F
Fairwinds
Guest
and with that BS insult, I’m done.you must be a neglectful parent indeed
and with that BS insult, I’m done.you must be a neglectful parent indeed
I am very sorry for the offence caused, it was a thoughtless and foolish commentand with that BS insult, I’m done.
Absolute hyperbole!And how many have their weapons already locked and loaded in fear and are potentially ready to shoot most anyone - however innocent - who dares commit the heinous crime of coming anywhere near them?
Running the race is the ultimate ‘game,’ as Paul said.politics is the ultimate game, and the gun grabbers lost. the president was the victim of bad timing. a sour economy, North Korea, the Boston bombers all sideswiped the momentum he had from exploiting the CT shootings. and with the coming election cycle, he’s never get enough congressional or senate votes to grab.
F
If that verse supported ‘weapon’ rights, why did the early Church suffer such martyrdom for over 300 years? Seriously, that misapplied verse has been responded to multiple times, with Catholic commentaries, and the early Church fathers. I guess some missed it.Gun laws?*** Instead ***of Bishops?![]()
Breaking story: “New gun law has abortion clinics closing in droves!” < Don’t see it. :nope:
I’m a non-gun-owner Catholic but I propose a (silly) compromise to keep the peace:
The Church should manufacture guns under the brand name “Sword*.”
Come to think of it, maybe the Church can buy stock in a cloak making enterprise to help the flock clear the preliminaries.
http://i.tfcdn.com/img2/i4OfA0oAY5r...nl5yfq4-RETfU9_EMNXA083RKEnXRy-rIB0A/fyVMtP8A
- Per the Bishop’s counsel the new “Sword” will be a “tighter gun”! :doh2:
“Sword and Cloak Set” (plastic bullets or marshmallows not included)
- **“Please send us more clerics who teach of you … and shepherd our Dioceses.
To pick up the slack for the ones out Social Crusading with the politicians” **
You may want to read the rules of the forum. It’s not allowed to ‘suppose’ what another believes, and it’s also against the rules to change the topic to posters personally.you’ll have to explain how God works to Prodigal, who is somewhat misinformed.
regarding the Warsaw Uprising, apparently our CCC does not approve.
F
How long were the Israelites under the Egyptians? God works according to His plan, and not to the expectations of men.you mean the 40 million people who died in WW2 didn’t have faith?
F
Perhaps you’ll share with us how background checks would prevent you from defending your family?I honor the memory of the Jews who died in the Warsaw Uprising, CCC notwithstanding. I don’t think I could explain why in terms that would make sense to you.
I’d stop my daughter’s would-be rapist with a gunshot. if you’d choose different, its not for me to criticize or question your motives.
F
This from the fellow who was so vociferous and in effect being against the defunding of planned parenthood?Luk 22:35-38
<snipped, only because of the overflow of letters which by the way the forum rules state not to write overly long statements)
But when it was necessary for them to show their own strength, He withdrew from them for a little His grace, bidding them do something of themselves; as it follows, But now he that has a purse, that is, wherein to carry money, let him take it, and likewise his scrip, that is, to carry provisions in. And truly when they had neither shoes, nor girdle, nor staff, nor money, they never suffered the want of any thing. But when He allowed them purse and scrip, they seem to suffer hunger, and thirst, and nakedness. As if He said to them, Hitherto all things have been most richly supplied to you, but now I would have you also experience poverty, therefore I hold you no longer to the former rule, but I command you to get purse and scrip. Now God might even to the end have kept them in plenty, but for many reasons He was unwilling to do so. First that they might impute nothing to themselves, but acknowledge that every thing flowed from God; secondly, that they might learn moderation; thirdly, that they might not think too highly of themselves. For this cause while He permitted them to fall into many unlooked for evils, He relaxed the rigor of the former law, lest it should become grievous and intolerable.
BEDE; For He does not train His disciples in the same rule of life, in time of persecution, as in the time of peace. When He sent them to preach, He ordered them to take nothing in the way, ordaining in truth, that He who preaches the Gospel should live by the Gospel. But when the crisis of death was at hand, and the whole nation persecuted both the shepherd and the Hock, He proposes a law adapted to the time, allowing them to take the necessaries of life, until the rage of the persecutors was abated, and the time of preaching the Gospel had returned. Herein He leaves us also an example, that at times when a just reason urges, we may intermit without blame somewhat of the strictness of our determination.
AUG. By no inconsistency then of Him who commands, but by the reason of the dispensation, according to the diversity of times are commandments, counsels, or permissions changed.
AMBROSE; But He who forbids to strike, why does He order them to buy a sword? unless perchance that there may be a defense prepared, but no necessary retaliation; a seeming ability to be revenged, without the will. Hence it follows, And he who has not, (that is, a purse,) let him sell his garment, and buy a sword,
CHRYS. What is this? He who said, If any one strike you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also, now arms His disciples, and with a sword only. For if it were fitting to be completely armed, not only must a man possess a sword, but shield and helmet. But even though a thousand had arms of this kind, how could the eleven be prepared for all the attacks and lying in wait of people, tyrants, allies, and nations, and how should they not quake at the mere sight of armed men, who had been brought up near lakes and rivers? We must not then suppose that He ordered them to possess swords, but by the swords He points at the secret attack of the Jews. And hence it follows, For I say to you, that this that is written must, be accomplished in me: And he was numbered with the transgressors.
