"Be ye baptized, for the remission of your sins"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matariel
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Matariel

Guest
Ok. I would like a answer from Protestants (at least the ones who don’t believe in Baptismal Regeneration) for each verse of why Baptism isn’t regenerative or what is pivotal in being born again.:

John 3:3,5 - Jesus says, “**Truly, truly, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, **he cannot enter the kingdom of God.” When Jesus said “water and the Spirit,” He was referring to baptism (which is the use of water and the power of the Spirit).

John 3:22 - after teaching on baptism, John says Jesus and the disciples did what? They went into Judea where the disciples baptized. Jesus’ teaching about being reborn by water and the Spirit is in the context of baptism.

John 4:1 - here is another reference to baptism which naturally flows from Jesus’ baptismal teaching in John 3:3-5.

Acts 22:16 – Ananias tells Saul, “arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins.” The “washing away”, odviously, refers to water baptism.

Titus 3:5-6 – Paul writes about the “washing of regeneration,” which is “poured out on us” in reference to water baptism. “Washing” (loutron) generally refers to a ritual washing.

Heb. 10:22 – the author is also writing about water baptism in this verse. “Having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.” Our bodies are washed with pure water in water baptism.

2 Kings 5:14 - Naaman dipped himself seven times in the Jordan, and his flesh was restored like that of a child. This foreshadows the regenerative function of baptism, by water and the Holy Spirit.

Isaiah 44:3 - the Lord pours out His water and His Spirit. Water and the Spirit are linked to baptism. The Bible never separates them.

Ezek. 36:25-27 - the Lord promises He will sprinkle us with water to cleanse us from sin and give us a new heart and spirit. Paul refers to this verse in Heb. 10:22. The teaching of Ezekiel foreshadows the salvific nature of Christian baptism instituted by Jesus and taught in John 3:5, Titus 3:5, 1 Peter 3:21 and Acts 22:16.

Matt. 28:19-20 - Jesus commands the apostles to baptize all people “in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” Many Protestant churches are now teaching that baptism is only a symbolic ritual, and not what actually cleanses us from original sin. This belief contradicts Scripture and the 2,000 year-old teaching of the Church.

Acts 2:38 - Peter commands them to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ in order to be actually forgiven of sin, not just to partake of a symbolic ritual.

Matt. 28:19-20; Acts 2:38 - there is nothing in these passages or elsewhere in the Bible **about baptism being symbolic. There is also nothing about just accepting Jesus as personal Lord and Savior **in order to be saved.

Mark 16:16 - **Jesus said “He who believes AND is baptized will be saved.” **Jesus says believing is not enough. Baptism is also required. This is because baptism is salvific, not just symbolic. The Greek text also does not mandate any specific order for belief and baptism, so the verse proves nothing about a “believer’s baptism.”

John 3:3,5 - unless we are “born again” of water and Spirit in baptism, we cannot enter into the kingdom of God. The Greek word for the phrase “born again” is “anothen” which literally means “begotten from above.” See, for example, John 3:31 where “anothen” is so used. Baptism brings about salvation, not just a symbolism of our salvation.

Acts 8:12-13; 36; 10:47 - if belief is all one needs to be saved, why is everyone instantly baptized after learning of Jesus?

Acts 16:15; 31-33; 18:8; 19:2,5 - these texts present more examples of people learning of Jesus, and then immediately being baptized. If accepting Jesus as personal Lord and Savior is all one needs to do to be saved, then why does everyone in the early Church immediately seek baptism?

Acts 9:18 - Paul, even though he was directly chosen by Christ and immediately converted to Christianity, still had to be baptized to be forgiven his sin. This is a powerful text which demonstrates the salvific efficacy of water baptism, even for those who decide to give their lives to Christ.

Acts 22:16 - Ananias tells Paul, “arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins,” even though Paul was converted directly by Jesus Christ. This proves that Paul’s acceptance of Jesus as personal Lord and Savior was not enough to be forgiven of his sin and saved. The sacrament of baptism is required.

Acts 22:16 - further, Ananias’ phrase “wash away” comes from the Greek word “apolouo.” “Apolouo” means an actual cleansing which removes sin. It is not a symbolic covering up of sin. Even though Jesus chose Paul directly in a heavenly revelation, Paul had to be baptized to have his sins washed away.

