Dear Malphono,
Bugnini -------Oh yes the old conspiracy theory regarding the new liturgy. Lets get this straight… are you of the party that claims that Bugnini was influenced by the Masons or the party that blames the protestants ? Well regardless both “theories” holds as much water as a bucket without a bottom.
I would recommend that you read, “The Shape of the Liturgy” by Gregory Dix published in 1947 and take a run through the Didache to get a better handle of the subject of the Liturgy.
Br Mark, OSB
No, I am not of the Masonic conspiracy school, nor do I give a hoot about Protestants. I am of the school that says Bugnini and company were (and are, since they are alive and unfortunately well)
liturgical butchers who were/are in opposition to what PP Benedict XVI has termed the hermeneutic of continuity.
Further, for you information, I quite well understand liturgy, and the theology of the Eucharist. More so than you will ever know. According to your misrepresentation, the
ad orientem position in and of itself would “interfere with the faithful clear view of what takes place at the altar” and that, my friend, is a lot of hooey.
Ah yes, I have been exposed: horror of horrors, I am of the
ad orientem school, and may I add, very proudly so. And no, I am
not a fan of the Novus Ordo (for a variety of reasons that I will not go into in this forum), but that has little bearing: even the rubrics of the Novus Ordo presume
ad orientem.
Reduced to its simplest form, the “Benedictine Arrangement” is a “bridge” between the true
ad orientem posture and what is commonly called
versus populum. When the the “Benedictine Arrangement” is used in a
versus populum celebration, the focus for both the celebrant and the congregation is the Crucifix. Somewhat similar to the actual use of
ad orientem. In any case, to say that candlesticks and a Crucifix “interfere” with anything is just bizarre. I would hardly presume a Crucifix to be “out of place” during Holy Mass.