Bill Maher digs up [Senate candidate] O'Donnell 'witchcraft' clip

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beau_Ouiville
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Now, this thing I just found doesn’t qualify as a news story … [neither does a really old Bill Maher clip] … but I thought it demonstrates a side to Christine O’Donnell you don’t see too often. Maybe someone can find a link.

Christine O’Donnell’s Schiavo Case: ‘Life For Lauren’

You know that Christine O’Donnell is pro-life. But one episode that hasn’t gotten much attention is her work on an end-of-life case, reminiscent of Terry Schiavo’s, in 2008.

O’Donnell, the new Republican Senate candidate from Delaware, cites her pro bono public relations work on the case as the reason she was in dire financial straits during her Senate campaign against Joe Biden that year. Her straits were so dire, in fact, she sold her home to her boyfriend and campaign lawyer a month before it was to be auctioned off to pay her mortgage.

“I fell behind on my mortgage. I had a pro bono client that to me was very important. I worked 18 hours a day,” O’Donnell told Sean Hannity this week. “It was a disabled woman who the courts ruled to remove her feeding tube, so it was truly a life or death case. So when her father came to me he said ‘I can’t pay you but will you help me save her life?’ And you can’t say no to that.”

What happened was this, according to local news reports: In 2006, a young woman from Delaware named Lauren Richardson overdosed on heroin and fell into a coma known as a “persistent vegetative state.” She was pregnant, and doctors kept her alive, on a respirator and feeding tube. She gave birth in February 2007.

In early 2008, a judge granted Richardson’s mother, Edith Towers, guardianship. Towers moved to have her daughter’s feeding tube removed, arguing in court that her daughter had told her, “Don’t ever leave me hooked up to life support.” Their conversation had happened, she said, during the Schiavo controversy.

But the girl’s father, Randy Richardson, objected and appealed the judge’s ruling. He said his daughter had never discussed life support with him, and argued that she was responsive. She did not have a living will.

Randy Richardson began a campaign to keep his daughter alive. The Delaware Pro-Life Coalition and the conservative Alliance Defense Fund joined his efforts.

And as O’Donnell said it in a 2008 Delaware radio interview alongside Richardson, she was called and asked to help.

“I was in D.C. when I got a call from people in Delaware saying, ‘Can you help this man get his story out,’” she said, adding that she was working to form an organization called Life for Lauren. “So that’s how I got involved.”

The ADF remembers her efforts.

“Christine was an effective and active advocate involved in communication outreach on behalf of life for Lauren,” the ADF told us in a statement. “The successful fight for Lauren’s life was a combined effort of Lauren’s family, the ADF legal team and many other pro-life Americans who believe life should be protected, not destroyed.”

Richardson set up a web site, held vigils and did press interviews, including one with Hannity and Colmes on Fox News, where O’Donnell had been a pundit.

Eventually, in November 2008, Lauren Richardson’s parents agreed to keep their daughter alive, move her to Randy Richardson’s home in Maryland and take care of her together, according to the Delaware News Journal.

Towers said it was a question posed on Richardson’s web site that helped her change her mind.

“They wrote on one update, ‘What are we going to tell Lauren’s daughter if she asks, “Did you try everything before you gave up?”‘” Towers said.

“What am I going to say?” she said. “No, I honored your mom’s wishes? Or am I going to do the opposite, and try everything in the world?”
 
Think very hard: can you think of any other politicians OR any non-politicians who engaged in that sort of behavior while in college?

[hint: cocaine experimentation ?? ]
Leave George Bush out of this. He said when me was running for office that what he did in college (and his twenties) was irrelevant and behind him and I agreed with him on that.

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd said in the nineties that maybe we need a president who had experimented with drugs in college and the conservatives howled. Then, in 2001 a conservative columnist said that maybe America needed a president who had experimented with drugs in college. Its funny how that view changed.
 
I don’t think that evolution is a myth exactly. On the other hand, there do appear to be missing links in the evolutionary process.
 
