P
Path_Finder
Guest
There have long been Hispanic parishes and Dioceses with heavy Hispanic populations.
When Christ preached the Eucharist, and the multitude abandoned him, he didn’t say to the Apostles and those that stayed, "Okay we need to change strategies, and attitudes toward those who didnt want to hear me say 'Unless you Eat my Flesh. ’ "
Exactly.The Church was never about sustaining numbers for the sake of numbers!
While this is true, and it’s important to note that, the cultures and subcultures so formed under the guise of vernacular IMO exceeded the realm of the unity of Latin, Gregorian chant, organ, etc. which were also called for in SC.Vatican II called for this. Yes, some things have been taken too far liturgically but slowly that is lessening. While keeping the elements of the Mass and Sacraments solid there is certainly room for cultural expression.
So I guess we could use EWTN’s mass as an example as what some might imagine as a better fulfillment of the VII liturgical calling. Where is the room for cultural difference in that kind of Mass?While this is true, and it’s important to note that, the cultures and subcultures so formed under the guise of vernacular IMO exceeded the realm of the unity of Latin, Gregorian chant, organ, etc. which were also called for in SC.
Unfortunately, I see only further divides.
The cultural differences used to be noted by the language of the sermon/homily, the bulletins, a few hymns, and perhaps the handmissals. We’ve simply drifted from any commonness we had, such as Latin in the Mass itself, etc. Even the rubrics are different, as each country has its own translation of the IGMR/GRIM itself. Where would the Latino go is a good question. But then where would the Anglophone go if things went all Hispanic? Thirty years from now, that’s a real possibility. The percentage of below-30 crowd who attend Mass is about 5% and the number of Spanish bishops has already far exceeded the English-speaking ones.So I guess we could use EWTN’s mass as an example as what some might imagine as a better fulfillment of the VII liturgical calling. Where is the room for cultural difference in that kind of Mass?
If the OF Mass has Gregorian Chant, latin responses, and traditional english music- where would the “Latino” go?
I’m not saying I don’t like a latin/english mass. I do. But I am a Caucasian who doesn’t speak Spanish and has not sense of Latino culture- so of course I would feel at home with a more “euro-centric” expression of faith.
This makes no sense, and I hold such ideas suspect.
***In general the key to the future of any countries following of the Faith, is a responsibility of all the Churches members. *** No one group will hold the key answer or solution to problem areas. Secularism is a general condition that we must all become more aware of. It is easy to fall into. The new practices of social marketing on TV and through social media is a major weapon against the Faith.
Christians in general need to know their Bible better, live accordingly with more vigor, and resist things like materialism, or becoming mediocre about issues of birth control, abortion, and sin in general. True conversion is the key to a strong Church in the future. Not any particular ethnic group or new age convention on morality.
Thanks for the kind words,Veridical16: You have got this so right and said what I was trying to get at in my own post, but much better. I think there has been a lost sense of what Catholic means and thus what our Faith requires of us. We are to be Catholic above all else, including our race, ethnicity and cultural experience. But people don’t seem to get that, and even the Church can dabble too much in trying to be “politically correct” in order to gain numbers.
I have often told family, friends and associates that I would just as soon have a Church with 1000 solid believers than one filled with 10 thousand folks who barely lived according to our faith if at all. Numbers mean nothing. Commitment to the truth, and living by that truth does. We should not have to go around fretting about demographics and tactics to bring people to the Church or keep them there. These things are a distraction from what really needs to be going on, and the real changes that need to occur.
Thanks for your perspective. It is the best one here.
Yes, but let’s heed St John XXIII’s warning on this.In general the key to the future of any countries following of the Faith, is a responsibility of all the Churches members. No one group will hold the key answer or solution to problem areas.
fshcm.com/wisdom.htmlIf the Church were to hand down catholic teaching using some or many changeable and recent languages, non of which has any authority over the others, clearly it follows, considering their variety, that it couldn’t be enforced with any significant clarity to make it obvious to all, nor would there be a common and stable norm to which all other meanings would have to be subjected.
I wonder how many “Anglos” have left the Church because of what they might perceive as the Hierarchy’s obvious bias toward the Hispanic population?Latino Catholics have a right to have their cultural heritages respected and celebrated in sacramental worship.
Catholics of all groups in the US aren’t called to “melt” into the american church experience we have as that may not be what they are comfortable with.
If we aren’t taking about the EF (basically western-European and renaissance/baroque in style)- then there is room, and the Church has called for, embracing of cultural identity in our worship.
Vatican II called for this. Yes, some things have been taken too far liturgically but slowly that is lessening. While keeping the elements of the Mass and Sacraments solid there is certainly room for cultural expression.
And gaining members is GREAT for the Church. It is an Orthodox idea to keep a small and elite church. The Catholic Church always tries for more adherents.
There aren’t good Catholics and bad Catholics- there are just Catholics- and we are all on a faith journey. Thing is, you can’t even START that journey if folks aren’t receiving the sacraments.
Yes, so present faith matters in a way to attract Latinos and help them express their cultural identity in their worship. Are some of you just saying that “they should just worship how we do.” That’s not fair and it shows a basic lack of respect for cultural identity.
