Nonsense. You come together and leave with different faith traditions. No one I encountered was in the business of converting wayward Catholics.
The precise thing a non-denominational bible study endeavors to avoid. I would have been put-off if someone would have attempted to convert me to their Protestant “truth”. Such proselytizing has no place in an ecumenical program of study.
False
Not at all likely. These are uniquely Catholic teachings. BSF does not present itself as a Catholic-oriented study.
Using notated bibles IS discouraged for the simple reason that point of the BSF study is to read, reflect and then discuss your interpretation of the reading, not regurgitate the thoughts of someone else contained in a footnote.
BSF does not forbid or discourage any individual from considering the Bible reading in the context of his/her faith tradition. It does request you do not present your or your denominational interpretation as the
only way to interpret a passage. Consider that this was particularly helpful when Jews and other non-Christians were part of the study and discussion.
This experience has nothing to do with BSF.
If you find yourself offended by a Bible study which is not strictly Catholic in its approach or orientation, then you probably should avoid BSF. “Non-denominational” suggests neither Catholicism or any other creed is preferred over another.
It’s common and accurate to distinguish Catholics from non-Catholic Christians. There are significant differences. Recognizing the existence of difference is not bigotry. Treating people unjustly because of differences is.
No…but pointing out inaccuracy is distinct from belittling.
Defensive?! I’d have to have some skin in the game to work up to defensive. Abusive?!?!?!

Surely you jest.