C
chevalier
Guest
According to a Life Site News article, Young pro-lifers were standing on the pavement with posters and leaflets. Before, they made sure everything was legal.
Police arrived and started dragging them to squad cars, including twisting the arms of female protesters from behind.
They hand-cuffed an 18 year old female so tight she cried from pain, it is said.
They locked them in cells for 6 hours without water or access to telephone.
Shackles on ankles were employed.
Some of the jail guards were working as security guards at an abortion clinic.
Charges on paper did not include reference to a penal statute. It was only, “charge of trespassing.”
lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/feb/09021610.html
It looks like distraught consciences are flying a large hit-back at whomever upsets the delicate peace of mind of the populace supporting abortion. Nothing in the activity of the protesters was criminal and yet the reaction employed was characteristic of how people react to serious public crimes. Why this? Because of the very, very upsetting feeling that they caused. Because they caused remourse and made people question their views. The so called hate speech laws emerging world-wide are trying to make that kind of protest a real crime. Fine to preach “progress”, not fine to preach life. Those who dare suggest there’s something wrong with the liberal (morally) paradigm will be prosecuted.
In this case, however, it was a pure emotional backlash. I chose to bring this article to your attention because it shows the pro-choice reaction in its nude form. The stark contrast between the police’s public charge and its members’ purely a-legal (i.e. not so much illegal as acting as if no laws existed in the first place) actions.
Police arrived and started dragging them to squad cars, including twisting the arms of female protesters from behind.
They hand-cuffed an 18 year old female so tight she cried from pain, it is said.
They locked them in cells for 6 hours without water or access to telephone.
Shackles on ankles were employed.
Some of the jail guards were working as security guards at an abortion clinic.
Charges on paper did not include reference to a penal statute. It was only, “charge of trespassing.”
lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/feb/09021610.html
It looks like distraught consciences are flying a large hit-back at whomever upsets the delicate peace of mind of the populace supporting abortion. Nothing in the activity of the protesters was criminal and yet the reaction employed was characteristic of how people react to serious public crimes. Why this? Because of the very, very upsetting feeling that they caused. Because they caused remourse and made people question their views. The so called hate speech laws emerging world-wide are trying to make that kind of protest a real crime. Fine to preach “progress”, not fine to preach life. Those who dare suggest there’s something wrong with the liberal (morally) paradigm will be prosecuted.
In this case, however, it was a pure emotional backlash. I chose to bring this article to your attention because it shows the pro-choice reaction in its nude form. The stark contrast between the police’s public charge and its members’ purely a-legal (i.e. not so much illegal as acting as if no laws existed in the first place) actions.