I don’t think that evolution is a myth exactly. On the other hand, there do appear to be missing links in the evolutionary process.
Code:
 I don't believe that macro-evolution is a "myth" either. Myths are fictional tales based upon Truths, and macro-evolution is nothing but a hoax, based upon the lie that Man is his own God. 
 Suppose a father pointed to Mt. Rushmore, and exclaimed to his son, "You are witnessing the awesome results of millions of years of erosion, Boy!" Surrounding adults would have to exercise restraint not to call out the man as a crackpot right on the spot! Yet, ... some scientists and other intellectuals point to a spider, hummingbird or butterfly and tell that same kid, "Millions and millions of inexplicable random mutations have produced these curious (organisms) my boy. Trust us!" And these same witnessing adults cower in fear, intimidated by education level of true believers in Darwinism. :blush
 I respect Christine O'Donnell even more today, knowing that she is willing to stand tall against nonsense. :thumbsup: Rob
 
40.png
OrdinaryMelkite:
I guess that is the Evangelical side of her showing; she moves between the Catholicism and Evangelical worlds.
Yeah, that’s probably the first clip, where non Christians will consider Christine O’Donnell backwards…with some justification…The evolution stuff, shouldn’t be a threat, I wouldn’t call it a “myth” if I was taking a skeptical point of view.
I don’t think that evolution is a myth exactly. On the other hand, there do appear to be missing links in the evolutionary process.
I believe in the future, there’ll be some new theory , or an amendment to existing Evolutionary theory, that’ll make the JESUS FISH mockers with the Darwin Lizard thing be embarrassed. It’s like the Age of the Earth theories, things die out or reach a dead end, when you look at the scope of history…

The Natural Selection stuff, etc and stuff that deals with genetic drift is solid, however.
 
Not to take away from the discussions on evolution I would like to point out that Bill Mahr is a Progressive who is looking for a way to get into this election. I think should Christine O’Donnell loose he will no doubt let it be known that “he saved us” from Christine. I actually think his constant digging up dirt makes Ms ODonnell a more sympathetic candidate resulting in increased fund raising.

To be honest Bill Mahr is a bully picking on a poor defenseless girl. Or that is what alot of people see.
 
To be honest Bill Mahr is a bully picking on a poor defenseless girl. Or that is what alot of people see.
No one running for the US senate on a major party platform is poor or defenseless. Or a girl.

Its a tough league and if O’Donnell wants to operate there she needs to have a tougher hide.
 
Not to take away from the discussions on evolution I would like to point out that Bill Mahr is a Progressive who is looking for a way to get into this election. I think should Christine O’Donnell loose he will no doubt let it be known that “he saved us” from Christine. I actually think his constant digging up dirt makes Ms ODonnell a more sympathetic candidate resulting in increased fund raising.

To be honest Bill Mahr is a bully picking on a poor defenseless girl. Or that is what alot of people see.
I’ve been saying that Maher is not acting from a place of “Oh, the “witchcraft” footage just HAPPENED to be found; here it is.” He deliberately dug this up to make her look like some sort of Hypocritical, Religious Fanatic.

Folks here will say that I “do not know this for certain.” I DO know that I’ve been watching the guy long enought to know he is not some “disinterested non-partisan observer of Human Affairs.” He is a Committed Progressive (with some Libertarian leanings) who is openly (like many in the media and enterntainment worlds) trying to push his Political and Moral agenda on the American public.
 
Folks here will say that I “do not know this for certain.” I DO know that I’ve been watching the guy long enought to know he is not some “disinterested non-partisan observer of Human Affairs.” He is a Committed Progressive (with some Libertarian leanings) who is openly (like many in the media and enterntainment worlds) trying to push his Political and Moral agenda on the American public.
So, he’s a differently-oriented Hannity, Limbaugh or Beck?

The nerve!:rolleyes:
 
Please continue the attacks on Christine O’Donnell.

In fact, make them even nastier, if possible. Visit wiki for some juicy tidbits.

Because every time an attack appears, more and more supporters emerge.

Because the average person considers the attacks as being on THEM!

Everyone has some kind of baggage, and she has dealt with hers arguably better than most of us.

Consider that no one else emerged to challenge Mike Castle except her. And she defeated him.

For the campaign to the November 2nd election, Christine O’Donnell set up a fund raising goal or somewhere around $250,000.

Her goals were modest because she achieved a lot of success in the past with very little money. Her first campaign was a write-in campaign, which was extraordinary. Her second campaign had a very low budget. Miniscule. And her successful primary campaign is said to have cost under $200,000 and she spent 1/10th of what Castle spent. [The actual numbers are on CAF somewhere.] If you listen to www.wgmd.com they have reported that many people wanted to vote for her in the primary but didn’t switch from Independent in time.

So far the actual total of donations to her general election campaign is over $2,500,000.

And all of that in about two weeks.

