Bishop Fellay: SSPX ‘does not seek primarily a canonical recognition’ [CC]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholic_Press

Guest
The superior general of the Society of St. Pius X said in a June 29 statement that the Society “does not seek primarily a canonical recognition.”

“In the great and painful confusion that currently reigns in the Church, the proclamation of Catholic doctrine requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged by a large number of pastors, including the Pope himself,” said Bishop Bernard Fellay.

More…
 
ROME A traditionalist group of Catholic bishops and priests who have been separated from the wider church for decades appear to have abandoned efforts to reunite with Rome, releasing a forceful statement Wednesday that claims Pope Francis is encouraging the spreading of errors in church teaching.

The Society of St. Pius X, founded by the late French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1970 mainly in opposition to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, says now it “does not primarily seek a canonical recognition” from the Vatican for its continuing activities.

The society also claims there is a “great and painful confusion that currently reigns in the Church” that “requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged by a large number of pastors, including the Pope himself.”

The statement, released on the society’s website, seems to eliminate all chances that the group might reunite with Rome. Popes have tried to repair relations over four decades, apparently now to no avail.

ncronline.org/news/vatican/traditionalist-st-pius-x-society-abandons-unification-claims-francis-spreading-errors
 
Well that should put a fork in the idea that the SSPX actually wants to reunify with Rome. They seem to be setting themselves up to eventually be another breakaway Catholic group.
 
Whoa! Not so fast!
The response posted by Gilliam comes from the National Catholic Reporter.
Let’s wait to see what the Vatican has to say about the situation, and of course, continue our prayers that “they might be one” in accordance with the will of Our Lord.
May God bless all who visit our thread.
Amen.
 
Here’s the full text from Bp. Fellay, with smilies from yours truly:

(Source: dici.org/en/news/communique-from-the-superior-general/)

"The purpose of the Society of Saint Pius X is chiefly the formation of priests, the essential condition for the renewal of the Church and for the restoration of society.
  1. In the great and painful confusion that currently reigns in the Church, the proclamation of Catholic doctrine requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged by a large number of pastors, including the Pope himself. :mad: :slapfight:
  2. The Society of Saint Pius X, in the present state of grave necessity which gives it the right and duty to administer spiritual aid to the souls that turn to it, does not seek primarily a canonical recognition, to which it has a right as a Catholic work. It has only one desire: faithfully to bring the light of the bi-millennial Tradition which shows the only route to follow in this age of darkness in which the cult of man replaces the worship of God, in society as in the Church. :frighten:
  3. The “restoration of all things in Christ” intended by Saint Pius X, following Saint Paul (cf. Eph. 1:10), cannot happen without the support of a Pope who concretely favors the return to Sacred Tradition. While waiting for that blessed day, the Society of Saint Pius X intends to redouble its efforts to establish and to spread, with the means that Divine Providence gives to it, the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ. :sad_bye:
  4. The Society of Saint Pius X prays and does penance for the Pope, that he might have the strength to proclaim Catholic faith and morals in their entirety. In this way he will hasten the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary that we earnestly desire as we approach the centennial of the apparitions in Fatima. :crying::gopray2:"
You can listen to this while reading it. It enhances the whole experience.

Looks like all that reunion stuff will have to wait. So long, guys. :whacky::ehh:
 
In a September letter to the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelization, which is organizing the holy year on his behalf, he explained that members of the society would be granted faculties during the year to offer absolution of sins “validly and licitly” to those who approach them for confession.
In a March interview posted on the society’s website, Fellay had before said he thought Francis may consider his group as existing on the “periphery” and thus needing to be accompanied back to the Church.

Outside of the faculties granted during the Jubilee year, members of the traditionalist society are considered not to be in full communion with Rome and, in normal circumstances, its priests and bishops cannot exercise Roman Catholic ministry.

lastampa.it/2016/06/29/vaticaninsider/eng/the-vatican/traditionalist-st-pius-x-society-abandons-unification-claims-francis-spreading-errors-nSQv70JmSCuxufPP8SW0II/pagina.html
 
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i...015_Credit_Bohumil_Petrik_CNA_6_29_15.jpgSion, Switzerland, Jun 29, 2016 / 02:25 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After indications of progress toward reconciliation earlier this year, the head of the Society of St. Pius X stated Wednesday that canonical recognition is not what the priestly society primarily seeks.

“The Society of Saint Pius X, in the present state of grave necessity which gives it the right and duty to administer spiritual aid to the souls that turn to it, does not seek primarily a canonical recognition,” Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior general of the SSPX, wrote in a June 29 communique.

He added that the SSPX “has a right” to canonical recognition “as a Catholic work.”

The society “has only one desire,” he said: “faithfully to bring the light of the bi-millennial Tradition which shows the only route to follow in this age of darkness in which the cult of man replaces the worship of God, in society as in the Church.”

Bishop Fellay’s statement was issued after a June 25-28 meeting of major superiors of the SSPX.

He stated that “in the great and painful confusion that currently reigns in the Church, the proclamation of Catholic doctrine requires the denunciation of errors that have made their way into it and are unfortunately encouraged by a large number of pastors, including the Pope himself.”

Recalling the motto of St. Pius X, “to restore all things in Christ”, Bishop Fellay said that this “cannot happen without the support of a Pope who concretely favors the return to Sacred Tradition.”