I listened some to the Jason Lewis radio show tonight, he was saying something similar which is interesting. Lewis was saying that he wondered if there was a care about Americans in saying these things.I wonder how many “Anglos” have left the Church because of what they might perceive as the Hierarchy’s obvious bias toward the Hispanic population?
I would dare say that to some of us, it has gotten to the point that it seems that all that matters to the Church is to change immigration law so that illegal alien Mexicans become legal…changing not only the demographics of the Church in the United States, but the demographics of the nation itself…and changing the political and cultural landscape as well, not only for the Hispanic population, but for all of us…
Sometimes, to me, it seems that the Church has made the decision that it is willing to sacrifice the future of the “Anglo” population for the future of the Hispanic…if so, it may well be axiomatic that the future of the Church in America rests with the Hispanic population…
I don’t think the leavers will find too much comfort in Protestant churches either who are trying to attract immigrants as well.I wonder how many “Anglos” have left the Church because of what they might perceive as the Hierarchy’s obvious bias toward the Hispanic population?
To the extent that the Church is serving the oppressed and disadvantaged, it is serving the Mission of God to which we are all called to be witnesses and participants. We participate by loving our neighbor, new neighbors included, whether they be Anglo or Hispanic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African or Eastern European descent. The Church is Universal, the message of the Gospel is Universal and we ought to welcome all to the faith. To the extent that we argue with the Church that Christ established we divide the body of Christ.I wonder how many “Anglos” have left the Church because of what they might perceive as the Hierarchy’s obvious bias toward the Hispanic population?
I would dare say that to some of us, it has gotten to the point that it seems that all that matters to the Church is to change immigration law so that illegal alien Mexicans become legal…changing not only the demographics of the Church in the United States, but the demographics of the nation itself…and changing the political and cultural landscape as well, not only for the Hispanic population, but for all of us…
Sometimes, to me, it seems that the Church has made the decision that it is willing to sacrifice the future of the “Anglo” population for the future of the Hispanic…if so, it may well be axiomatic that the future of the Church in America rests with the Hispanic population…
I can testify as to the reality of this. Our former parish which we left several months ago, has a registration of about 700 families. Of that number approximately 40-50 persons speak little or no English. In the past two years, the pastor has provided them with a Spanish Mass (I have no problem with that although there are 2 parishes in town already which are more geared toward their culture.) They have now been given their own celebrations and special feast days which are exclusively Spanish. This too, is okay, but how is the majority supposed to reach out their hand across the aisle to befriend them when no attempt is made by the minority to join in the larger community? They continue to be segregated because of language. It has also been discovered that the food collection within the parish and many other resources which used to go to the general populace of the poor, are now being directed exclusively to this small number. Does this not somehow offend the common good which is a primary principle of social justice teaching? And donations are being directed to help the cause of immigration “reform.” The bishop actually stopped some of this when it was disclosed that a Coalition was secretly channeling money to fund professional lobbyists to advocate for SS marriage. And when the diocese gave financial disclosure a couple of years ago, 48% had been given to Hispanic ministries (I still to this day am not certain what those are.) The entire thing is becoming crazy because instead of charitably helping **all **the poor, it has somehow turned into a bizarre political movement.I would dare say that to some of us, it has gotten to the point that it seems that all that matters to the Church is to change immigration law so that illegal alien Mexicans become legal…changing not only the demographics of the Church in the United States, but the demographics of the nation itself…and changing the political and cultural landscape as well, not only for the Hispanic population, but for all of us…
Sometimes, to me, it seems that the Church has made the decision that it is willing to sacrifice the future of the “Anglo” population for the future of the Hispanic…if so, it may well be axiomatic that the future of the Church in America rests with the Hispanic population…
Even amongst those who do speak a passable amount of English, they prefer their own Spanish language and community. In my area, we also have the Polish community but they were given their own mission church. People are naturally inclined to their own native tongue and are naturally hostile towards anyone who tells them they shouldn’t be. Nothing wrong for Anglos to learn a few Spanish words like “Gracias” and “La Paz” and occasionally join in at a Spanish Mass. The ideal thing would be to celebrate Mass in a common worship tongue but it seems unrealistic to do it for everyone given the current vernacular and deeply-divided environment.I can testify as to the reality of this. Our former parish which we left several months ago, has a registration of about 700 families. Of that number approximately 40-50 persons speak little or no English. In the past two years, the pastor has provided them with a Spanish Mass (I have no problem with that although there are 2 parishes in town already which are more geared toward their culture.) They have now been given their own celebrations and special feast days which are exclusively Spanish. This too, is okay, but how is the majority supposed to reach out their hand across the aisle to befriend them when no attempt is made by the minority to join in the larger community? They continue to be segregated because of language.
I happen to believe in the Catholic Church and the efficacy of the Sacraments. Getting people to Mass and receiving the grace there, getting the numbers up so to speak, is the way to take them off the path to perdition.What good are having numbers sustained in America, if the number of souls are still on a road to perdition?