Visit www.christine2010.com to see the neat totalizing system they have.
 
So, he’s a differently-oriented Hannity, Limbaugh or Beck?

The nerve!:rolleyes:
You’re ASSUMING that because I lean RIGHT that I immediately excuse or ignore the actions of the afore-mentioned people. Nothing could be further from the Truth. BOTH sides try to unfairly push their perspective viewpoints on the American people. The difference is that Maher’s “side” makes up MOST of the Media and Entertainment industries. The three mentioned above’s “side” is mostly confined to Talk Radio and Fox News. THAT’S the difference.

Personally I don’t care for Hannity’s smug, pompous persona (though I DO agree with a lot of his positions)-----He is just too much “The GOP can do no wrong”-----and Limbaugh IS occassionally still funny but his Time is WAY past. He ceased to be the “force” and “influence” he used to be when he ceased to be seen as the"Voice Of The Average Person Who Was Fed Up With The Status Quo"and instead became known as just another mouthpiece for the Republican Party. He also has become more vicious and caustic as the years roll on and that has turned off a lot of people off. Including me.

I don’t agree with everything Beck stands for but I DO watch him occassionally. He can be genuinely funny at times (in a sarcastic, over-the-top way) and he genuinely cares about the direction this country is taking. He also does make some good points. Doesn’t mean I am a “fan” of everything he stands for. And he IS willing to criticize both sides of the aisle when need be. Basically a man of strong Conservative Values who goes too far at times.

And yes, sometimes these gentlemen like them go too far and try to make the Public swallow what they’re selling without reservation. And that IS wrong too. Again, BOTH sides are wrong inn doing this and they need to be called out on it.

Beau, PLEASE do not resort to knee-jerk responses like “Well, your side does the same thing, so your point is moot.” Because you’re ASSUMING, and you know the saying—“You make an A-- out of U and Me.” 👍
 
No one running for the US senate on a major party platform is poor or defenseless. Or a girl.

Its a tough league and if O’Donnell wants to operate there she needs to have a tougher hide.
First, seeing that you are from the south side of Chicago you have drunk deeply from the Mayor Daley Kool Aid Trough. :rolleyes:

Second, I wasn’t implying that running for the Senate of the United States did not require someone to be able to withstand a media protology exam. I was merely pointing out that the continual attacks by Mahr may backfire and ellicit sympathy.
 
I think this a unprecedented for a senate candidate.

"WASHINGTON — Tea party favorite Christine O’Donnell, whose Republican primary upset in Delaware’s Senate race shocked the GOP, canceled appearances Sunday on two national news shows. Meanwhile, comedian Bill Maher dug up a clip of O’Donnell appearing on his “Politically Incorrect” show in 1999 in which she says she “dabbled in witchcraft.”

The context of what led to her comments is not clear, and O’Donnell is laughing while she talks. “I dabbled into witchcraft. I never joined a coven,” she said. " … I hung around people who were doing these things. I’m not making this stuff up. I know what they told me they do," she said.

“… One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn’t know it. I mean, there’s little blood there and stuff like that,” she said. “We went to a movie and then had a little midnight picnic on a satanic altar.” Since O’Donnell’s upset of nine-term Rep. Mike Castle, opponents have unearthed unflattering age-old television clips. Her campaign didn’t immediately return a telephone message Saturday, but she has in the past dismissed her previous comments."

google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i9rv3pJ0e0ju_X-K2vMUfo7Mah-wD9IAMCMO1
Thanks to the Tea Party, the Democrats have secured a US Senate seat in Delaware this November.

Way to go, Tea Party! How many more seats are you going hand to the Democrats?

Message to Tea Party - THOROUGHLY VETTING BEFORE ENDORSING IS ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA!!!
 
Thanks to the Tea Party, the Democrats have secured a US Senate seat in Delaware this November.

Way to go, Tea Party! How many more seats are you going hand to the Democrats?

Message to Tea Party - THOROUGHLY VETTING BEFORE ENDORSING IS ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA!!!
I was not aware the election was over in Delaware?
 
Thanks to the Tea Party, the Democrats have secured a US Senate seat in Delaware this November.

Way to go, Tea Party! How many more seats are you going hand to the Democrats?

Message to Tea Party - THOROUGHLY VETTING BEFORE ENDORSING IS ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA!!!
So the other Deleware candidate, his last name is Coons (I think) was once a self avowed Marxist. And he is less wacky because…:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top