“While waiting for that blessed day, the Society of Saint Pius X intends to redouble its efforts to establish and to spread, with the means that Divine Providence gives to it, the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”

He added that the SSPX “prays and does penance for the Pope, that he might have the strength to proclaim Catholic faith and morals in their entirety.”

By doing this, Bishop Fellay stated, the Pope will “hasten the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary that we earnestly desire as we approach the centennial of the apparitions in Fatima.”

The bishop’s statement also recalled that the purpose of the SSPX “is chiefly the formation of priests.”

The SSPX was founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1970 to form priests, as a response to what he described as errors that had crept into the Church after the Second Vatican Council. Its relations with the Holy See became particularly strained in 1988 when Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer consecrated four bishops without the permission of Pope John Paul II.

The illicit consecrations resulted in the excommunication of the bishops involved. The excommunications of the surviving bishops were lifted in 2009 by Benedict XVI and since then negotiations “to rediscover full communion with the Church” have continued between the Society and the Vatican.

In remitting the excommunications, Benedict noted that “doctrinal questions obviously remain and until they are clarified the Society has no canonical status in the Church and its ministers cannot legitimately exercise any ministry.”

The biggest obstacles for the Society’s reconciliation have been the statements on religious liberty in Vatican II’s declaration Dignitatis humanae as well as the declaration Nostra aetate, which it claims contradict previous Catholic teaching.

There were indications in recent years of movement towards regularization of the priestly society, which has some 590 priest-members, including a memo apparently meant for circulation among its leadership.

The Feb. 19 memo from Fr. Franz Schmidberger had said it “seems the time to normalize the situation of the Society has come.” The priest is a past superior general of the society who is now rector of its seminary in Germany.

He said the Vatican had been “gradually lowering its demands and recent proposals” regarding the society’s position toward the Second Vatican Council and the Novus Ordo Mass which was implemented after it.

Although the group would be likely to “return from its ‘exile’,” he said, it would expect further discussion and would not be silent in the face of what it considers to be errors.

The priest’s memo noted the society’s need for licit consecration of any future bishops.

Archbishop Guido Pozzo, secretary for the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, spoke about interactions with the society in an April 6 interview with La Croix. The archbishop, whose commission is responsible for discussions with the society, said that discussions over the last few years have led to “an important clarification” that the Second Vatican Council “can be adequately understood only in the context of the full Tradition of the Church and her constant Magisterium.”

He said certain questions can remain “subject to discussion and clarification.”

In April 10 remarks to pilgrims in France, Bishop Fellay said that he saw “profound change” in the society’s relationship with the Vatican. He suggested Church leaders would not force them to accept the Second Vatican Council, having met with Pope Francis and Archbishop Pozzo April 1-2.

In 2015 the Holy See delegated a cardinal and three bishops to visit the seminaries of the SSPX. They were sent to become better acquainted with the society, and to discuss doctrinal and theological topics in a less formal context.

And Pope Francis announced in a September 2015 letter on the Jubilee Year of Mercy that during the jubilee year the faithful can validly and licitly receive absolution of their sins from priests of the SSPX.

Full article…
 
Don’t we have a thread on this already? 🙂

Also, this article is misrepresenting the position of Pope Francis, who actually extended an olive branch to the SSPX for the Year of Mercy. 😦
 
Don’t we have a thread on this already? 🙂

Also, this article is misrepresenting the position of Pope Francis, who actually extended an olive branch to the SSPX for the Year of Mercy. 😦
Also, the word “schismatic” is not correct.
 
Well, it’s ABCnews, so…👍

I don’t find most news to be fair in coverage of anything Catholic.
 
Maybe he just wants an apology, like everybody else.
That’s funny. To the point of the statement/thread…from the beginning of their institutional irregularity (which was when…the 70s, I think), it has been clear that the SSPX has never seen canonical recognition as a “primary” concern.

Dan
 
Did the Remnant Newspaper finally declare itself to be in schism? 😃
 
What Bishop Fellay says doesn’t really matter, does it?
You mean beyond that he’s the head of the SSPX, and if he doesn’t want to unify with Rome, the SSPX will not be unifying with Rome?
 
You mean beyond that he’s the head of the SSPX, and if he doesn’t want to unify with Rome, the SSPX will not be unifying with Rome?
That may matter to a lot of people, SSPX friends and foes alike, but he doesn’t make Church decisions. None of us do.

When we hear SSPX confessions valid or invalid past November, then we’ll know some kind of credible and significant determination was reached.
 
Also, the word “schismatic” is not correct.
The SSPX were guilty of acting against the Church and the very person of the Holy Father in a schismatic act.

As Pope Saint John Paul II wrote in the Apostolic Letter, Ecclesia Dei:
“…this act was one of disobedience to the Roman Pontiff in a very grave matter and of supreme importance for the unity of the church, such as is the ordination of bishops whereby the apostolic succession is sacramentally perpetuated. Hence such disobedience - which implies in practice the rejection of the Roman primacy - constitutes a schismatic act.”
This must never be lost sight of until they repent of their disobedience and for having rejected the Roman primacy.
 
I think he is pointing out that his primary concern and the purpose of the society is not one specific goal here.

Actually this sounds a lot like many things that have been said. I think a recognition is coming and both sides ( the cdf and the sspx) are spinning what will most likely be a unilateral move by the pope.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top