V
Victoria33
Guest
You made the claim. Any backup? That’s a new one on me.especially considering Pence was pushed on him by the RNC.
You made the claim. Any backup? That’s a new one on me.especially considering Pence was pushed on him by the RNC.
I agree. Tired of Catholics running for office who have quite unCatholic positions…like her running mateProbably better than Tim Kaine was for HC.
Oh, yeah, and she’s all for making it easier for women to kill their unborn babies!Is there a Harris University/ pyramid scheme?
Oh I know! There is a Harris foundation that used donor funds to purchase paintings of her?
Oh I know, the Harris foundation was stripped of the ability to run as a charity?
No?
I know, she has a tape of her bragging that she could grab men and kiss them and grab them?
No, she did her job by inquiring whether a judicial nominee could abide by the Constitution first and his personal religious beliefs second.Kamala Harris attacked a judge nominee for believing in Catholicism. If she is President, our beliefs won’t be welcome.
How DARE you speak of St. Ronnie that way!!!I guess Ronald Reagan is a loser then.
They aren’t now. Remember Wikileaks revelations about the DNC?If she is President, our beliefs won’t be welcome.
Please verify your extreme statement.You mean her past,which is fraught with corruption?
Can you offer a source to support your claim?Because they’re irrelevant. She was picked because she’s a woman of color and that checks two boxes.
There are many qualified people out there and the political effect of a choice is always gauged. Check the veep picks of Lincoln and JFK. Qualifications are certainly not irrelevant and Ms. Harris brings more to the table than being a woman and having dark skin.Because they’re irrelevant. She was picked because she’s a woman of color and that checks two boxes.
I refuse to hijack this thread.How is RR a loser won in a landslide twice.The best president until Trump!