenced without the YOUR WRONG attitude. I have Never Once in ANY post said that any Catholic viewpoint is wrong. Do you know how many times I have been told? countless. I understand I am like a flea on the back of your site, but I just had to address some misconceptions about our feelings toward the world. If nothing else, I hope you know that there is at least one Adventist who does not judge, dislike, hate, or have any negative feelings whatsoever towards you or any person. I’m sorry, but I have to take offense to alot of these postings in which we are accused of not being christian but a cult, not believing in the trinity, praying to ellen white instead of god, etc. Just as you take offense to the anti-christ stance. I was hoping that we could speak on loving and accepting terms. I am not here to convert anyone. I think all would agree we have enough differences to take up alot of space, but I didnt want MORE differences that were untrue to be circulated. I was just trying to help you know that you are not hated no matter what anyone says. Thats all. I hope it got thru.
 
I’m sorry, but I have to take offense to alot of these postings in which we are accused of not being christian but a cult, not believing in the trinity, praying to ellen white instead of god, etc.
I don’t recall anyone saying that Adventists weren’t Christians, or that you don’t believe in the Trinity, or that you pray to E. G. White instead of God, etc. I do think that most of us are more informed on SDAism than that.

However, there were valid questions brought up as to E. G. White’s status as “prophetess” or that she was in any way inspired by the Holy Spirit and that the Trinity is consistent with the Bible but you (and all protestants) clearly took its deeper meaning from the definitions of the Councils of the Catholic Church.
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
I am starting to realize that a certain amount of
dialogue is good but people have a hard time accepting differenced without the YOUR WRONG attitude…
SDAGirl, the very premise of your religion is that you are part of the remnant and that all others are following less than the fullness of the truth. You may not want to directly tell people they are wrong, but your very assertion of a different doctrine infers that the other is wrong.
40.png
SDAgirl:
I have Never Once in ANY post said that any Catholic viewpoint is wrong…
Why not? Do you believe we are right?
40.png
SDAgirl:
Do you know how many times I have been told? countless…
Why do you think that is?
40.png
SDAgirl:
I understand I am like a flea on the back of your site, but I just had to address some misconceptions about our feelings toward the world. If nothing else, I hope you know that there is at least one Adventist who does not judge, dislike, hate, or have any negative feelings whatsoever towards you or any person. …
You seem very sweet, and you are always welcome on the site, but it is unreasonable not to expect to be told you are wrong.
40.png
SDAgirl:
I’m sorry, but I have to take offense to alot of these postings in which we are accused of not being christian but a cult, not believing in the trinity, praying to ellen white instead of god, etc…
I have never heard of praying to ellen white… thats a new one to me… LOL But it is true that Adventism did not believe in the Trinity when it was first organized and up until the middle 1950’s, this denial of the basic belief in the Trinity took Adventism outside the pale of Christianity. Since the early 1900’s Adventism has gradually accepted the Trinity and changed their beliefs, and have accepted the Catholic doctrine of God. You can verify this in the SDA published book Issues and other papers written by SDA scholars and historians. So you can see why some people have not come around to understand that the SDA Church is now following a Christian doctrine of God?

Brandon
 
But it is true that Adventism did not believe in the Trinity when it was first organized
That is true, and thus the Church would have regarded SDAs as non-Christian had they held on to that belief. Belief in the Trinity is essential for the basis of Christianity.

That is why, strictly speaking, JWs and Mormons aren’t Christian-they don’t believe in the Trinity and if they say they do, it is not the same way that we understand the Trinity as.
 
40.png
SDA2RC:
SDAGirl, the very premise of your religion is that you are part of the remnant and that all others are following less than the fullness of the truth. You may not want to directly tell people they are wrong, but your very assertion of a different doctrine infers that the other is wrong.
:confused: In the interests of diplomacy, should one tell another that they are wrong when we are supposed to be brothers and sisters in Jesus?

Why not? Do you believe we are right?
:confused: No, because I would never tell someone that they are wrong because their ideas do not match up with mine. This is something I have sadly experienced here. :

Why do you think that is?
:confused: I’m not sure but it saddens me that all I wanted to do was talk about the ways that Adventism was misrepresented just as you do, but in a nonaccusatory way. :

You seem very sweet, and you are always welcome on the site, but it is unreasonable not to expect to be told you are wrong.
:confused: And why is that? Is this not maybe why Protestants left. Because anything other than what you believe is wrong? :

I have never heard of praying to ellen white… thats a new one to me… LOL But it is true that Adventism did not believe in the Trinity when it was first organized and up until the middle 1950’s, this denial of the basic belief in the Trinity took Adventism outside the pale of Christianity
:confused: This statement is untrue. Our religion has always accepted the Trinity. I’m not sure where this rumor started, but it is not accurate. :

. Since the early 1900’s Adventism has gradually accepted the Trinity and changed their beliefs, and have accepted the Catholic doctrine of God. You can verify this in the SDA published book Issues and other papers written by SDA scholars and historians. So you can see why some people have not come around to understand that the SDA Church is now following a Christian doctrine of God?
:confused: see statement above. I thank those that were courteous in their comments. I will maybe try to come again later when maybe the company is a little less accusatory. You have succeeded. The Adventist will go away now. Sorry to any that thought I was trying to convert anyone. Just wanted some friendly dialogue between fellow beievers in Jesus. Sorry for the intrusion. :
 
In the interests of diplomacy, should one tell another that they are wrong when we are supposed to be brothers and sisters in Jesus?
We don’t need to try to street preacher’s “y’all are goin’ to HELL!” tactics certainly, but the Faith demands that we must give witness to the Truth of the Faith. The Faith cannot just say “I’m OK and you’re OK”-Truth is Truth.
No, because I would never tell someone that they are wrong because their ideas do not match up with mine. This is something I have sadly experienced here. :
Do you believe in objective truth?
And why is that? Is this not maybe why Protestants left. Because anything other than what you believe is wrong?
There is one Christ, one Church, one Doctrine, one Faith. They left because their pride and error would not let them submit in obedience to their legitimate superiors. If there is not a True Faith, how can we ever know if anything is right?
This statement is untrue. Our religion has always accepted the Trinity. I’m not sure where this rumor started, but it is not accurate. :
It started with your own church-

sdanet.org/atissue/trinity/index.htm
 
40.png
SDAgirl:
This statement refers to Jesus being independent of HUMANITY not of the Godhead.
The passage is clearly saying Jesus can not be everywhere at once and thus the Holy Spirit has to do it for him thus Ellen White is denying that Jesus is omnipresent. Since, all three members of the trinity are co-equal Jesus in and of himself would be omnipresent without the Holy Spirit doing it for him. Read the whole passage.

“Cumbered with humanity, Christ could not be in every place personally; therefore it was altogether for their advantage that He should leave them, go to His father, and send the Holy Spirit to be His successor on earth. The Holy Spirit is Himself divested of the personality of humanity and independent thereof. **He would represent Himself as present in all places by His Holy Spirit, as the Omnipresent.” ** (Manuscript Releases Volume Fourteen, page 23, paragraph 3)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top