J
joe370
Guest
It doesn’t so don’t hold your breath…:stretcher:I am still waiting for one advocate of "scripture being the final authority?
It doesn’t so don’t hold your breath…:stretcher:I am still waiting for one advocate of "scripture being the final authority?
EXACTLY! Precisely it is a bogus premise and holds no validity at all.It doesn’t so don’t hold your breath…:stretcher:
The king james…I am still waiting for one advocate of “scripture being the final authority” tell me what Bible Abraham used for his final authority?
LOL…The king james…![]()
I gotta say(apart from the concept that the refusal to believe in the authority of the Papacy (the man) makes for a less than perfect view of the Godhead, and the refusal to accept the idea that a Church body can speak infallibly insults the Holy Spirit) the whole argument of sola scriptura vs. tradition is bogus from the get go, simply because the Scripture as we know it was derived through tradition to begin with, tradition is the only reason there IS a Scripture to read in the first place as it was handed down orally, not in writing for the first three to four hundred years anyway. What was written was what was traditionally orated so if one throws out tradition, one MUST in all honesty throw out Scripture with it…
Once a person throws out Tradition (Scripture), the ability of the Holy Spirit to work through a mere man (Papacy and Infallibility) remind me again of exactly WHY the person would even attend a church of any denomination on a Sunday? Why not go golfing instead? What’s left?
I gotta say(apart from the concept that the refusal to believe in the authority of the Papacy (the man) makes for a less than perfect view of the Godhead, and the refusal to accept the idea that a Church body can speak infallibly insults the Holy Spirit) the whole argument of sola scriptura vs. tradition is bogus from the get go, simply because the Scripture as we know it was derived through tradition to begin with, tradition is the only reason there IS a Scripture to read in the first place as it was handed down orally, not in writing for the first three to four hundred years anyway. What was written was what was traditionally orated so if one throws out tradition, one MUST in all honesty throw out Scripture with it…
Once a person throws out Tradition (Scripture), the ability of the Holy Spirit to work through a mere man (Papacy and Infallibility) remind me again of exactly WHY the person would even attend a church of any denomination on a Sunday? Why not go golfing instead? What’s left?
What’s with the “Catholic SSPX” on your profile now? Last week you were Lutheran.
Mary,I gotta say(apart from the concept that the refusal to believe in the authority of the Papacy (the man) makes for a less than perfect view of the Godhead, and the refusal to accept the idea that a Church body can speak infallibly insults the Holy Spirit) the whole argument of sola scriptura vs. tradition is bogus from the get go, simply because the Scripture as we know it was derived through tradition to begin with, tradition is the only reason there IS a Scripture to read in the first place as it was handed down orally, not in writing for the first three to four hundred years anyway. What was written was what was traditionally orated so if one throws out tradition, one MUST in all honesty throw out Scripture with it…
Once a person throws out Tradition (Scripture), the ability of the Holy Spirit to work through a mere man (Papacy and Infallibility) remind me again of exactly WHY the person would even attend a church of any denomination on a Sunday? Why not go golfing instead? What’s left?
Bat,
Go old school, or go home. St. Vincent de Paul church in KCMO.Bat,
Ma man…no longer Lutheran…you be Catholic SSPX? Bat say whaaaa?
Bat,Go old school, or go home. St. Vincent de Paul church in KCMO.
God Bless you on your journey!Granted, still have to get through RCIA when it starts up again, I’ll need to get a copy of the CCC, and Catholicism for Dummies…But, what the heck. Why fight the ineveitble?
Bat,Granted, still have to get through RCIA when it starts up again, I’ll need to get a copy of the CCC, and Catholicism for Dummies…But, what the heck. Why fight the ineveitble?
That is a good song: If it’s good enough for old Moses, if it’s good enough for old Moses, it’s good enough for me.Bat,
Why SSPX and not just any old Catholic Church?
I have always like that song…
Give me that old time religion, that old time religion…that old time religion…good enough for me…
This is a very fundamental question, and a question that evanswer I think.
ery Lutheran should think long and hard about, and continue to ask themselves. If we can’t rightfully claim to be a continuation of the Western Church - then we need to immediately stop and look around us.
Good question - in a practical sense, recent dogmas about the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Papal Office don’t effect salvation.Are these continuing to be barriers because you choose to continue to make them barriers?
Hey Mary. That’s pretty much the conclusion that I came to, as a former non-Catholic. Why embrace the holy Bible as the infallible word of God, and then reject its source: Catholic Church authority. It was Jesus’ Catholic Church that was responsible for preserving (hundreds of years before the first Protestant Church) Sacred Scripture, and when it came time to officially defining the holy canon, ( a couple hundred years after the apostolic age) the Catholic Church deferred to Sacred Tradition to determine exactly what should and should not be a part of the holy canon.I gotta say(apart from the concept that the refusal to believe in the authority of the Papacy (the man) makes for a less than perfect view of the Godhead, and the refusal to accept the idea that a Church body can speak infallibly insults the Holy Spirit) the whole argument of sola scriptura vs. tradition is bogus from the get go, simply because the Scripture as we know it was derived through tradition to begin with, tradition is the only reason there IS a Scripture to read in the first place as it was handed down orally, not in writing for the first three to four hundred years anyway. What was written was what was traditionally orated so if one throws out tradition, one MUST in all honesty throw out Scripture with it…
Once a person throws out Tradition (Scripture), the ability of the Holy Spirit to work through a mere man (Papacy and Infallibility) remind me again of exactly WHY the person would even attend a church of any denomination on a Sunday? Why not go golfing instead? What’s left?
Good question - in a practical sense, recent dogmas about the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Papal Office don’t effect salvation.
Well…who is to say what effects and what does not effect salvation? The individual or an authoritative entity?
I don’t have any desire to leave the church that has formed my faith, as I don’t see any need whatsoever.