THEOPHYL. While they were contending among themselves above concerning priority, He said, It is not a time of dignities, but rather of danger and slaughter. Behold I even your Master am led to a disgraceful death, to be reckoned with the transgressors. For these things which are prophesied of Me have an end, that is, a fulfillment. Wishing then to hint at a violent attack, He made mention of a sword, not altogether revealing it, lest they should be seized with dismay, nor did He entirely provide that they should not be shaken by these sudden attacks, but that afterwards recovering, they might marvel how He gave Himself up to the Passion, a ransom for the salvation of men.
BASIL; Or the Lord does not bid them carry purse and scrip and buy a sword, but predicts that it should come to pass, that in truth the Apostles, forgetful of the time of the Passion, of the gifts and law of their Lord, would dare to take up the sword. For often does the Scripture make use of the imperative form of speech in the place of prophecy. Still in many books we do not find, Let him take, or buy, but, he will take, he will buy.
You need to simmer down. A quick reading of your posts this morning reveals extreme anger. At what, I have no clue. Maybe you should just turn off the computer and get some fresh air.This from the fellow who was so vociferous and in effect being against the defunding of planned parenthood?No, not offtopic, we are talking about lives but only the lives that fit your agenda.
What are you talking about? I am pro life, from conception until natural death, for all people, as the Church teaches. It gets old to be falsely accused because I don’t agree with all on all political issues.This from the fellow who was so vociferous and in effect being against the defunding of planned parenthood?No, not offtopic, we are talking about lives but only the lives that fit your agenda.
Cars are designed for transportation and bathtubs for cleansing. None of the have the primary function of killing. Change the function, then it becomes a moral issue, a car rigged to explode, a ladder designed to collapse under weight or an electrified bathtub.Cars take lives. Bathtubs take lives. Ladders take lives
But effectively pro-life, or just theoretically? Anyone who give the Democrat party support is participating in that party’s agenda of abortion rights. Being pro-life includes a political component - working to change our laws so that they protect the unborn. It would seem that helping to keep those in power who are working to maintain anti-life laws would be an ineffective pro-life strategy.What are you talking about? I am pro life, from conception until natural death, for all people, as the Church teaches. It gets old to be falsely accused because I don’t agree with all on all political issues.
I understand pro life, and it’s not ‘theoretic.’ I also believe it extends to many other issues, where the Church calls for a ‘dignity of life.’ The issue becomes politicized often, when other issues are discussed and the bishops are questioned for not staying with the ‘single’ issue. Christ called us to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, give shelter to the stranger, care for the sick, and visit the imprisoned, among other things; primarily to love one another, including our enemies, as He loves us. There was no single issue, forsaking all others. To forsake a dignity of life in one area, forsakes life in another. We are called to be a people of life on ALL issues, and not just one that seems to be sometimes used to advance positions on other issues.But effectively pro-life, or just theoretically? Anyone who give the Democrat party support is participating in that party’s agenda of abortion rights. Being pro-life includes a political component - working to change our laws so that they protect the unborn. It would seem that helping to keep those in power who are working to maintain anti-life laws would be an ineffective pro-life strategy.
Ishii
And you lost…to bombs. Check out Boston.
Abortions always comes up. If this thread was talking about supporting the democratic party or voting for a person based on the lone issue of gun control, then abortion would be a valid argument, at least until (if ever) democrats back off abortion as a tenet of their faith. Otherwise, abortion is not the topic.There was no single issue, forsaking all others. To forsake a dignity of life in one area, forsakes life in another. We are called to be a people of life on ALL issues, and not just one that seems to be sometimes used to advance positions on other issues.
Each bishop is responsible for his own diocese and no bishop can make any statement at all that is binding on another bishop. The head of a committee can obviously speak but his comments carry no weight outside of his own area of responsibility.The head of a committee most certainly can speak, and normally does, representing committee findings.
It wouldn’t matter if the pope offered his opinion. The prudential judgments of one bishop have no significance whatever outside his own diocese.We’ve had Cardinal Dolan speak, and there was a response to the Newtown massacre, naming several bishops.
One bishop does not have to offer correction for what another has said. If he does not positively confirm it for his diocese the comment is meaningless … and I am unaware of many bishops lining up to support Bishop Blair’s opinion.Still, not one bishop speaks concerns of correction, or in favor of gun rights as they are conveyed on these forums.
You are quite free to find direction wherever you choose as are we all but there is no reason to believe that the direction Bishop Blair has provided on this issue is any more moral than the opinions offered on this forum. There would appear to be, however, reason to believe his opinion is less well informed than some of those that have been expressed here.We can politicize their words, for our own interests, or we can accept the words as guidance on a culture of life in a secular world, in my opinion.