Benedictine Oblate #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luigi_Daniele
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you all.

He is such a holy, holy man. I think that he is a saint.
 
Luigi_Daniele said:
Thank you all.

He is such a holy, holy man. I think that he is a saint.
Click to expand...
Its sometimes surprising to me how many saints there really are in the world. Most of them do not get recognized as such, but they are nonetheless. Makes me realize how dreadfully far I have to go.

Peace,
 
jwinch2 said:
Its sometimes surprising to me how many saints there really are in the world. Most of them do not get recognized as such, but they are nonetheless. Makes me realize how dreadfully far I have to go.

Peace,
Click to expand...
Me, too.

HIM.

Me (and I’m being charitable to myself)
 
Luigi_Daniele said:
Anyone familiar with this book? I would really appreciate a review.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/412TDUGO39L.SL500_AA300.jpg
Click to expand...
Thomas MERTON, The Rule of Saint Benedict. Initiation into the Monastic Tradition 4. Edited with an introduction by Patrick F. O’Connell. Collegeville, MN: Cisterican Publications, 2009. pp. 291. $24.95 pb. ISBN 978-0-8790-7019-9.
Reviewed by Daniel ROBER, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458

Thomas Merton was many things to many people – poet, political activist, spiritual writer, pioneer in inter-religious dialogue. At the core, however, he was defined by his vocation as a Trappist monk living in Gethsemani monastery in Kentucky. As part of this vocation, he spent time serving as novice master, instructing the young monks in the ways of Trappist life and the Rule of Saint Benedict which they followed. The present volume, the fourth Merton installment in Cistercian’s Monastic Wisdom Series, presents his novice conferences on the Rule, given during the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, culled from the notes Merton used to give them.

Merton arranges the conferences in three parts – an introduction to the Rule, a discussion of St. Benedict, and a commentary on the Rule. Interestingly, as he notes early on, Merton chooses to leave out discussion of the Divine Office (one might assume this was covered at some other juncture in the novitiate), likely to disappoint those who appreciate Merton’s insights on liturgy and prayer (6). The overall style of the conferences is somewhat fragmentary and choppy, understandable given the context of their presentation as a guide meant to illuminate the Rule, working knowledge of which is presumed throughout. This does not mean, however, that Merton’s conferences lack insights for the layperson except as curiosities for the Merton completist.

Given as they are for monks, Merton’s conferences here do not take up directly his themes of living the Christian faith in the modern world or finding a place for prayer and contemplation in everyday life. They are, naturally, a guide for monks to the life that they have taken up in the monastery. Yet there are insights throughout the work that can be taken up by those outside the monastery, notably Merton’s warnings against rigidity in the interpretation of the Rule (46). Also notable is Merton’s discussion of the need to honor a person both by interior charity and in just action and respect for the person’s rights (110). One can legitimately find here a foundation for Merton’s later writings on social justice, which would begin shortly after the time when these conferences were given.

As Patrick O’Connell helpfully points out in his Introduction, the main theme of the conferences given by Merton, especially in the last parts, is the humility that is necessary to live out the life of discipleship (xlv). Merton himself acknowledges that the whole work is fundamentally a prelude to the discussion of the “Degrees of Humility,” which he calls “the heart of the Benedictine ascesis” (152). Those familiar with Merton’s biography will know that humility was a major spiritual struggle for him, especially in dealing with his superiors, and thus it is quite illuminating to read his insights in this area. He also comes up with some pithy remarks, notably his commentary on what he calls the characteristically American belief that “popularity and love are a justification and seal of approval upon our false idea of ourselves” (169). Again, these conferences can certainly find an audience beyond their initial intended readership.

This edition includes a Preface by Joan Chittister that briefly remarks on the Rule and Merton’s conferences from a Benedictine perspective, highlighting especially the room for flexibility and change provided by the rule. Patrick O’Connell’s Introduction summarizes Merton’s conferences and contextualizes them within Merton’s life as a monk and his oeuvre as a writer. Especially effective is his argument about the unity of Merton’s contemplative and activist writings, which I think bears out from the text. Overall, this edition provides a very helpful resource both for those with an interest in Merton and for scholarly and popular audiences looking for insights into Benedictine spirituality.
 
I hope this gives you a little insight into the book. Maybe you will find it worthwhile, maybe not.
 
Luigi_Daniele said:
I certainly will, Jason.🙂
Click to expand...
It is appears to be one of a series on the Monastic Tradition based off of the teachings of Thomas Merton from when he was Novice Master. I’m putting them into my wish list on Amazon and may pick them up later on down the road. The “Cistercian Publications” website has a write up on them in addition to about 15 other books I would love to get.
 
I’m curious if any of you are on Br. Jerome Leo’s mailing list?

He offers the reading from the Rule each day along with a short commentary. What I particularly like is that he gears it toward Oblates and often talks about how to observe it when you’re not living in a monastery, or how to adapt it for life at home or work.

More info: stmarysmonastery.org/holy_rule_reflections.html
 
SuscipeMeDomine said:
I’m curious if any of you are on Br. Jerome Leo’s mailing list?

He offers the reading from the Rule each day along with a short commentary. What I particularly like is that he gears it toward Oblates and often talks about how to observe it when you’re not living in a monastery, or how to adapt it for life at home or work.

More info: stmarysmonastery.org/holy_rule_reflections.html
Click to expand...
I see him on Facebook all the time and get his updates there. His reflections on the Rule are quite good in my opinion.

Peace,
 
Tampa_Dave said:
Glad I could contribute something other than bad monk jokes.
Click to expand...
We all have our moments. 😛 😃

I’m really glad for you that things seem to be going so well with Opus Dei. I am an admirer of St. Josemaria and have learned a great deal from him, in particular the Scripture commentaries that we discussed earlier, and from the many videos of his which can be found on youtube.

Peace,
 
jwinch2 said:
We all have our moments. 😛 😃

I’m really glad for you that things seem to be going so well with Opus Dei. I am an admirer of St. Josemaria and have learned a great deal from him, in particular the Scripture commentaries that we discussed earlier, and from the many videos of his which can be found on youtube.

Peace,
Click to expand...
Thanks, Jason. Things are going very well. The Opus Dei numerary just signed off on my official request to become an Opus Dei cooperator, which is generally the first step before accepting an Opus Dei vocation as a supernumerary. I fully expect to request admission to Opus Dei as a supernumerary following my retreat to Longlea in December, though many cooperators remain so by choice. Likewise, some supernumeraries revert to cooperator status after years of membership in Opus Dei.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top