Rom. 6:4 - in baptism, we actually die with Christ so that we, like Him, might be raised to newness of life. This means that, by virtue of our baptism, our sufferings are not in vain. They are joined to Christ and become efficacious for our salvation.

1 Cor. 6:11 - Paul says they were **washed, sanctified, and justified **in the name of the Lord Jesus, in reference to baptism. The “washing” of baptism gives birth to sanctification and justification, which proves baptism is not just symbolic.

Gal. 3:27 - whoever is baptized in Christ puts on Christ. Putting on Christ is not just symbolic. Christ actually dwells within our soul.

Col. 2:12 - in baptism, we literally die with Christ and are raised with Christ. It is a supernatural reality, not just a symbolic ritual. The Scriptures never refer to baptism as symbolic.

Titus 3:5-7 – “He saved us by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit, which He poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ, so that we might be justified by His grace and become heirs of eternal life.” This is a powerful text which proves that baptism regenerates our souls and is thus salvific. The “washing of regeneration” “saves us.” Regeneration is never symbolic, and the phrase “saved us” refers to salvation. By baptism, we become justified by His grace (interior change) and heirs of eternal life (filial adoption). Because this refers to baptism, the verse is about the beginning of the life in Christ. No righteous deeds done before baptism could save us. Righteous deeds after baptism are necessary for our salvation.

There is also a definite parallel between John 3:5 and Titus 3:5: (1) John 3:5 – enter the kingdom of God / Titus 3:5 – He saved us. (2) John 3:5 – born of water / Titus 3:5 – washing. (3) John 3:5 – born of the Spirit / Titus 3:5 – renewal in the Spirit.

Heb. 10:22 - in baptism, our hearts are **sprinkled clean from an evil conscience **(again, dealing with the interior of the person) as our bodies are washed with pure water (the waters of baptism). Baptism regenerates us because it removes original sin, sanctifies our souls, and effects our adoption as sons and daughters in Jesus Christ.

Could I have an answer for each verse in order please? I’m wondering what Protestants (who don’t believe in Baptismal Regeneration) think of this.
 
Isn’t it amazing how the Lord works. I was just reading a book titled 'Believer’s Baptism, Sign of the New Covenant in Christ" by Thomas Schreiner and Shawn Wright.
They dealt with every one of those verses and very Biblicily proved their point… We are not saved by baptism.
 
Isn’t it amazing how the Lord works. I was just reading a book titled 'Believer’s Baptism, Sign of the New Covenant in Christ" by Thomas Schreiner and Shawn Wright.
They dealt with every one of those verses and very Biblicily proved their point… We are not saved by baptism.
Well it sounds like you are perfectly prepared! Please share! 👍
 
Isn’t it amazing how the Lord works. I was just reading a book titled 'Believer’s Baptism, Sign of the New Covenant in Christ" by Thomas Schreiner and Shawn Wright.
They dealt with every one of those verses and very Biblicily proved their point… We are not saved by baptism.
I have read that book as well; it is extremely well written, but without fully critiquing it, it relies on the same faulty Baptist logic of the sacrament being a work we do, as opposed to being a monergistic work of the Spirit.
 
allischambers says: We are not saved by baptism.

The Word of God says, "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us…" 1 Peter 3:21, KJV

Who’s right: allischambers or St. Peter?**
 
allischambers says: We are not saved by baptism.

The Word of God says, "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us**…" 1 Peter 3:21, KJV

Who’s right: allischambers or St. Peter?
I hope allischambers will explain to us what Peter REALLY meant. 😉
 
The thief on the cross who Christ said would be with him in paradise was not baptized with water.

Also - just as we are not saved by works, but works are evidence of our faith (James), so water baptism does not save us, but we will do it as evidence of our faith (because Christ commanded us to do it).

Another example is the Catholic tradition that babies can be saved without baptism and that even adults who are not baptized with water can be saved if they had a desire and intent to be baptized (thats in the Catechism).

Blessings,

Brian
 
Also - just as we are not saved by works, but works are evidence of our faith (James), so water baptism does not save us, but we will do it as evidence of our faith (because Christ commanded us to do it).
Baptism is not our work. It is the work of God. Again, this is a standard baptistic assumption. We are Baptized in the name of the Triune God. The Triune God saves us, through Baptism.
Another example is the Catholic tradition that babies can be saved without baptism and that even adults who are not baptized with water can be saved if they had a desire and intent to be baptized (thats in the Catechism).
Blessings,
No tradition restricts salvation to Baptism alone. Baptism is one of the means of grace that God uses to give us new life and the remission of sins. It is, however, an ordinary means.
 
allischambers says: We are not saved by baptism.

The Word of God says, "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us**…" 1 Peter 3:21, KJV

Who’s right: allischambers or St. Peter?
1 Peter 3:21 says “This prefigured baptism, which saves you now. It is not a removal of dirt from the body but an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (NAB).

Why does Peter say that baptism saves us? Because it is “an appeal to God for a clear conscience.” This implies three things: 1) the person being baptized is making an appeal to God, and thus must be of sound mind to be able to make such an appeal, 2) the person being baptized must have actually sinned, for otherwise there would be no need for an appeal for a clean conscience, 3) since this appeal is “through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” baptism involves faith in the resurrection of Christ. All three of these point towards believer’s baptism, for baptism saves us on account of the fact that we are appealing to God for a clean conscience through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
 
The thief on the cross who Christ said would be with him in paradise was not baptized with water.

The thief on the cross died confessing Jesus–and this was BEFORE Jesus gave the commandment to be baptized when He ascended into heaven.
 
Why does Peter say that baptism saves us? Because it is “an appeal to God for a clear conscience.” This implies three things:

**In other words, when the Bible says “Baptism doth now save us,” it means, “Baptism doth NOT save us.”

Is this what you’re saying?

Sounds to me like you’re trying to make the Word of God of none effect by your tradition–something Jesus Himself condemned.**
 
Why does Peter say that baptism saves us? Because it is “an appeal to God for a clear conscience.” This implies three things:

**In other words, when the Bible says “Baptism doth now save us,” it means, “Baptism doth NOT save us.”

Is this what you’re saying?

Sounds to me like you’re trying to make the Word of God of none effect by your tradition–something Jesus Himself condemned.**
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying it doesn’t save us in the way YOU think it does.
 
Baptism is not our work. It is the work of God. Again, this is a standard baptistic assumption. We are Baptized in the name of the Triune God. The Triune God saves us, through Baptism.

No tradition restricts salvation to Baptism alone. Baptism is one of the means of grace that God uses to give us new life and the remission of sins. It is, however, an ordinary means.
I believe the Catechism clearly states that salvation is possible, as I noted in my post, for those who were not baptized with an intent and desire to have been baptized and that babies, pre-baptism, may also be saved.

Blessings,

Brian
 
I’m saying it doesn’t save us in the way YOU think it does.

I dare you to tell me what I think it does, since you know so much.
 
I believe the Catechism clearly states that salvation is possible, as I noted in my post, for those who were not baptized with an intent and desire to have been baptized and that babies, pre-baptism, may also be saved.

Blessings,

Brian
Infants prior to Baptism can be saved; but without Baptism, we have no objective reason to think they will be.
 
The thief on the cross who Christ said would be with him in paradise was not baptized with water.
We don’t know that. He may have had the baptism of John, or been baptized by one of the Apostles.

However, if a person makes a profession of faith, such as he did, and cannot physically baptized, but wishes to be, they are exempt. In this man’s case, he had what the fathers called “baptism of blood”. He died with the name of Christ his savior on his lips.
Also - just as we are not saved by works, but works are evidence of our faith (James), so water baptism does not save us, but we will do it as evidence of our faith (because Christ commanded us to do it).
Why do you suppose the Bible says that baptism saves?

Why do you suppose all the Apostles misunderstood Christ?
Another example is the Catholic tradition that babies can be saved without baptism and that even adults who are not baptized with water can be saved if they had a desire and intent to be baptized (thats in the Catechism).

Blessings,

Brian
God can save whoever He wants, however He desires. However, He instructed us to be baptized for the remission of sins, so we follow that instruction. 👍
 
I’m saying it doesn’t save us in the way YOU think it does.

I dare you to tell me what I think it does, since you know so much.
Well, you seem to say that it saves us by literally washing our soul clean of sin, whether original or actual sin. Yes or no?
 
I believe the Catechism clearly states that salvation is possible, as I noted in my post, for those who were not baptized with an intent and desire to have been baptized and that babies, pre-baptism, may also be saved.

Blessings,

Brian
Yes, I agree, but as TruineUnity has stated, these are not considered normative. The normal means of becoming a member of the Body of Christ is baptism. There are other extraordinary means.👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top